Poll:

Total Members Polled: 60

Author
Discussion

dibbers006

Original Poster:

14,640 posts

249 months

Monday 19th April 2010
quotequote all
The initial message was deleted from this topic on 02 March 2024 at 12:16

soad

34,741 posts

207 months

Monday 19th April 2010
quotequote all
I know nothing, so was purely an uneducated guess (well, you did put the option there) biggrin

HTH

Curry Burns

5,620 posts

246 months

Monday 19th April 2010
quotequote all
Otters out in front hehe

Bob Fossil

954 posts

270 months

Monday 19th April 2010
quotequote all
Imagine a 180bhp Otter!

That thing would FLY! Not sure how it would handle though.

silly

edit for spelling... oh, the irony

Edited by Bob Fossil on Monday 19th April 16:19

Marf

22,907 posts

272 months

Monday 19th April 2010
quotequote all
Front or mid engine?

Curry Burns

5,620 posts

246 months

Monday 19th April 2010
quotequote all
dibbers006 said:
Okay, something along the lines of...

E30 325
Vs.
A RWD Saxo/ Mini
Vs.
a supercharged otter?

Both similar power (for their respective weights)

GC8

19,910 posts

221 months

Monday 19th April 2010
quotequote all
1987-1988 Porsche 944S. Four cylinders, sixteen valves, 2,479cc and 190BHP, if you can rev it hard enough.

GC8

19,910 posts

221 months

Monday 19th April 2010
quotequote all
Have I failed to read the thread properly again? Sorry - there wasnt a poll when I first looked though and I missed the other clues... biggrin

GC8

19,910 posts

221 months

Monday 19th April 2010
quotequote all
Id opt for short wheelbase as thatll equate to a lighter car. Itll be a lot livelier, but ultimately more fun. The 944S was my proposal for a longer wheelbased option: if you ever find yourself asking that question.....

Chris71

21,549 posts

273 months

Monday 19th April 2010
quotequote all
GC8 said:
1987-1988 Porsche 944S. Four cylinders, sixteen valves, 2,479cc and 190BHP, if you can rev it hard enough.
I thought they were criticised for offering little performance increase over a standard Otter, but with the increased complexity of 16 valves and a weak valvertrain? Personally I'd go for an Otter S2 or keep it simple with a basic 8v Otter.

Curry Burns

5,620 posts

246 months

Monday 19th April 2010
quotequote all
I like how the otter percentage is going up rofl

dylan0451

1,040 posts

222 months

Monday 19th April 2010
quotequote all
maybe he'd be swayed by 'VTEC Otter'

'VTEC Otter just kicked in, yo'

ewenm

28,506 posts

276 months

Monday 19th April 2010
quotequote all
I've no idea on the long/short wheelbase question, so otters is it for me too. however, purely aesthetically, the length:width ratio of the car should be approximately the Golden Ratio.

HTH wink

Oxygen2k10

332 posts

201 months

Monday 19th April 2010
quotequote all
180bhp Otter?

Damn that would be one quick Otter.

Damn, you get it? HA!!

tumbleweed

I will get my coat.

Edited as I was thinking about Beavers. Cock! boxedin

Edited by Oxygen2k10 on Monday 19th April 16:57

Bill

58,885 posts

286 months

Monday 19th April 2010
quotequote all
I went for the otternative option, but SWB for me.

dibbers006

Original Poster:

14,640 posts

249 months

Monday 19th April 2010
quotequote all
Oxygen2k10 said:
Edited as I was thinking about Beavers. Cock!
We all think about cock and beavers son.

smokin