Rio Ferdinand BANNED for 6 months
Rio Ferdinand BANNED for 6 months
Author
Discussion

mrs fish

Original Poster:

30,018 posts

289 months

Monday 31st March 2003
quotequote all
Banned Rio Ferdinand faces 'serious inconvenience'

Rio Ferdinand's solicitor says the footballer faces six months of "serious incovenience" after being banned from driving.

The 24-year-old Manchester United player, who did not attend Leeds Magistrates Court, was also fined £2,500 and ordered to pay costs of £3,000.

The England defender was convicted earlier this month of speeding on the M1 motorway near Temple Newsam, Leeds in his Cadillac Escalade.

He was clocked speeding at an average of 92mph on the southbound carriageway on March 1 last year.

District Judge Roy Anderson told Ferdinand's solicitor, Barry Warburton, that he was imposing the maximum fine and a six-month ban.

He said: "That is the maximum, but it is plainly derisory when compared with his earnings."

Ferdinand, of Linton Common, West Yorkshire, who already had nine points for previous speeding convictions, was also given six more points for the latest driving offence.

CarZee

13,382 posts

298 months

Monday 31st March 2003
quotequote all
My heart bleeds for him

mrflibbles

7,794 posts

314 months

Monday 31st March 2003
quotequote all
make a change from the celebs getting off scot -free.

i think a sixmonth ban seems a bit harsh IMHO

nicholasblair

4,111 posts

315 months

Monday 31st March 2003
quotequote all
Fair do's - Didn't know Cadillac's went that fast though.

smifffy

2,000 posts

297 months

Monday 31st March 2003
quotequote all
Well, my heart does indeed bleed for him, but 6 months for 92 mph is well over the top (imho)

swilly

9,699 posts

305 months

Monday 31st March 2003
quotequote all
£2500 and £3000 costs......isn't that how much he earns as he gets out of bed in the morning.

CarZee

13,382 posts

298 months

Monday 31st March 2003
quotequote all
the harshness and of the penalty and the 6 month ban are because he already has 9 points from previous offences

jeremyc

28,352 posts

315 months

Monday 31st March 2003
quotequote all

smifffy said: ... but 6 months for 92 mph is well over the top (imho)
It was six points, which added to his existing nine busted him.

Still, 6 points for 92mph is over the top, but deserved if you're going to ponce about in a Cadillac Esplanade or whatever it is.

mrs fish

Original Poster:

30,018 posts

289 months

Monday 31st March 2003
quotequote all
Carzee, JC....beat me to it

dazren

22,612 posts

292 months

Monday 31st March 2003
quotequote all
The magistrate quite rightly pointed out that the monetary fine is an irrelevance to the driver in question. I am a little perterbed as to how the prosecutions costs ran to £3k though.

6 pts for 92 on a motorway is well over the top as well. Should be 3 points.

DAZ

(Rio, if you're a lurking PHer do the decent thing mate. Pay the fine and costs then bugger off abroad and don't pay millions in income tax on your club salary to this corrupt government.)

>> Edited by dazren on Monday 31st March 16:08

CarZee

13,382 posts

298 months

Monday 31st March 2003
quotequote all
Daz - I suspect that the only reason he had to go to court was because a 3pt FPN would have seen him banned by totting up, and hence he had to go to court as a ban was inevitable.. it was only because he went to court that the magistrate was able to "make an example of him".

Had he not had the 9 points already, I rather suspect he'd have got the same 3pt/£60 as anyone else.

robkola

1,589 posts

295 months

Monday 31st March 2003
quotequote all
Why didn't he try the Beckham "I thought I was being followed" line?

dave_s13

14,031 posts

300 months

Monday 31st March 2003
quotequote all
Serves him right for driving such a w@nky looking motor

[img]www.motortrend.com/motor/roadtests/suv/112_0101cad_lead.jpg[/img]

CarZee

13,382 posts

298 months

Monday 31st March 2003
quotequote all
Because he already had 9 points and the magistrate would have laughed then locked him up for contempt of court.

