£47.5bn needed to pay for the war.
£47.5bn needed to pay for the war.
Author
Discussion

mrs fish

Original Poster:

30,018 posts

289 months

Tuesday 25th March 2003
quotequote all
The Bush administration is expected to ask Congress for $74.7bn (£47.5bn) to pay for the war.

President George W Bush met Congressional leaders on Monday afternoon to tell them how much the war in Iraq will cost.

He will formally propose a supplementary budget to Congress in a speech at the Pentagon on Tuesday.

The president is expected to propose additional cash for homeland security and humanitarian needs as well as funding for the direct costs of the war, which are estimated at $62.5bn.

The request is based on the war lasting 30 days, and includes $500m in humanitarian aid, $1.7bn to rebuild Iraq, and $500m for the FBI to fight terrorism at home, as part of a $4.2bn appropriation for home security.

It will also provide up to $8bn in aid to US allies affected by war.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/2882681.stm


And thats only for a month long war. I can see it lasting longer than that.

plotloss

67,280 posts

301 months

Tuesday 25th March 2003
quotequote all
We've already put £1.7 billion in with another £1.7 billion in the War Chest.

I reckon you could build quite a few hospitals with that money...

Matt.

Martin Hunt

301 posts

299 months

Tuesday 25th March 2003
quotequote all
I don't belive this money around war thing.

We pay our soldiers, we put them up in digs in the uk, they use live ammo in training, they have been deployed around the world as peace keepers.

So why £1.7 Billion?

Yes I understand logistics to get them out there etc, but all other costs are picked up by the usual budget.

I would assume anything over £50 million is being syphoned somewhere.......

polar_ben

1,413 posts

290 months

Tuesday 25th March 2003
quotequote all

Martin Hunt said:So why £1.7 Billion?
Tomahawk missile - $500,000 each
Apache helicopter - $16 million each
Tornado fighter - $27 million each
MOAB bomb - $27,000 each

etc.

Won't be doing the US national debt much good

plotloss

67,280 posts

301 months

Tuesday 25th March 2003
quotequote all
Is the MOAB really only $27K?

Now thats what I call bang for buck!

Matt.

incorrigible

13,668 posts

292 months

Tuesday 25th March 2003
quotequote all
You saving up for fireworks night Matt ?

Bonce

4,339 posts

310 months

Tuesday 25th March 2003
quotequote all
Do you think they'd do part exchange on a used Lotus? £27k sounds really good value!

CarZee

13,382 posts

298 months

Tuesday 25th March 2003
quotequote all

plotloss said: I reckon you could build quite a few hospitals with that money...
That's a bit Grauniadist for you, me old mate.. oh and you appear to have spilled lentils on your tie..

plotloss

67,280 posts

301 months

Tuesday 25th March 2003
quotequote all

CarZee said:

plotloss said: I reckon you could build quite a few hospitals with that money...
That's a bit Grauniadist for you, me old mate.. oh and you appear to have spilled lentils on your tie..


Yes granted that was a bit cack handed of me.

However, my stance on this war, without wishing to respark the debate is that they havent hurt us, and as we are not making them part of the Empire I dont think we have any business there. I know some of the Iraqi's are being opressed but then we do have our own problems that that money would go towards.

Therefore not so much pinko as nationalist.

Matt.

minimax

11,985 posts

287 months

Tuesday 25th March 2003
quotequote all

polar_ben said:

Martin Hunt said:So why £1.7 Billion?
Tomahawk missile - $500,000 each
Apache helicopter - $16 million each
Tornado fighter - $27 million each
MOAB bomb - $27,000 each

etc.

Won't be doing the US national debt much good



I thought the tomahawk cruise missiles were £1 million each? either way it's a lot of cash to be throwing overboard.

Stig

11,823 posts

315 months

Tuesday 25th March 2003
quotequote all
Don't worry, the UK's war effort is being funded by the congestion charge and road tax.

Well it must be, 'cos there's fcuk all evidence of it being spent anywhere else!

plotloss

67,280 posts

301 months

Tuesday 25th March 2003
quotequote all
Its quite startling to think that the £38bn that gets extracted from the combined pockets of 20 million motorists in 12 months wouldnt run the war for 30 days...

apache

39,731 posts

315 months

Tuesday 25th March 2003
quotequote all

Stig said: Don't worry, the UK's war effort is being funded by the congestion charge and road tax.

Well it must be, 'cos there's fcuk all evidence of it being spent anywhere else!


specially if your car is over 4.0ltr....twats

Captain Muppet

8,540 posts

296 months

Tuesday 25th March 2003
quotequote all

minimax said:

polar_ben said:

Martin Hunt said:So why £1.7 Billion?
Tomahawk missile - $500,000 each
Apache helicopter - $16 million each
Tornado fighter - $27 million each
MOAB bomb - $27,000 each

etc.

Won't be doing the US national debt much good



I thought the tomahawk cruise missiles were £1 million each? either way it's a lot of cash to be throwing overboard.


Maybe they're getting a bulk discount?

Bonce

4,339 posts

310 months

Tuesday 25th March 2003
quotequote all
One Tomahawk missile - $500,000
One Apache helicopter - $16 million
One Tornado fighter - $27 million
One MOAB bomb - $27,000

- Neglecting to get UN Authorisation for the war... priceless.



>> Edited by Bonce on Tuesday 25th March 12:01

robkola

1,589 posts

295 months

Tuesday 25th March 2003
quotequote all
But they would have had all this "in stock"

Well . . .you can't leave all these weapons lying around stockpiling in the Nevada Desert - they'll be past their sell-by date!

Strange about the US debt - it's the same per capita as when Reagan was in (Star Wars, Cold Wars) and seemed to 'disappear' with Clinton.




Bonce said: One Tomahawk missile - $500,000
One Apache helicopter - $16 million
One Tornado fighter - $27 million
One MOAB bomb - $27,000

- Neglecting to get UN Authorisation for the war... priceless.



>> Edited by Bonce on Tuesday 25th March 12:01




>> Edited by robkola on Tuesday 25th March 12:28

Supercharged

102 posts

284 months

Tuesday 25th March 2003
quotequote all
I can remember seeing something a while ago saying a lot of the British missiles were on the verge of passing their 'use by date'

Maybe thats whats this is all about...

When Tesco have a load of, lets say trifles, that are about to go off they put them in a reduced fridge.

When the MOD have a large number of missiles that are about to 'go off' they use them against a middle eastern rogue dictator

robp

5,823 posts

295 months

Tuesday 25th March 2003
quotequote all

plotloss said: Its quite startling to think that the £38bn that gets extracted from the combined pockets of 20 million motorists in 12 months wouldnt run the war for 30 days...


Dont give em ideas!
Those fines might begin to creep up

cnh1990

3,035 posts

294 months

Tuesday 25th March 2003
quotequote all

robkola said: Strange about the US debt - it's the same per capita as when Reagan was in (Star Wars, Cold Wars) and seemed to 'disappear' with Clinton.



That's because he had a different definition or he did not consider the it debt.

Just like he did not consider oral sex being performed on him as sexual relations. If I tried that explanation with my wife I surely would be killed.
Calvin

kevinday

13,875 posts

311 months

Wednesday 26th March 2003
quotequote all
To put a new slant on this, I believe that during the '91 Gulf War the price of petrol/gas and other oil products in the US rose to an extent sufficient for the increased profit and taxes to fund the whole of the war effort and for the US government to actually make a profit.