Latest edition of EVO - quite splendid!
Latest edition of EVO - quite splendid!
Author
Discussion

granville

Original Poster:

18,764 posts

292 months

Saturday 5th April 2003
quotequote all
Quick spot of unrestrained trumpetting for the latest edition.

Cover story just excellent: Tuscan S v Ruf 996 Turbo v Zonda S v RS4-engined Elise v Bimoto (twin engined) 740 bhp Audi TT for a shot at 200 mph on Germany's autobahns...I simply wept at the concept.*

A section from the doyens of the supercar testing fraternities' memoirs featuring memorable 'jousts' () of yore...blowing away some upstarts in a Vanquish; 190 in a Countach and some flexing in a 959...the stuff of legend.

Old man Fraser's 'Broadside' sweep at our archaic NSL in comparison to the less fettered joys of Italian strada hooning and the usual revealing, wry analysis of our velocitous constraints thereafter.

A guide on buying that most imperfect of now high value thoroughbred branded jewels, the Maser 3200GT (always a vastly underrated piece of kit, based on my limited experience).

And the boy Meaden displaying barely concealed euphoria at custody of their new long term mastercraft, the utterly wonderful, surely timeless elegance of the latest Callum designed revamp, the bellicose rumbler par excellence, the almighty DB7 GT.

I think I devoured the publication in less than an hour.

Thank you Mr. Metcalfe; you're up there with Petrol Ted. (Well, nearly. Fawn, slurp, bow & indeed, scrape.)

* In honour of this story I attempted a form of replication...

Speed really does matter!

>>> Edited by derestrictor on Saturday 5th April 16:23

planetdave

9,922 posts

284 months

Saturday 5th April 2003
quotequote all
Letters page was good. Some nice BiB explaing why scameras are shite. Not fair that the 'mekon' gets to play with an aston long term; it makes me sick (is that jealousy?)

BCA

8,651 posts

288 months

Saturday 5th April 2003
quotequote all
Richard Porter is superb - even though Russel Bulgin will never be replaced, Mr SniffPetrol is doing as good a job, if slightly different.

Excellent edition.

clanger

1,087 posts

289 months

Saturday 5th April 2003
quotequote all
Yep, suberb article - but would like to see it followed up with test on N'ring with same cars - introduce the twisties as well as dragster autobahn performance for realistic comparison.

ultimapaul

3,949 posts

295 months

Sunday 6th April 2003
quotequote all
The article by Gordon Murray is quite, well, superb! Showing that even someone with his experience can still hoon when the time is right.

Jousting with a 'quick' superbike and really taking the pi$$ with the 7-series.

Jon D, your a very lucky man.

Paul

RichB

56,464 posts

315 months

Monday 7th April 2003
quotequote all
Not a bad edition but they still insist on filling several pages with stuff on 4x4's !!! If I want to read about SUV's I will buy "Truck Driver's Monthly" not bloddy EVO. Even some prick in the letters pages telling us we don't understand the concept of SUV's - I DON'T CARE ! Rich...

granville

Original Poster:

18,764 posts

292 months

Monday 7th April 2003
quotequote all

RichB said: Not a bad edition but they still insist on filling several pages with stuff on 4x4's !!! If I want to read about SUV's I will buy "Truck Driver's Monthly" not bloddy EVO. Even some prick in the letters pages telling us we don't understand the concept of SUV's - I DON'T CARE ! Rich...


Agreed. But I genuinely think there has to be some kind of reluctant acknowledgement of the hideous Cayenne's ridiculous ability for something so disgracefully profligate? What was it - as fast round that circuit as an M3? Dear God!


RichB

56,464 posts

315 months

Monday 7th April 2003
quotequote all
It's not just the Cayenne, it's the whole ethos of continuously reviewing 4x4's be it the BMW, the Porsche, the Overflinch, Maseratti, Alfa and god knows what next. They should just let them pass without comment or acknowledgement. Other mags (and there are hundreds to chose from) do it prefectly well for those who need to know about these things. Rich...

jondokic

385 posts

298 months

Monday 7th April 2003
quotequote all

ultimapaul said:Jon D, your a very lucky man.


Assuming you're addressing me, thank you, why in particular ?
I haven't seen a decent car magazine for 6 weeks (Back issues of Road & Track do not count...) so a trip to the newsstand is in order shortly
And stop slagging off the Cayenne, it might look like some little-known aquatic species from three miles deep, but its chassis is simply staggering, and it's not a BMW

>> Edited by jondokic on Monday 7th April 13:00

robp

5,823 posts

295 months

Monday 7th April 2003
quotequote all

RichB said: It's not just the Cayenne, it's the whole ethos of continuously reviewing 4x4's be it the BMW, the Porsche, the Overflinch, Maseratti, Alfa and god knows what next. They should just let them pass without comment or acknowledgement. Other mags (and there are hundreds to chose from) do it prefectly well for those who need to know about these things. Rich...