Perhaps he should have tried that line..

smifffy

2,000 posts

297 months

Monday 31st March 2003
quotequote all

jeremyc said:

smifffy said: ... but 6 months for 92 mph is well over the top (imho)
It was six points, which added to his existing nine busted him.

Still, 6 points for 92mph is over the top, but deserved if you're going to ponce about in a Cadillac Esplanade or whatever it is.



Yeah, fair point.

Multimillionaire and driving one of those. Throw the freaking book at 'im.

dazren

22,612 posts

292 months

Monday 31st March 2003
quotequote all

CarZee said: Daz - I suspect that the only reason he had to go to court was because a 3pt FPN would have seen him banned by totting up, and hence he had to go to court as a ban was inevitable.. it was only because he went to court that the magistrate was able to "make an example of him".

Had he not had the 9 points already, I rather suspect he'd have got the same 3pt/£60 as anyone else.

Carzee I agree with you that the reason for RF's case going to court is the 3 points for the offence would take him to 12 and an automatic ban. Fair enough. I just do not feel the magistrate should be dishing out 6 points in some sort of power crazed "I'm gonna make an example out of this famous motorist".

Alternatively the fact RF did not attend court himself may have miffed the magistrates big time, giving them the impression he was not taking the severity of the "toting up ban" seriously enough.

Still I look forward to seeing Rio being driven about by some long legged chauffeuse in a sparkling Bentley Convertible with a glass of champers/can of Kronenbourg (delete no-applicable) on the go.

Yep, he'll be suffering.

cheers

DAZ

(92mph, Hmmmmm I wonder what that sort of speed feels like? I reckon I'd be terrified)

CarZee

13,382 posts

298 months

Monday 31st March 2003
quotequote all

dazren said: Carzee I agree with you that the reason for RF's case going to court is the 3 points for the offence would take him to 12 and an automatic ban. Fair enough. I just do not feel the magistrate should be dishing out 6 points in some sort of power crazed "I'm gonna make an example out of this famous motorist".
hmm... perhaps, but the magistrates are in a damned if they do and damned if they don't..

If they give him 3pts and £60 then a bunch of 'civvies' moan about special treatment for celebs..

if they give him more, they're being unfair in making an example of him..

IMO the magistrate acted in accordance with the fact that Mr Ferdinand's record shows he clearly has no regard whatsoever for motoring law (neither do we but we're evidently better at not getting caught - but tthen we don't drive Wurlitzer Jukeboxes to work ).

FWIW I once got a FPN for 56 in a 40 from Vascar. My license was at DVLA for re-addressing and hence I couldn't produce. DVLA wouldn't give me a cover note... whatever procedure was in place for establishing my entitlement to drive in legitimate absence of paperwork clearly failed as plod in Leeds said nah bollocks you have to go to court.

They then sent the summons to the old address on my license (fcuk knows how they managed that.. ) which I didn't get until after the court date. I later found that I'd been given 5pts and £175 fine, £25 costs in my absence

alunr

1,676 posts

295 months

Monday 31st March 2003
quotequote all

dazren said:(92mph, Hmmmmm I wonder what that sort of speed feels like? I reckon I'd be terrified)

To you - Id guess SLOW! (just had a look at the profile!)

Hates_

778 posts

284 months

Monday 31st March 2003
quotequote all
TBH I wouldn't be surprised if he just drove without a license. 9pts? Didn't show up to court? Sounds like blant disregard for the law?

dazren

22,612 posts

292 months

Monday 31st March 2003
quotequote all
Carzee.

Sorry to hear about your experience of "tick box justice", oops you didn't jump through the hoops properly sir have a few more points. I had a similar experience but with less disasterous results. Back in 1996 I got pulled over by a hairdrier attendant and given seven days to produce docs and hand my license in (42 in a 30 which I thought was a 40). As I was going on a hooning holiday in France three days later, I advised the haidrier attendant I'll take the court date instead of the three points as I can't hand my licence in within the prescribed seven days. I wrote a long letter doing the grovelly bit and explaing why I was having to waste the courts time due to being unable to hand my licence in. They gave me 3 points and a £48 fine. To think I was miffed at having to pay the extra 8 quid. Thank god my case wasn't heard by the zealots dealing with yours.

DAZ