Your Freedom - Influencing the law on motorway max speed
Discussion
I've posted a request, under David Cameron's initiative to allow the public to influence repeal and change of UK law in the interests of restoration of freedom, to review motorway speed limits, and either abolish them or increase the limit to 85 MPH.
Unsurprisingly, Brake and the other anti speed at any price lobbies have gone on the attack!
It would be good to see some support for a very reasonable request, which is about the application of common sense in a technologically advanced World. If you feel that you can comment and/or vote on the matter, have a look at:
http://yourfreedom.hmg.gov.uk/repealing-unnecessar...
Many thanks
Unsurprisingly, Brake and the other anti speed at any price lobbies have gone on the attack!
It would be good to see some support for a very reasonable request, which is about the application of common sense in a technologically advanced World. If you feel that you can comment and/or vote on the matter, have a look at:
http://yourfreedom.hmg.gov.uk/repealing-unnecessar...
Many thanks
I think it might have been wiser to ask for an 130kph limit, to bring us in line with much of Europe. Many of the further restrictions that various mentalists would seek to impose upon us come from Europe, (such as the lower DD limits, but without the lower punishments of course). 130kph could have been converted into an 80 with-a-tad-to-spare limit, and would allow those of us who desire so to cruise at a nice indicated 85. Also keeps us a bit further from the 90 mph 'enforcement measure', if that makes any sense.
I'm rather shocked by the claims in this document though http://www.pacts.org.uk/docs/pdf-bank/motorwayspee...
Are French autoroutes really 125% more dangerous than ours? I find that the difference in driving conditions between France and UK to be stark, the UK m'ways being so congested and populated by so many aggressive and selfish drivers, completely unlike France in my experience.
I've been trying to get my head around how France could have an autoroute casualty rate 125% greater than ours, and the only conclusion i can come up with is the the reason our m'way casualty rate is so low is because most of the time the traffic is crawling or stationary.
In which case the higher speed limit would make no difference.
I'm rather shocked by the claims in this document though http://www.pacts.org.uk/docs/pdf-bank/motorwayspee...
Are French autoroutes really 125% more dangerous than ours? I find that the difference in driving conditions between France and UK to be stark, the UK m'ways being so congested and populated by so many aggressive and selfish drivers, completely unlike France in my experience.
I've been trying to get my head around how France could have an autoroute casualty rate 125% greater than ours, and the only conclusion i can come up with is the the reason our m'way casualty rate is so low is because most of the time the traffic is crawling or stationary.
In which case the higher speed limit would make no difference.
Blimey, you got jumped on there by the antis... This request seems to have more sensible replies:
http://yourfreedom.hmg.gov.uk/repealing-unnecessar...
Will sign up.
http://yourfreedom.hmg.gov.uk/repealing-unnecessar...
Will sign up.
Gad-Westy said:
liner33 said:
Dunno about 85mph but I would be all for the same limits as France for example with a 130mph speed on motorways with 110kph in wet conditions or on DC's
I think you might have over estimated the French tolerance for high speed travel! 

Brilliant standard of driving too. One MLM all the way. Guess where that car came from? Yup....
heebeegeetee said:
I'm rather shocked by the claims in this document though http://www.pacts.org.uk/docs/pdf-bank/motorwayspee...
Some of the claims made in that document are directlycontradicted by
http://www.abd.org.uk/motorwayspeedlimit.htm
This document sounds, to me, a lot more plausible
than the pacts document.
grumbledoak said:
TonyRPH said:
This sounds like a sensible idea.
A law that we all break is a dumb law. It happens when our politicians have something to gain (i.e. money) by us breaking the law.clarkey328is said:
grumbledoak said:
TonyRPH said:
This sounds like a sensible idea.
A law that we all break is a dumb law. It happens when our politicians have something to gain (i.e. money) by us breaking the law.vonhosen said:
clarkey328is said:
grumbledoak said:
TonyRPH said:
This sounds like a sensible idea.
A law that we all break is a dumb law. It happens when our politicians have something to gain (i.e. money) by us breaking the law.Gassing Station | General Gassing [Archive] | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff



Sounds good and shall have a read.