RE: M15 To Get Volvo V8?
RE: M15 To Get Volvo V8?
Monday 5th November 2007

M15 To Get Volvo V8?

With twin turbos of course


But when will we actually get to drive it?
But when will we actually get to drive it?
Being huge fans of Lee Noble’s creations here at PH, we were intrigued by news which has filtered through from Noble’s Italian importer, UK Garage.

According to them, the production version of the long-awaited M15 will feature a powerplant from a fairly unlikely source: the Volvo XC90.

Thanks to a healthy input of cash from a private investor, the larger than anticipated engine will be far from standard in this new application and, like the V6 Mondeo engine before it, will gain a couple of turbochargers to boost power to around 650bhp.

Tipping the scales at around 1,100kg, the M15 is 30% stiffer than the M12 and has better weight distribution despite the larger engine.

Performance wise, 0-60mph should be despatched in around 3.0 seconds, while UK Garage is estimating that they will market the car at around €150,000. That’s around £104,000 of our English pounds.

Author
Discussion

Gooby

Original Poster:

9,269 posts

263 months

Monday 5th November 2007
quotequote all
Isnt a volvo V8 actually a ford V8?

havoc

33,340 posts

264 months

Monday 5th November 2007
quotequote all
Gooby said:
Isnt a volvo V8 actually a ford V8?
No - the Volvo 4.4 is a transverse lump, and IIRC had some Yamaha input.

Totally different to the Jag/LR inline V8's.

GKP

15,099 posts

270 months

Monday 5th November 2007
quotequote all
One Hundred and Four Thousand Pounds.

For a Noble.

Bonkers. silly

Wadeski

9,018 posts

242 months

Monday 5th November 2007
quotequote all
if anything noble should be making CHEAPER cars not more expensive ones.

its the same delusions of grandeur that sank TVR....

"i know lets stop building popular, grunty, affordable sportscars and start building supercars. But without the badge. Or the international presence. Or the fit and finish. Everyone will want one!"


jon-

16,534 posts

245 months

Monday 5th November 2007
quotequote all
havoc said:
Gooby said:
Isnt a volvo V8 actually a ford V8?
No - the Volvo 4.4 is a transverse lump, and IIRC had some Yamaha input.

Totally different to the Jag/LR inline V8's.
Yamaha have designed some lovely engines since the 80s cloud9

Adrian W

15,493 posts

257 months

Monday 5th November 2007
quotequote all
This is news? are Ph Editorial staff in some sort of timewarp they keep regurgitating old stories.

baSkey

14,291 posts

255 months

Monday 5th November 2007
quotequote all
Adrian W said:
This is news? are Ph Editorial staff in some sort of timewarp they keep regurgitating old stories.
really? it's the first i'd heard of it to be honest...

Adrian W

15,493 posts

257 months

dkennedyvxt

242 posts

263 months

Monday 5th November 2007
quotequote all
GKP said:
One Hundred and Four Thousand Pounds.

For a Noble.

Bonkers. silly
Hope you mean bonkers in a good way...that's a lot of car for the money. I remember when Autocar drove the M15 test mule and said cross country almost nothing would touch the car. If i had the money i'd buy one....and I don;t own a noble before you ask smile

Mike400

1,026 posts

260 months

Monday 5th November 2007
quotequote all
gorgeous car, but at the end of the day you are still paying £104,000 on something that may as well have a "powered by volvo" sticker on the back

The same cash could have you sitting in something with a bit more passion?

Maybe im being harsh, its a very good looking car, the performance credentials are there and ive heard fit and finish is pretty good?

baSkey

14,291 posts

255 months

Monday 5th November 2007
quotequote all
Adrian W said:
...ah. i knew there was a reason why i shouldn't have unsubscribed..! wink

cvegas

324 posts

232 months

Monday 5th November 2007
quotequote all
See Autocar 17th October page 20 for further details of M15C and M600. 200+ mph at £100,000

dinkel

27,775 posts

287 months

Monday 5th November 2007
quotequote all
Wadeski said:
if anything Noble should be making CHEAPER cars not more expensive ones.

its the same delusions of grandeur that sank TVR....
I was almost banned for saying that . . . then.

The Noble is a great car. With 300 brake it's about as fast as it gets. You can slay most porkers and Ferrari's with it. Dropping a 200 brake Type R or Duratech won't make much difference in pricetag me thinks . . .

I'm thinking AWD . . . Is that wrong?

J111

3,354 posts

244 months

Monday 5th November 2007
quotequote all
dkennedyvxt said:
that's a lot of car for the money
Is it ? Compared to a GT3RS ?

Noble's dealer network, interior quality, and level of development ? At TVR prices, sure. Porsche/Ferrari/R8 prices ? No thanks.

robbyt

1,441 posts

234 months

Monday 5th November 2007
quotequote all
[quote=Mike400]gorgeous car, but at the end of the day you are still paying £104,000 on something that may as well have a "powered by volvo" sticker on the back

quote]

Thats like saying when buying a koenigsegg "powered by ford" , its may have the volvo unit but most likely only the block remains the same. BTW i dont own a noble

robbyt

1,441 posts

234 months

Monday 5th November 2007
quotequote all
[quote=Mike400]gorgeous car, but at the end of the day you are still paying £104,000 on something that may as well have a "powered by volvo" sticker on the back

quote]

Thats like saying when buying a koenigsegg "powered by ford" , its may have the volvo unit but most likely only the block remains the same. BTW i dont own a noble

Hendry

1,945 posts

311 months

Monday 5th November 2007
quotequote all
havoc said:
Gooby said:
Isnt a volvo V8 actually a ford V8?
No - the Volvo 4.4 is a transverse lump, and IIRC had some Yamaha input.

Totally different to the Jag/LR inline V8's.
While what you say about the Yamaha/Jaguar situation is entirely correct, I am left unsure what an "inline V8" is, given that an inline six is different from a V6.

If you mean that the Jags and Land Rovers are mounted longitudinally and the Volvo transversely (because the latter maker's cars are built for FWD first, then had AWD added) then this makes more sense, although the Volvo Yahama motor is being mounted longitudinally in the M15 I assume (as this car showed the V6 being mounted that way round).

It is meant to be a peach by the way.

baSkey

14,291 posts

255 months

Monday 5th November 2007
quotequote all
dinkel said:
Wadeski said:
if anything Noble should be making CHEAPER cars not more expensive ones.

its the same delusions of grandeur that sank TVR....
I was almost banned for saying that . . . then.

The Noble is a great car. With 300 brake it's about as fast as it gets. You can slay most porkers and Ferrari's with it. Dropping a 200 brake Type R or Duratech won't make much difference in pricetag me thinks . . .

I'm thinking AWD . . . Is that wrong?
it's true. horsepower's cheap these days.

ka20b or ls6 not a huge difference in cost but one weighs more and one gives you way more oomph...

theat 'volvo' v8 sounds like a decent motor..quite glad it's found a decent home at last...(how cool would that motor be in a VXeligopa?!).

kambites

71,458 posts

250 months

Monday 5th November 2007
quotequote all
J111 said:
dkennedyvxt said:
that's a lot of car for the money
Is it ? Compared to a GT3RS ?
I would hope that it will be significantly faster than any standard 911, both in a straight line and through the twisties smile

Windymiller

1,937 posts

269 months

Monday 5th November 2007
quotequote all
So this is actually going to be made one day? How old is the concept now?