Obama's new motor
Author
Discussion

Police State

Original Poster:

4,364 posts

249 months

Thursday 15th January 2009
quotequote all
useful... but did it have to look so cheap and ugly...



http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/7829475....



Edited by Police State on Thursday 15th January 01:10


Edited by Police State on Thursday 15th January 01:11

tomTVR

6,909 posts

270 months

Thursday 15th January 2009
quotequote all
He should get some 24" spinners on that bad boy.

A1GOY

1,521 posts

231 months

Thursday 15th January 2009
quotequote all
Dame Edna in braces?

190E Matt

6,635 posts

243 months

Thursday 15th January 2009
quotequote all
rofl That is revolting to the extreme

BigE1967

132 posts

217 months

Thursday 15th January 2009
quotequote all
I understand the need for function...the President's car has an unbelievable amount of hidden technology. it is one ugly car! The older style Cadillac made a much nicer looking President-mobile

PJR

2,616 posts

241 months

Thursday 15th January 2009
quotequote all
Police State said:
useful... but did it have to look so cheap and ugly...
Thats just how most American cars are. So this one is no exception.

P,

B16JUS

2,386 posts

266 months

Thursday 15th January 2009
quotequote all
i suspect its bullet / bomb proof and has its own air supply lol

edited to add yea just read it lol

Edited by B16JUS on Thursday 15th January 01:34

Bravia

29 posts

212 months

Thursday 15th January 2009
quotequote all
Wonder if the driver has one wrist on the top of the steering wheel with his watch hanging off :scratchchin"

Jimbeaux

33,791 posts

260 months

Thursday 15th January 2009
quotequote all
PJR said:
Police State said:
useful... but did it have to look so cheap and ugly...
Thats just how most American cars are. So this one is no exception.

P,
There is a new ignorance tax in the UK so watch yourself, it could get expensive for you wink

L4MBOLUV3R

1,935 posts

224 months

BigE1967

132 posts

217 months

Thursday 15th January 2009
quotequote all
PJR said:
Police State said:
useful... but did it have to look so cheap and ugly...
Thats just how most American cars are. So this one is no exception.

P,
People that live in glass houses......

Exoticaholic

1,087 posts

241 months

Thursday 15th January 2009
quotequote all
Brawn before beauty. With 3" thick glass and steel up to 8" thick in some areas, and overkill here and there. Hey, this is the result, Mr. President.

Andy Mac

73,668 posts

284 months

Thursday 15th January 2009
quotequote all
Jimbeaux said:
PJR said:
Police State said:
useful... but did it have to look so cheap and ugly...
Thats just how most American cars are. So this one is no exception.

P,
There is a new ignorance tax in the UK so watch yourself, it could get expensive for you wink
Come on Jim... Even you must admit there are some humdingers in the US! Grand Prix, grans Am's, Aztecs, those hideous plastic saturns, the cadillacs, etc!

SpunkyMonkey

425 posts

224 months

Thursday 15th January 2009
quotequote all
I want to know what it transforms into!

LuS1fer

43,478 posts

274 months

Thursday 15th January 2009
quotequote all
I suspect John Kennedy would have liked it so much that he didn't give a flying sh*t what it looked like. Get real, it's a frickin' security cell, not a car. What shall we discuss next? The styling of the Warburton's bread vans?

Andy Mac

73,668 posts

284 months

Thursday 15th January 2009
quotequote all
LuS1fer said:
I suspect John Kennedy would have liked it so much that he didn't give a flying sh*t what it looked like. Get real, it's a frickin' security cell, not a car. What shall we discuss next? The styling of the Warburton's bread vans?
Really? You knew JFK that well? I'm astounded. Anyway, this thread is about how crappy it looks... Nothing more, nothing less. This is a car forum you know.

CY88

2,808 posts

259 months

Thursday 15th January 2009
quotequote all
Do you think he'll have the custom fabric badges...



Bush's one looked rubbish too...




Armoured Range Rover... much nicer... http://www.pistonheads.com/doc.asp?c=47&i=1511...



The State Bentley






Edited by CY88 on Thursday 15th January 09:31

LuS1fer

43,478 posts

274 months

Thursday 15th January 2009
quotequote all
Andy Mac said:
LuS1fer said:
I suspect John Kennedy would have liked it so much that he didn't give a flying sh*t what it looked like. Get real, it's a frickin' security cell, not a car. What shall we discuss next? The styling of the Warburton's bread vans?
Really? You knew JFK that well? I'm astounded. Anyway, this thread is about how crappy it looks... Nothing more, nothing less. This is a car forum you know.
The clue was "I suspect" rather than "I know" although having been shot through the head, I feel confident in my analysis.

I think it looks OK for an armoured limo which, in general, look awful regardless. It certainly looks no worse than the State Bentley.

Can't imagine any stretched car that actually looks good. Maybach for example.

Jimbeaux

33,791 posts

260 months

Thursday 15th January 2009
quotequote all
Andy Mac said:
Jimbeaux said:
PJR said:
Police State said:
useful... but did it have to look so cheap and ugly...
Thats just how most American cars are. So this one is no exception.

P,
There is a new ignorance tax in the UK so watch yourself, it could get expensive for you wink
Come on Jim... Even you must admit there are some humdingers in the US! Grand Prix, grans Am's, Aztecs, those hideous plastic saturns, the cadillacs, etc!
Some on that list yes....others....have you only tried the rentals?

Police State

Original Poster:

4,364 posts

249 months

Thursday 15th January 2009
quotequote all
LuS1fer said:
I suspect John Kennedy would have liked it so much that he didn't give a flying sh*t what it looked like. Get real, it's a frickin' security cell, not a car. What shall we discuss next? The styling of the Warburton's bread vans?
It can still look nice and less cheap looking regardless of its function. It could if they so desired, even look pretty...