Traffic Flows in London - What's Happened????
Traffic Flows in London - What's Happened????
Author
Discussion

robm3

Original Poster:

4,930 posts

250 months

Monday 27th July 2009
quotequote all
I've not been driving in Central London for about four/five years but on Saturday went in twice (midday and 8pm from Muswell Hill).

And all I can say is what's happened to the traffic flow system????

Once my light turned green, the one 200m down the road turns red, therefore the group of cars move off only to brake again 15 seconds later?
I also noticed it added to congestion as people tended to block intersections more frequently and I could plainly see how. You just don't expect to stop 10-15 seconds after your direct light turns green.

This happened countless times driving through the capital.

Does anyone know why the lights have suddenly got "mucked up"?





Matt_N

8,991 posts

225 months

Monday 27th July 2009
quotequote all
To create artificial congestion that justifies the Congestion Charging.

sleep envy

62,260 posts

272 months

Monday 27th July 2009
quotequote all
Ken Livingstone

I've noticed that a number of the worst are being rephased to get traffic flow moving again - Ken increased the time spent on red to allow the peds to cross at their leisure

timbob

2,193 posts

275 months

Monday 27th July 2009
quotequote all
I've noticed a similar thing since moving to Northampton.

If you come to a stop at one set of lights and move off as they turn green, as you're nearing the next set, they turn red. Move off from them, the next set turns red... It's not just a random occurance either, it's the same every single time you go through the town centre.

Bedford is different, if you catch one green a good number of lights often turn green just as you approach.

I remember a conversation with a friend of a friend, who worked for the road safety/traffic calming department in the local district council down in Wiltshire. It's apparently all to do with average vehicle speed through the town. A lower average speed equals a "safer" town centre, and helps with councils meeting their road safety targets.

Scrumper

318 posts

205 months

Monday 27th July 2009
quotequote all
Ken did it. Boris has ordered that the traffic lights be re-phased to as to improve traffic flow; he recognises that cars sat idling at red lights produce far more pollution than those moving freely.

Transport for London (TfL) is the Ken-created body that is responsible for implementing the mayor's orders. Unfortunately it's staffed by car-hating ideologues and it may be the case that they have intepreted his instructions for lights to spend less time on red literally, without considering the spirit (phase them so traffic actually moves).

I've lived and driven in London since the year Ken came to power and I haven't yet noticed a consistent improvement in traffic flow since Boris started. I'll give Boris the benefit of the doubt for now. There has been a simply incredible amount of road digging since he took office and his plans won't have had time to be fully implemented yet.

robm3

Original Poster:

4,930 posts

250 months

Monday 27th July 2009
quotequote all
timbob said:
I remember a conversation with a friend of a friend, who worked for the road safety/traffic calming department in the local district council down in Wiltshire. It's apparently all to do with average vehicle speed through the town. A lower average speed equals a "safer" town centre, and helps with councils meeting their road safety targets.
Ah, that has some twisted government logic. However surely you are actually causing (trapping) more cars for longer in built up urban areas, thus increasing risk of accidents pedestrian or otherwise to occur??

AndrewW-G

11,968 posts

240 months

Monday 27th July 2009
quotequote all
It's to help with global warming, with all that stoping and starting we may even end up with a decent summer in the end smile or maybe more joined up thinking from the alcoholic lunatic that used to run london

grumbledoak

32,363 posts

256 months

Monday 27th July 2009
quotequote all
Matt_N said:
To create artificial congestion that justifies the Congestion Charging.
^^^ This.

Ken fking Livingstone.

The re-phasing of the traffic lights near me to fk everything up was so blatant it was almost laughable. It's got better since Boris, though it isn't there yet, so more power to him.

CampDavid

9,145 posts

221 months

Monday 27th July 2009
quotequote all
timbob said:
I've noticed a similar thing since moving to Northampton.

If you come to a stop at one set of lights and move off as they turn green, as you're nearing the next set, they turn red. Move off from them, the next set turns red... It's not just a random occurance either, it's the same every single time you go through the town centre.

Bedford is different, if you catch one green a good number of lights often turn green just as you approach.

I remember a conversation with a friend of a friend, who worked for the road safety/traffic calming department in the local district council down in Wiltshire. It's apparently all to do with average vehicle speed through the town. A lower average speed equals a "safer" town centre, and helps with councils meeting their road safety targets.
Indeed, Bedford isn't actually a bad town to get through, much, much better than Northampton.

The phasing of lights around Moorgate is appalling. It can only be the work of an idiot or it's got the intention of reducing trafic flow. Brilliantly there are islands halfway accross for pedestrians however thegreen man will only appear when all trafic lights are red. It's designed to slow everyone down.

Guybrush

4,364 posts

229 months

Monday 27th July 2009
quotequote all
Communists dislike personal freedom / freedom of movement. They'll do anything to impede it, no matter that it wastes fuel, time and creates additional pollution. Boris is trying to reverse Livingstone's destructive time in office, but I imagine there are Livingstone supporters still in jobs trying to make attempts at efficiency improvements as difficult as possible.

gareth_r

6,557 posts

260 months

Tuesday 28th July 2009
quotequote all
Perhaps they are still operating the old government policy on traffic light phasing. It will be OK once they catch up.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7998182.stm

Motorists should face fewer red lights following the relaxation of government guidance on the flow of traffic.
Local councils can adopt "green wave" systems of sensors, where vehicles at or just below the speed limit trigger a succession of green lights. Environmental and motoring groups say carbon emissions will be reduced.
Previously the Department for Transport (DfT) had discouraged the systems, which reduce fuel use, resulting in less tax being paid to the Treasury, but now, rather than seeing green wave systems as a "cost" to the public purse, the DfT views them as a "benefit".


Edited by gareth_r on Tuesday 28th July 00:25

anonymous-user

77 months

Tuesday 28th July 2009
quotequote all
Southampton is an absolute nightmare for this. I'm glad to be gone frankly, it was one of the only places I've found myself getting angry driving. Cardiff is bliss by comparison.