Car dealer fined over mileage, seems a bit harsh
Car dealer fined over mileage, seems a bit harsh
Author
Discussion

Coupe_Daz

Original Poster:

387 posts

217 months

Tuesday 13th April 2010
quotequote all
Just seen this
Linky

What are peoples thoughts on the punishment? Doesn't seem like an actual lie, they said it had done 49k, its done 49k, the saleman made a idiot of himself and stated something too good to be true(saying the dash's mileage was correct at 7.5k) probably thinking he would get shot of the customer for good.
Surely bit of compo plus giving the salesman a bcensoredking/ firing him would have sufficed instead of a 8k court case?

Edited by Coupe_Daz on Tuesday 13th April 15:46

freecar

4,249 posts

218 months

Tuesday 13th April 2010
quotequote all
Ask yourself this.

Why did it end up in court?

The purchaser probably went back to try to get some goodwill from the dealer. Dealer refuses to give away £500 worth of services for mistake, ends up costing best part of 10K after costs.

I would be very susprised if the dealer hadn't been given a chance to put things right before court.

The Wookie

14,209 posts

259 months

Tuesday 13th April 2010
quotequote all
Does seem fairly harsh on the face of it... But as said, there must be more to it than that

Kevin VRs

13,880 posts

311 months

Tuesday 13th April 2010
quotequote all
From reading the linky the magistrate should be fired. The car was advertised as a 49,000 miler and sold as such. The new owner noticed the discrepancy on picking it up (or later). How can the magistrate claim she may not have bought it if she knew the real mileage?

If I was the garage (and the story is substantially correct) I would be going straight to appeal on this.

RacingTeatray

2,520 posts

247 months

Tuesday 13th April 2010
quotequote all
It's Arnold Clark. Hard to feel sorry for them.

TooLateForAName

4,935 posts

215 months

Tuesday 13th April 2010
quotequote all
But the court heard that some weeks later, when things started to go wrong with the car,

so possibly more to the whole story...

paoloh

8,617 posts

235 months

Tuesday 13th April 2010
quotequote all
freecar said:
Ask yourself this.

Why did it end up in court?

The purchaser probably went back to try to get some goodwill from the dealer. Dealer refuses to give away £500 worth of services for mistake, ends up costing best part of 10K after costs.

I would be very susprised if the dealer hadn't been given a chance to put things right before court.
Hang on, what has dealer got to put right??

Customer, "hey this car you sold me with 49k has done 49k and I want compensating"

Dealer, "err, no"

Eddie the Ead

1,703 posts

239 months

Tuesday 13th April 2010
quotequote all
It does look harsh on the face of it but like others have said, its Arnold Clark and hearing their tales of horror I guess it was only a matter of time. Maybe the judge had bought a car from them in the past.

Bullett

11,190 posts

215 months

Tuesday 13th April 2010
quotequote all
What strikes me is that she didn't drive it before purchase to notice the difference.

It also sounds like a flippant comment taken out of context and where there's blame there's a claim.


Torquey

1,961 posts

259 months

Tuesday 13th April 2010
quotequote all
The whole story smells.

If any of it is true and I'd been Mr Arnold Clark, I'd ensure the clocks were corrected long before selling any car in that situation.

oobster

7,712 posts

242 months

Tuesday 13th April 2010
quotequote all
RacingTeatray said:
It's Arnold Clark. Hard to feel sorry for them.
I agree. Not a company I would recommend to a friend or an enemy.

TooLateForAName

4,935 posts

215 months

Tuesday 13th April 2010
quotequote all
Eddie the Ead said:
Maybe the judge had bought a car from them in the past.
heherofl

General Price

6,374 posts

214 months

Tuesday 13th April 2010
quotequote all
oobster said:
RacingTeatray said:
It's Arnold Clark. Hard to feel sorry for them.
I agree. Not a company I would recommend to a friend or an enemy.
They sell over 250,000 cars a year,must be doing something right.confused

stewy68

1,826 posts

274 months

Tuesday 13th April 2010
quotequote all
The reason that Arnold Shark sell so many cars is that the put them out like food in a supermarket and don't really care about an individual customer.
I was in the trade, but never worked for them.

J500ANT

3,103 posts

270 months

Tuesday 13th April 2010
quotequote all
Apparently, according to Google, Arnold Clark Sucks wink

750turbo

6,164 posts

255 months

Tuesday 13th April 2010
quotequote all
Some tosh posted here!

They sell xxx,xxx amount of cars per year, some deals go wrong, MOST will be sorted out in the dealer.

You only EVER hear bad news.

I am sure if you look for issues with other dealer groups you will find similar problems.

And before you ask I am not an employee, although I know a fair few.

"Awaits a kicking"

Dick_Phallus

1,155 posts

215 months

Tuesday 13th April 2010
quotequote all
750turbo said:
Some tosh posted here!

They sell xxx,xxx amount of cars per year, some deals go wrong, MOST will be sorted out in the dealer.

You only EVER hear bad news.

I am sure if you look for issues with other dealer groups you will find similar problems.

And before you ask I am not an employee, although I know a fair few.

"Awaits a kicking"
How are you Arnold?

750turbo

6,164 posts

255 months

Tuesday 13th April 2010
quotequote all
Dick_Phallus said:
750turbo said:
Some tosh posted here!

They sell xxx,xxx amount of cars per year, some deals go wrong, MOST will be sorted out in the dealer.

You only EVER hear bad news.

I am sure if you look for issues with other dealer groups you will find similar problems.

And before you ask I am not an employee, although I know a fair few.

"Awaits a kicking"
How are you Arnold?
Feeling well actually!

smile
(Just as I said, PH, fekkin typical!)