Most important discovery - DNA or X-Rays?

Most important discovery - DNA or X-Rays?

Poll: Most important discovery - DNA or X-Rays?

Total Members Polled: 24

DNA: 46%
X-Rays: 54%
Author
Discussion

Simpo Two

Original Poster:

88,602 posts

278 months

Saturday 18th January
quotequote all
For some reason this question floated into my head earlier... what do you think and why?

eharding

14,413 posts

297 months

Sunday 19th January
quotequote all

I thought the original DNA discovery was done using X-ray diffraction? Hence, even if our understanding of DNA is of greater benefit to mankind, without our knowledge of X-rays, we wouldn't have had that understanding. Hence X-rays get the...er...X.

By coincidence I was clearing out the eaves today and found my old undergraduate Applied Physics practical notes, with some film strips from the X-ray crystallography sessions, taken some 40 years ago....


Simpo Two

Original Poster:

88,602 posts

278 months

Sunday 19th January
quotequote all
The double helix part was worked out by the X-rays, incidentally making an X-shape which somehow they knew indicated a helix. So yes, one discovery led to another

But thinking of mankind as a whole, which has been more advantageous?

abzmike

10,108 posts

119 months

Sunday 19th January
quotequote all
In terms of mending people that have broken things, or have issues to be looked at X-rays have been more important up until now - from now on DNA will be important for preventing and curing disease. But if you think you’ve broken your leg, DNA isn’t going to help.

Simpo Two

Original Poster:

88,602 posts

278 months

Sunday 19th January
quotequote all
abzmike said:
In terms of mending people that have broken things, or have issues to be looked at X-rays have been more important up until now - from now on DNA will be important for preventing and curing disease. But if you think you’ve broken your leg, DNA isn’t going to help.
Perhaps we could say 'both' then: X-rays for tactics and DNA for strategy.

maffski

1,894 posts

172 months

Thursday 23rd January
quotequote all
abzmike said:
...But if you think you’ve broken your leg, DNA isn’t going to help....
I disagree with your point of view, without DNA it doesn't have a leg to stand on.

CraigyMc

17,825 posts

249 months

Tuesday 28th January
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
For some reason this question floated into my head earlier... what do you think and why?
I think "this is probably why simpo has 87000 posts".

Austin Prefect

646 posts

5 months

Thursday 6th February
quotequote all
abzmike said:
In terms of mending people that have broken things, or have issues to be looked at X-rays have been more important up until now - from now on DNA will be important for preventing and curing disease. But if you think you’ve broken your leg, DNA isn’t going to help.
By that reckoning plaster and crutches are more important than X rays.

Yahonza

2,529 posts

43 months

Tuesday 11th February
quotequote all
X-Rays - because of their fundamental application in medical imaging, the science of materials, crystallography, astronomy, and various other things.
DNA may become the more important discovery in the long term but the 'discovery' of this genetic material was a long and complex one. We still don't understand fully how DNA orchestrates what goes on in an organism - there are also many other players in the world of molecular biology.

Several of the people that discovered X-rays also suffered for their art, in that many died from over-exposure to this ionising radiation which damaged their DNA in the process.