Agree there, SUV's and 4X4's dont deserve the column space! The magazine argues that some of these cars (Cayenne for example) display "EVONESS" and therefore should be included.
that!
My fiesta has more "EVONESS" than those bloody two tonne buses for housewives.

kevinday

13,888 posts

311 months

Monday 7th April 2003
quotequote all
I have now seen a Cayenne S and a Cayenne Turbo. The first thought that came to mind with the Turbo was - Not much ground clearance for an SUV. It looked similar clearance to the Audi Allroad, rather than a Range Rover.

simonrockman

7,136 posts

286 months

Monday 7th April 2003
quotequote all
I think an extra-special SUV - like a Cayenne - can have Evoness, just as a 205GTi certainly does. It's a matter of being a drivers car within its limitations.

Agree on it being a splendid issue. When I worked in magazines I noted a phenomenon of doing alternating good and bad issues. You put so much into one you ran out of time on the next, the one after was great again and so on. EVO has this on an upward curve, the Speed issue is better than the Power issue, but the one in-between was weaker.

I noted in the Sunday Times that Rowan Atkinson says he’s taking a year off acting. The stuff he wrote for Car was great, it would be a real coup if Evo could get him.

plotloss

67,280 posts

301 months

Monday 7th April 2003
quotequote all
Magnum RT/10 and the F150 Lightning have EVO appeal by the shedload and they are pickups!

Matt.

simonrockman

7,136 posts

286 months

Monday 7th April 2003
quotequote all
One trend I'm not sure about is the constant track-car-with-numberplates stuff. In my view that's the territory of Cars and Car Conversions.

Fatboy

8,270 posts

303 months

Monday 7th April 2003
quotequote all

And stop slagging off the Cayenne, it might look like some little-known aquatic species from three miles deep, but its chassis is simply staggering, and it's not a BMW

Same applies to the smart car - doesn't mean I've got to be nice about it (BTW that's staggering as in staggeringly awful in the smart's case )

RichB

56,464 posts

315 months

Monday 7th April 2003
quotequote all

jondokic said: And stop slagging off the Cayenne
I wasn't - I was just saying that I am not interested in reading about them in a magazine that claims to be the spiritual hier to Parformance Car and Fast Lane!

"Car" and "Top Gear" mag are generic, EVO needs to differentiate itself - not follow the crowd, else it will soon be just like all the rest. Rich...

Chris_N

1,232 posts

289 months

Monday 7th April 2003
quotequote all

RichB said: It's not just the Cayenne, it's the whole ethos of continuously reviewing 4x4's be it the BMW, the Porsche, the Overflinch, Maseratti, Alfa and god knows what next. They should just let them pass without comment or acknowledgement. Other mags (and there are hundreds to chose from) do it prefectly well for those who need to know about these things. Rich...


You could always just not read those particular articles!

Personally, when I'm trying to decide whether the Cayenne (for instance) is a total waste of space or a useful contribution to the automotive world, I'd rather read the opinion of journalists whose views I respect so I can form a reasoned opinion.

All credit to them for being open-minded about what they review.

RichB

56,464 posts

315 months

Monday 7th April 2003
quotequote all

Chris_N said: You could always just not read those particular articles!
Christ - I was only saying it doesn't interest me - I didn't want to start world war III And I WASN'T slagging off the cAyenne, I've never driven one and probabaly never will.



RichB

56,464 posts

315 months

Monday 7th April 2003
quotequote all
Oh and p.s. your comment is a bit daft. It;s not like it's a free-sheet, the mag costs £3.60, therefore I rather like to read the articles rather than skip half. R...

Chris_N

1,232 posts

289 months

Monday 7th April 2003
quotequote all
Rich B - just a bit of friendly discussion!

My point is just that if the EVO team did a mega-test of ride on lawn mowers I wouldn't be interested because my garden is small so it would have no relevance and I would skim over it. However, I would be glad to know that should I ever move and need a ride on mower I could get the opinion of people who I know to be on the same wavelength as me as to which one I would most enjoy owning. i.e. more info is better than less.

Alright I'm talking nonsense, before anyone else says it. Still a good issue though! Reassuring to know we still live in a world where people can stick a tuned Audi RS4 engine in an Elise!

Chris