Universe Engineering

Universe Engineering

Author
Discussion

PD9

Original Poster:

2,000 posts

187 months

Friday 2nd March 2012
quotequote all
Looking at the basic structure and makeup of subatomic particles and matter, elements and the molecular dynamics of the atom; I think the universe is fantastically well engineered just to be created from a point of singularity.

Fair enough the Big Bang is a well supported theory and the most comprehensive explanation for the development of the universe. Everything in this 'soup' has bonded together far too nicely in the first 13.75 billion years for my liking and it's got me thinking; Is there is more behind it? Something fishy goin' on out there...

Laplace

1,090 posts

184 months

Friday 2nd March 2012
quotequote all
So, what would make it not as "fishy" in your opinion?

tank slapper

7,949 posts

285 months

Friday 2nd March 2012
quotequote all
Of course it bonds together nicely - if it didn't then the universe wouldn't exist as we know it. You could make that same point no matter how simple or complex the universe was, because as observed it would all fit together.

andy_s

19,424 posts

261 months

Saturday 3rd March 2012
quotequote all
Its only this universe, in this time, and we only know it's fantastically engineered because we're here, otherwise it would just 'be'.

The balance between mass and energy could have been (has been/will be) slightly different and nothing as we know it would be here...

BarnatosGhost

31,608 posts

255 months

Saturday 3rd March 2012
quotequote all
PD9 said:
Looking at the basic structure and makeup of subatomic particles and matter, elements and the molecular dynamics of the atom; I think the universe is fantastically well engineered just to be created from a point of singularity.

Fair enough the Big Bang is a well supported theory and the most comprehensive explanation for the development of the universe. Everything in this 'soup' has bonded together far too nicely in the first 13.75 billion years for my liking and it's got me thinking; Is there is more behind it? Something fishy goin' on out there...
Awooga! Awooga! Science forum 'meaning-of-life' attribution aberration! Awooga! Awooga!

jmorgan

36,010 posts

286 months

Saturday 3rd March 2012
quotequote all
Who created god then?

Simpo Two

85,883 posts

267 months

Saturday 3rd March 2012
quotequote all
jmorgan said:
Who created god then?
God-parents.

jmorgan

36,010 posts

286 months

Saturday 3rd March 2012
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
jmorgan said:
Who created god then?
God-parents.
Who created god parents?

Engineer1

10,486 posts

211 months

Saturday 3rd March 2012
quotequote all
We are sat in a universe that is perfect for us to exist in because if it wasn't we wouldn't be sat here wondering how the universe came to be perfect for our existence.

Added to this the better the fit together of all the pieces the lower the requirement for a "Celestial Mechanic" to sit there and poke things right.

Hilts

4,409 posts

284 months

Saturday 3rd March 2012
quotequote all
jmorgan said:
Simpo Two said:
jmorgan said:
Who created god then?
God-parents.
Who created god parents?
Read 'Irreligion' by Paulos, he has a good line on invoking a higher creator.

From memory I think he says something like "This creationist Ponzi scheme quickly leads to metaphysical bankruptcy."

Hooli

32,278 posts

202 months

Saturday 3rd March 2012
quotequote all
jmorgan said:
Simpo Two said:
jmorgan said:
Who created god then?
God-parents.
Who created god parents?
The church smile

mattnunn

14,041 posts

163 months

Saturday 3rd March 2012
quotequote all
We're in a simualtion, see thread in lounge and google simulation argument.

PD9

Original Poster:

2,000 posts

187 months

Sunday 4th March 2012
quotequote all
mattnunn said:
We're in a simualtion, see thread in lounge and google simulation argument.
When do we get to level two?