RE: Driven: BMW 3 Series Coupe And Convertible
RE: Driven: BMW 3 Series Coupe And Convertible
Thursday 25th March 2010

Driven: BMW 3 Series Coupe And Convertible

Fresh faces and revised engines for 2010 range tweaks



At first sight there's not a great deal of difference between the old and new versions of BMW's 3 series Coupe and Convertible, but close inspection reveals a few significant novelties.


If you can't make out the details, you're looking at front and rear overhangs that are 29mm and 3mm (yes really!) longer than their predecessors, a wider kidney grille with chrome detailing, and revised lower air intakes with silver trim bars next to the fog lamps. The headlamps have also been re-profiled and feature BMW's 'quad-ring' effect with an LED and Adaptive Light option that follows the steering, among its various tricks. The rear lights feature new single colour red lenses, while the sides get a new set of door mirrors and the sills are slightly modified too.


Under the bonnet, there's a new 2.0-engined 318i entry-model, with lean burn injection delivering 143hp at 6,000rpm and 140lb ft at 4,250rpm. That's enough to take you from 0-62mph in 9.1secs in the Coupe or 10.3 in the slightly heavier Convertible. But you can get 44.8mph in the combined economy cycle, should you be so minded.

Fortunately, on our little day trip to Munich for the 2010 version launch, BMW thoughtfully provided PH with a more entertaining option in the shape of 335i SE versions of both.


This is the latest incarnation of the classic BMW straight six, which combines TwinPower Turbo Technology (a single twin-scroll unit, as opposed to the twin-turbos of old), High Precision Injection and VALVETRONIC variable valve adjustment for the first time on this engine.

From a 3.0 displacement, the result is a maximum power output of 306hp at 5,800rpm, and 295lb ft from 1,200 to 5,000rpm. As BMW points out, that's pretty much what you'd expect from a decent V8, but with the added benefit of 33.6mpg on EU official figures. In effect, you're getting the same dynamic performance as the old twin-turbo, with roughly 10percent greater efficiency.


Those updates and a few tweaks to the trim and paint options aside, the only other significant development is the adoption of new dampers across the 3-series range. The new Sachs units feature novel internal valve springs to control oil flow that are made up of a stack of flat disc-shaped 'leaves' of diminishing diameters. The new leaf springs apparently mean progressively adjustable response to bumps can be dialled in, whereas the old dampers' coil springs offered only linear compression.

Out on the (typically smoothly surfaced) roads we found around Munich (and on Winter tyres), it was impossible to evaluate how much difference these dampers will make to ride comfort here in the UK, but the BMW boffins are confident they perform better over low speed imperfections.


What was clear from our drive however, was how competent the chassis set-up remains, and how well this typically smooth six suits the car in both coupe and cabrio form.

It's no rocket-ship (there's an M3 in the range for that), but it's certainly potent, and eagerly piles on the revs. BMW quotes a 5.5sec 0-62mph sprint for the coupe, and 5.8sec for the Convertible, and both cars feel quick off the mark. In our case this sense of rapid progress is aided by the optional seven-speed double-clutch gearbox (the same unit that we're currently enjoying in the PH fleet M3), which really does offer lightning shifts and helps deliver near seamless power to the rear wheels. You can have flappy-paddles with it, too, which is a far nicer alternative to the back-and-forward stick shift when you want to go manual.


The steering is accurate, and weights-up nicely at speed, while the handling is more than up to scratch too, with a decently flat cornering stance and plenty of grip from the front tyres. The rears are deftly restrained by various degrees of electronic intervention from benign to playful, so there's never going to be much of an excuse for falling-off backwards.

The Coupe would typically be considered the more 'sporting' choice, but not having driven a 3 Series Convertible for a while, I think I preferred it. The Coupe suffers a little from wind noise at motorway cruising speed - which you would be less inclined to think about in the Convertible - but it also leaves you more isolated from the six's engaging engine note. In the Convertible with the roof down, the engine is a more entertaining companion, and (on the right day and the right road) the open car definitely offers more of that 'joy of motoring' thing. With the rigid roof up, it's refined and practical too, although you wouldn't find me arguing too hard with anyone who suggests the image lacks a certain, er, 'manly vigour'...



 

Author
Discussion

daveco

Original Poster:

4,418 posts

238 months

Thursday 25th March 2010
quotequote all
Boot looks smaller than the E46 derivative. You get the sense BMW know that the 318 owners care little for performance; same power output for the last 10 years!

TheRoadWarrior

1,242 posts

209 months

Thursday 25th March 2010
quotequote all
How do you know your car is too heavy?

"That's enough to take you from 0-62mph in 9.1secs in the Coupe or 10.3 in the slightly heavier Convertible. "

When your 2L car takes over 10seconds to get to 60!!

teamHOLDENracing

5,105 posts

298 months

Thursday 25th March 2010
quotequote all
Interesting to see a car with a 0-60 time of 5.5 seconds described as 'no rocket ship'!

