Channel 4 autopsy
Author
Discussion

angusfaldo

Original Poster:

2,830 posts

301 months

Thursday 21st November 2002
quotequote all
Anyone watch it?

I'm not interested myself, but I don't understand why there's so much fuss about it. Seems to me that we've gone so far to sanitise our society so that we don't see giblets and death and stuff that we forget it is all around us, all the time. I mean right now I'm sitting millimtres away from my own guts!

AJLintern

4,367 posts

290 months

Thursday 21st November 2002
quotequote all
Yes I saw it - was very interesting actually, I don't know what the problem is. They could have used a fresher body though, that guy looked decidedly manky - apparenly he had been pickled for 8 months! But I suppose they didn't want to go too far with blood spurting out everywhere...

Big_M

5,602 posts

290 months

Thursday 21st November 2002
quotequote all
Did anyone video it - my Mum phoned me last night and asked me to video it for her and I forgot.

M-Five

12,267 posts

311 months

Thursday 21st November 2002
quotequote all
I thought it was a load of poo! Way too short, it normally takes over an hour to do a full autopsy.

The camera work was awful, the organ dissections were cut so short as to show next to nothing.

The examiner didn’t seem to know how to do a lecture and was talking as if he was making mental notes to himself.

The body had been plasticised to stop the rot and smells so that it would be more acceptable to the audience – sod them I say, if they want to see an autopsy let them see it in all its gory glory.

I have seen three autopsies in the past and this was the most absurd, non-educational I have ever seen. They tried to make entertainment out of it and it just didn’t work.

rpguk

4,514 posts

311 months

Thursday 21st November 2002
quotequote all
definantly agree with the point about the camera work, it seemed to me that the camera men were too scared to get too close.

From an ethical point of view I had no qualms with it, I mean theres plenty of programmes on TV with footage of people dieing (which I find far more horrific) and watch Discovery channel late at night and you will see proper surgery, which is far more blood and guts.

However what did worry me slightly was that the man was said to have for the past 20 years since loosing his job drank 2 bottles of wisky a day. Now that suggests to me he was a pretty bad alcoholic, a whino prehaps, could he have been pursuaded to give his body for a couple of bottles of drink? On that assumption I found it a bit unethical.

CarZee

13,382 posts

294 months

Thursday 21st November 2002
quotequote all

rpguk said: definantly agree with the point about the camera work, it seemed to me that the camera men were too scared to get too close.
Then I recommend to them the significant benefit of booms and zoom lenses

cotty

42,145 posts

311 months

Thursday 21st November 2002
quotequote all

rpguk said:
watch Discovery channel late at night and you will see proper surgery, which is far more blood and guts.



My mum used to be into all that but why did she have to serve dinner just before watching a program about trippl eheart bypass

Big_M

5,602 posts

290 months

Thursday 21st November 2002
quotequote all

cotty said:
My mum used to be into all that but why did she have to serve dinner just before watching a program about trippl eheart bypass

What was it - stuffed lambs hearts

mr_tony

6,349 posts

296 months

Thursday 21st November 2002
quotequote all

Discovery channel late at night and you will see proper surgery, which is far more blood and guts


Ahh 'The Operation', usually it's not so bad, but eye operations always make my stomach turn.........euuuuuuuwwwwwww....

Don't think there should have been so much ho-har about this anyway. I think the establishment were more unhappy about the bodyworlds exhibition than the autopsy which is frankly just a publicity stunt to further publicise the show.

Not seen the show - anyone been?

funkyboogalooo

1,844 posts

295 months

Thursday 21st November 2002
quotequote all

AJLintern said: They could have used a fresher body though, that guy looked decidedly manky - apparenly he had been pickled for 8 months!


I was led to believe it was gonna be a women! must have been mankey if it was mistaken for a bloke

AJLintern

4,367 posts

290 months

Thursday 21st November 2002
quotequote all
no - he was most definately a bloke

rpguk

4,514 posts

311 months

Thursday 21st November 2002
quotequote all
Well you could be forgiven for being mistaken, he wasn't exactly well endowed (poor man)

joust

14,622 posts

286 months

Thursday 21st November 2002
quotequote all

mr_tony said:Not seen the show - anyone been?
Yep - it's just up from one of our work offices - it really is facinating, and not at all gory (although very spooky looking someone in the eye that's all "pulled apart".

Well recommended - and it's closing soon so get down there..

J

madcop

6,649 posts

290 months

Thursday 21st November 2002
quotequote all
I have been to several dozen of these, (fresh ones)
Once the first is over and the smell has been got used to (mortuary theatres have a strange scented smell to them), they are very interesting, particularly if the pathologist is of a mind to explain what is happening and how they arrive at the prognosis of the cause of death with demonstrations.

dead bodies are not like living ones. They look like shop manikins, they smell different and they are a very wrong colour for people.

Normally the body is prepared by the mortuary assistant who does most of the cutting and sawing before the Pathologist does his investigation unless it is a suspicious death where everyone including a home office Pathologist, who needs to be present, is, and from the very start.

basil brush

5,586 posts

290 months

Thursday 21st November 2002
quotequote all
I only watched the first part. The fact that the body had been embalmed or something made it not seem real. The most bizarre thing for me was the audience aplause when he took out the internal organs.

Maybe they should have wired a red bulb into the guy's nose and made it like a big game of operation. The audience could have shouted out which part they wanted removing. I'm sure Sky are looking into it.