Signalling BEFORE looking
Signalling BEFORE looking
Author
Discussion

Tomatogti

Original Poster:

383 posts

198 months

Friday 20th August 2010
quotequote all
Is it just me, or does anyone else get annoyed by people on motorways and DCs who indicate when they want to pull out without looking to see whether it's safe to do so. So many times I'm about to pass someone when they indicates causing me to brake (if I think they're going to just pull out without looking as well). I thought it was Mirror then Signal. Normally get annoyed with those not signalling but those signalling when they shouldn't are similarly annoying and dangerous.

Tunku

7,703 posts

257 months

Friday 20th August 2010
quotequote all
I usually signal to show intention. Whether a car is approaching or not is beside the point.

Dick_Phallus

1,155 posts

213 months

Friday 20th August 2010
quotequote all
Tunku said:
I usually signal to show intention. Whether a car is approaching or not is beside the point.
This.

Flintstone

8,644 posts

276 months

Friday 20th August 2010
quotequote all
Oh Christ, here we go again rolleyes

Tomatogti

Original Poster:

383 posts

198 months

Friday 20th August 2010
quotequote all
Me too. But only soonish before I intend to do it - not when I'm about to be overtaken.

Cotty

42,226 posts

313 months

Friday 20th August 2010
quotequote all
Dick_Phallus said:
Tunku said:
I usually signal to show intention. Whether a car is approaching or not is beside the point.
This.
Yep stuck behind a MLM and waiting for the outside lane to clear I will indicate if there not yet a gap. That way they know I not another MLM and will drop a cog or two to join the lane

WhoseGeneration

4,090 posts

236 months

Friday 20th August 2010
quotequote all
Tomatogti said:
Is it just me, or does anyone else get annoyed by people on motorways and DCs who indicate when they want to pull out without looking to see whether it's safe to do so. So many times I'm about to pass someone when they indicates causing me to brake (if I think they're going to just pull out without looking as well). I thought it was Mirror then Signal. Normally get annoyed with those not signalling but those signalling when they shouldn't are similarly annoying and dangerous.
Not infallible but a clue is to look for their position in their lane.
Still well within, often means they are just signalling intention and will wait for you to pass.
If they are starting to move offside in their lane, often means they will pull out in front of you, especially if you are leaving a safe gap in your lane to the vehicle in front of you.
This all means constant scanning of those around you and trying to determine their intention whilst always having a failsafe postion for yourself.
Try to maintain that safety bubble around you, even if it means surrendering your position or progress.

coupeboy

522 posts

235 months

Friday 20th August 2010
quotequote all
Mirror, signal, check, manouver.

kazste

6,118 posts

227 months

Friday 20th August 2010
quotequote all
i normally check mirror to make sure im not going to scare someone into thinking im pulling out on them and then signal hoping that someone will let me out.

cheadle hulme

2,502 posts

211 months

Friday 20th August 2010
quotequote all
My mum and GF start to indicate when they get onto a sliproad, rather than when they are joining the carriageway.

Whats the point of that? Traffic already on the M'Way knows you're going to join it at some point. Why not make the signal actually signal something ie the point you are about to cross the hatched line?

volumeone

321 posts

193 months

Friday 20th August 2010
quotequote all
Tunku said:
I usually signal to show intention. Whether a car is approaching or not is beside the point.
Me too.

I will wait if a car is right next to me, but if theres too many cars I must indicate to show what I want to do.

Hedders

24,460 posts

276 months

Friday 20th August 2010
quotequote all
coupeboy said:
Mirror, signal, check, manouver.
By 'check' i assume you mean look over your right shoulder? If so i would change that order to

Mirror, check, signal, manouver.


ShadownINja

80,057 posts

311 months

Friday 20th August 2010
quotequote all
At least they signal. The issue is if they move without bothering to check.

henrycrun

2,473 posts

269 months

Friday 20th August 2010
quotequote all
On a busy M/way or DC one invaribly has to 'ask'. The driver following may flash you to proceed or move to lane 3.
Then change lane only if it is safe to do so

OlberJ

14,101 posts

262 months

Saturday 21st August 2010
quotequote all
Hedders said:
coupeboy said:
Mirror, signal, check, manouver.
By 'check' i assume you mean look over your right shoulder? If so i would change that order to

Mirror, check, signal, manouver.
Yep, this way, then you're signalling for the least amount of time you really need to be.

Fleckers

2,880 posts

230 months

Saturday 21st August 2010
quotequote all
SIGNAL ??

I thought it was a right of way light !!!!

bikemonster

1,188 posts

270 months

Saturday 21st August 2010
quotequote all
I work on the basis that if somebody has to brake or swerve on account of my actions, then I have done something wrong.

Even in slow moving traffic, there is invariably a driver who is not driving in the boot of the car ahead of him (or her).

As others have said: mirrors (and check blind spot), signal, manoeuvre.

bazking69

8,620 posts

219 months

Saturday 21st August 2010
quotequote all
At least you are getting a signal, whether they look or not.

An increasing number of people don't even seem to bother to indicate full stop when changing lanes on a motorway these days...

PeteG

4,278 posts

240 months

Saturday 21st August 2010
quotequote all
Fleckers said:
SIGNAL ??

I thought it was a right of way light !!!!
nono Forcefield.

volumeone

321 posts

193 months

Saturday 21st August 2010
quotequote all
Glad we got that sorted.