Morba

621 posts

208 months

Thursday 25th March 2010
quotequote all
how about a pic of the luggage space with the roof down ;]


Zod

35,295 posts

289 months

Thursday 25th March 2010
quotequote all
Morba said:
how about a pic of the luggage space with the roof down ;]
you can't show a picture of nothing.

LewisR

678 posts

246 months

Thursday 25th March 2010
quotequote all
...another BMW where the rear lights on the boot lid don't match those on the wings.

Hub

7,163 posts

229 months

Thursday 25th March 2010
quotequote all
Still easily the best looking BMW in the range

havoc

33,505 posts

266 months

Thursday 25th March 2010
quotequote all
article said:
Those updates and a few tweaks to the trim and paint options aside, the only other significant development is the adoption of new dampers across the 3-series range. The new Sachs units feature novel internal valve springs to control oil flow that are made up of a stack of flat disc-shaped 'leaves' of diminishing diameters. The new leaf springs apparently mean progressively adjustable response to bumps can be dialled in, whereas the old dampers' coil springs offered only linear compression.
So is it new dampers or new springs? The bit above isn't making much sense...

E21_Ross

36,729 posts

243 months

Thursday 25th March 2010
quotequote all
LewisR said:
...another BMW where the rear lights on the boot lid don't match those on the wings.
seriously, every time a new bmw comes out that's all you comment on. it's a trait of theirs, it's like you saying "another audi with drl's and a huge grill at the front"

Luca Brasi

885 posts

205 months

Thursday 25th March 2010
quotequote all
Not a fan of the new headlights.

Gizmo!

18,150 posts

240 months

Thursday 25th March 2010
quotequote all
I actually drove the "new" 335i Coupé a few weeks back (lucky old me). Bloody stunning thing in isolation. Goes like stink (obviously an M3 goes even harder!), amazingly comfortable, and for something modern, comparatively heavy and with big tyres, surprisingly tactile and adjustable when 'pushing on' (and I drive an MX5).

Have to say that if I was only allowed one car... it covers most bases!

Edited by Gizmo! on Thursday 25th March 13:26

andy-sw

311 posts

210 months

Thursday 25th March 2010
quotequote all
Luca Brasi said:
Not a fan of the new headlights.
I second this, they are not too nice. The car looks soft to me.

obscene

5,180 posts

216 months

Thursday 25th March 2010
quotequote all
daveco said:
Boot looks smaller than the E46 derivative. You get the sense BMW know that the 318 owners care little for performance; same power output for the last 10 years!
Looks the same but smaller to me, quite shocking !

Digger

17,053 posts

222 months

Thursday 25th March 2010
quotequote all
Is it me or have they set the speed-limiter a tad low on the new 2.0 model? smile

seefarr

1,884 posts

217 months

Thursday 25th March 2010
quotequote all
havoc said:
article said:
Those updates and a few tweaks to the trim and paint options aside, the only other significant development is the adoption of new dampers across the 3-series range. The new Sachs units feature novel internal valve springs to control oil flow that are made up of a stack of flat disc-shaped 'leaves' of diminishing diameters. The new leaf springs apparently mean progressively adjustable response to bumps can be dialled in, whereas the old dampers' coil springs offered only linear compression.
So is it new dampers or new springs? The bit above isn't making much sense...
As I understand it, it's talking about new leaf shaped springs in the dampers, as opposed to cart springs.

alexpa

685 posts

203 months

Thursday 25th March 2010
quotequote all
"Out on the (typically smoothly surfaced) roads we found around Munich (and on Winter tyres), it was impossible to evaluate how much difference these dampers will make to ride comfort here in the UK, but the BMW boffins are confident they perform better over low speed imperfections."

Hmm, what about over the low speed 10cm deep 20cm wide craters that are all over the place in this country. Where I live and drive it is crazy. I guess it's the same for you guys... So dangerous! They want to stop accidents and deaths on the road (camera central), well fix them!!!

When they come knocking on your door begging for a vote, don't forget to burn their ear about the roads (like it'll help...)!!

Edited by alexpa on Thursday 25th March 13:45

E21_Ross

36,729 posts

243 months

Thursday 25th March 2010
quotequote all
daveco said:
Boot looks smaller than the E46 derivative. You get the sense BMW know that the 318 owners care little for performance; same power output for the last 10 years!
it's strange, the boot does look small in that picture indeed. my old man has an E92 M3 coupe, and the boot in it is huge!

Matt_

114 posts

220 months

Thursday 25th March 2010
quotequote all
I would prefer a soft top convertible. When the metal roof is up the lines don't flow right.

I really like the Coupes though. An M-Sport in White with red leather would do me.

Charge99

133 posts

205 months

Thursday 25th March 2010
quotequote all
Bigger overhangs... that's the last thing the 3 series convertible needed!

B10BRW

360 posts

252 months

Thursday 25th March 2010
quotequote all
That photo of the case in the cabrio is misleading, you would never get that in the boot with the hood down frown

The boot space of the cabrio is a joke irked