Tyre Insurance.
Discussion
Does there have to be fault, puncture or blowout? I would be surprised if it was for replacing worn tyres.
If it is the case that it's only for faulty tyres then it's rather expensive.
And what are the exclusions? Do they replace like for like or cheapo's that are of the same size etc.
If it is the case that it's only for faulty tyres then it's rather expensive.
And what are the exclusions? Do they replace like for like or cheapo's that are of the same size etc.
They don't replace worn tyres, only damaged. The policies out there all have the same terms an conditions, they even cover BMW Runflats which are expensive! No excess and covers malicious damage. One tyre, and I would be up, 5 and I can't see how they make their money! Effectively you could drive over a couple of broken bottles on a Saturday night, cut 2, 3, or maybe even 4 tyres in such a way that they are irreparable, and they would replace them!!! Does sound too good to be true to me! there would be folk out there waiting until their tyres are close to illegal and slashing them for a claim!!
DrTre said:
Never having had to replace a tyre through anything other than wear in 20 years, seems a little pointless to me (notwithstanding my tyres aren't that expensive in the first place)
1 tyre in 10 years for me. I've had a few punctures. But only 1 resulted in a new tyre.I understand from my US colleagues that tyres over there can have a mileage guarantee on them!
DrTre said:
Never having had to replace a tyre through anything other than wear in 20 years, seems a little pointless to me (notwithstanding my tyres aren't that expensive in the first place)
Yes, I understand, but how many folk will be deliberately damaging tyres when they get to the wear indicator then claiming they ran over something, or hit a large pothole?What about the issue of symmetry?
2/3rds worn, replace one with a puncture, but are you then going to replace the opposing one?
Still cheaper having them replace one tyre, but not by much.
And how often is a tyre totally destroyed? I've had punctures and just repaired them, but never (touch wood) one that was unrepairable...
Hmmm
Dave
2/3rds worn, replace one with a puncture, but are you then going to replace the opposing one?
Still cheaper having them replace one tyre, but not by much.
And how often is a tyre totally destroyed? I've had punctures and just repaired them, but never (touch wood) one that was unrepairable...
Hmmm
Dave
Mr Whippy said:
What about the issue of symmetry?
2/3rds worn, replace one with a puncture, but are you then going to replace the opposing one?
Still cheaper having them replace one tyre, but not by much.
And how often is a tyre totally destroyed? I've had punctures and just repaired them, but never (touch wood) one that was unrepairable...
Hmmm
Dave
Yes but read my previous post! There WILL be folk who coincidentaly have 2 punctures at the same time, coincidentaly just as their tyres are nearing 1.6mm tread depth!2/3rds worn, replace one with a puncture, but are you then going to replace the opposing one?
Still cheaper having them replace one tyre, but not by much.
And how often is a tyre totally destroyed? I've had punctures and just repaired them, but never (touch wood) one that was unrepairable...
Hmmm
Dave
I have the tyre insurance and have claimed on it twice in the first year so it has paid for itself already!
My tyres are £130-ish each
The rule about wear is that it must have a minimum tread depth of 3mm I think for you to be able to claim a new tyre
And YES they are like for like replacements
The catch is that you have to use "KWIK-FIT" - So far I haven't had any problems though
My tyres are £130-ish each
The rule about wear is that it must have a minimum tread depth of 3mm I think for you to be able to claim a new tyre
And YES they are like for like replacements
The catch is that you have to use "KWIK-FIT" - So far I haven't had any problems though

So you got your money back this year. What about last year, what about next year? It will cost you more in the long run.
In 20 years of driving, I've never had a puncture or blowout.
Most tyres I've had are around £80 each (about the same as this policy per year) so I would have to have a LEAST 2 blowout/puncture/slash per year for it to make any sense at all.
You can be unlucky every now and again, but not twice a year every year, and that's how many claims you would need to make EVERY year for it to be worth your while.
In 20 years of driving, I've never had a puncture or blowout.
Most tyres I've had are around £80 each (about the same as this policy per year) so I would have to have a LEAST 2 blowout/puncture/slash per year for it to make any sense at all.
You can be unlucky every now and again, but not twice a year every year, and that's how many claims you would need to make EVERY year for it to be worth your while.
Edited by Dracoro on Friday 9th July 17:58
Munter said:
DrTre said:
Never having had to replace a tyre through anything other than wear in 20 years, seems a little pointless to me (notwithstanding my tyres aren't that expensive in the first place)
1 tyre in 10 years for me. I've had a few punctures. But only 1 resulted in a new tyre.I understand from my US colleagues that tyres over there can have a mileage guarantee on them!
Jimbeaux said:
Munter said:
DrTre said:
Never having had to replace a tyre through anything other than wear in 20 years, seems a little pointless to me (notwithstanding my tyres aren't that expensive in the first place)
1 tyre in 10 years for me. I've had a few punctures. But only 1 resulted in a new tyre.I understand from my US colleagues that tyres over there can have a mileage guarantee on them!
Dracoro said:
So you got your money back this year. What about last year, what about next year? It will cost you more in the long run.
In 20 years of driving, I've never had a puncture or blowout.
Most tyres I've had are around £80 each (about the same as this policy per year) so I would have to have a LEAST 2 blowout/puncture/slash per year for it to make any sense at all.
You can be unlucky every now and again, but not twice a year every year, and that's how many claims you would need to make EVERY year for it to be worth your while.
I had two tyres destroyed over 5 years by pot holes.In 20 years of driving, I've never had a puncture or blowout.
Most tyres I've had are around £80 each (about the same as this policy per year) so I would have to have a LEAST 2 blowout/puncture/slash per year for it to make any sense at all.
You can be unlucky every now and again, but not twice a year every year, and that's how many claims you would need to make EVERY year for it to be worth your while.
Edited by Dracoro on Friday 9th July 17:58
Problem was I had to replace a pair each time.
I think on both occasions I was at around 60% tread depth left.
Gassing Station | General Gassing [Archive] | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff



k! To prove anything is extremely hard. If you do buy it look at the T+C's very closely.