Motorway congestion alleviation idea
Motorway congestion alleviation idea
Author
Discussion

hornetrider

Original Poster:

63,161 posts

234 months

Monday 6th September 2010
quotequote all
It seems to me that the majority of congestion on moderately busy motorways is caused by merging traffic.

This traffic on the slip is moving slightly slower than traffic on the motorway, resulting in existing traffic slowing, and creating a ripple effect back along the carriageway until eventually all traffic is grinding to a halt and merging at walking pace.

Would it not be a good idea to extend the slip for say, half a mile along the hard shoulder with clear signage for joining traffic to get up to speed and merge in turn?

There are merge signs in Oz and NZ and they seem to work pretty well.

I can't help thinking a simple change such as this could certainly alleviate or reduce congestion at peak times.

Deluded

4,968 posts

220 months

Monday 6th September 2010
quotequote all
I doubt there is a modern car out there that can't get to 70mph before the end of every slip road out there. I never had a problem in any of the 1.0l cars I've had over the years.

The problem isn't the road, it's the stupid drivers who try to merge going 20mph slower than the road they are merging into.

mat205125

17,790 posts

242 months

Monday 6th September 2010
quotequote all
On the continent, the transition between the inside lane and the outer lanes is prohibited by a solid white line. Merging does not effect the outer lanes.

Whether this would work on our un-policed motorway networks, where poor driving standards like middle lane hogging and tailgating go unchecked by automotons looking only for vehicles moving at 77mph or more to fine, is a different matter.

thinfourth2

32,414 posts

233 months

Monday 6th September 2010
quotequote all
hornetrider said:
Would it not be a good idea to extend the slip for say, half a mile along the hard shoulder with clear signage for joining traffic to get up to speed and merge in turn?
Would not work

There is a very very long slip road going onto the dual carriageway from my work and it is not uncommon to see someone going along the sliproad and have settled into cruise mode who have to suddenlly stop or swerve out of the sliplane as they are too damn thick to see it is a sliproad

louiebaby

10,955 posts

220 months

Monday 6th September 2010
quotequote all
The only problem with the inside lane exiting, and then coming back with the joining traffic, (effectively making a 3 lane motorway 2 lanes between the off and on ramp,) is that it would encourage more idiots to sit in the middle lane.

I think it would be better to use the hard shoulder to make longer on ramps, but this would not be useful for emergency services.

Maybe people could just learn to drive better. If there was a need to learn how to use a motorway as part of the driving test it would help...

deeen

6,403 posts

274 months

Monday 6th September 2010
quotequote all
I think we need a mechanical solution. Each slip road should end with a loop of tarmac to take the cars back to the start of the sliproad, and a speed-activated pivoting section of road (like the points on rail tracks).

Anyone doing less than, say, 60 mph would never make it on to the motorway.

NoNeed

15,137 posts

229 months

Monday 6th September 2010
quotequote all
/kenlivingstone mode on


why not charge people to use them, that'll cure it.



/kenlivingstone mode off

fathomfive

11,220 posts

219 months

Monday 6th September 2010
quotequote all
Can we not just shoot the aholes who think it's a good idea to drive at 50mph in a car on the motorway?

kambites

71,466 posts

250 months

Monday 6th September 2010
quotequote all
deeen said:
I think we need a mechanical solution. Each slip road should end with a loop of tarmac to take the cars back to the start of the sliproad, and a speed-activated pivoting section of road (like the points on rail tracks).

Anyone doing less than, say, 60 mph would never make it on to the motorway.
Bit harsh on lorries that are limited to 56mph. hehe

perdu

4,885 posts

228 months

Monday 6th September 2010
quotequote all
I understand it is illegal* to travel in the nearside lane in Germany to allow "leavers" and "joiners" room to get on and off within about 300 mtrs of the junction, that would make getting on and off safer here I think.

  • remembered from my Nato Driving tick test when I was in the TA years ago
Lane discipline was far better observed across the sea than here, German drivers seemed to move to lane 2 on autobahn junctions and then merge afterwards with the new boys slipping seamlessly between.

I wonder if it's still like that'cos this was over thirty years ago and the world seems to have become crappier ever since

deeen

6,403 posts

274 months

Monday 6th September 2010
quotequote all
hehe kambites

I'm torn between saying good, we solve 2 problems at once, or pointing out that many lorries achieve an "adjusted" 56, or accepting that on a 2 lane sliproad, the inside lane could be 55, and the outside lane 65.

Edited by deeen on Monday 6th September 13:43

renrut

1,478 posts

234 months

Monday 6th September 2010
quotequote all
I like that 60mph on/off system. We should extend it into a half baked idea idea

I propose we have a centrifugal 'on' slip road. Unless you are generating enough momentum you can't get on, like a shuttle attempting to leave orbit. Lorries would be ok as even though they are 56mph limited their extra mass should help (its not based on gravity in this instance but on a momentum limit).

This would then lock away the idiot drivers who can't comprehend the system and eventually the roads would be free of them. biggrin

In reality the problem is one of simple maths. If you have 1 lane running at full capacity (the on road) and 3 lanes running at capacity (the motorway), they all are trying to use 3 lanes of capacity. 1+3 does not equal 3. The only way to cope with this capacity issue is buffering (queues) to reduce the throughput to that of 3 lanes or alternatively ensuring that you never reach full capacity on any of the incoming lanes.

Petrolhead_Rich

4,659 posts

221 months

Monday 6th September 2010
quotequote all
kambites said:
deeen said:
I think we need a mechanical solution. Each slip road should end with a loop of tarmac to take the cars back to the start of the sliproad, and a speed-activated pivoting section of road (like the points on rail tracks).

Anyone doing less than, say, 60 mph would never make it on to the motorway.
Bit harsh on lorries that are limited to 56mph. hehe
In his defence he did exclude HGV's from his suggestion....

I think its a cracking idea, a loop of mindless idiots trying to get onto the motorway....

NorthernBoy

12,642 posts

286 months

Monday 6th September 2010
quotequote all
As I've mentioned on another thread today, I've really noticed a difference in the last ten or so years in how bad congestion is. It used to be that I could do the trip London to Newcastle at a fair pace as long as I did it outside of rush hour. Under four hours was pretty normal, and I did in in closer to three on a bike once through the night (300 miles, all motorway or fast dual carriageway), but now I need to budget five hours to be comfortable, and even that will mean putting my foot down a fair bit on the odd empty stretch.

It's bad enough that I rarely take the car on this trip now, preferring to either ride, fly, or take the train. I'd be happy to see all sorts of schemes to try to free the roads up a bit more, including raising speed limits, encouraging commercial vehicles to travel at night, or even road pricing.

When I'm sitting there at 60, for hour after hour, it makes me wonder if I should have a small, cheap car with good mileage to do the trip in, but that would take away one of the few justifications I still have for owning something fast.

Podie

46,649 posts

304 months

Monday 6th September 2010
quotequote all
A PHer did some work in his PhD thesis on this... when people don't change lanes, congestion is reduced.

edo

16,699 posts

294 months

Monday 6th September 2010
quotequote all
How about we don't give driving licences to fkwits who cant merge into flowing traffic at the right speed? That would help would it not?

mrmr96

13,736 posts

233 months

Monday 6th September 2010
quotequote all
thinfourth2 said:
hornetrider said:
Would it not be a good idea to extend the slip for say, half a mile along the hard shoulder with clear signage for joining traffic to get up to speed and merge in turn?
Would not work

There is a very very long slip road going onto the dual carriageway from my work and it is not uncommon to see someone going along the sliproad and have settled into cruise mode who have to suddenlly stop or swerve out of the sliplane as they are too damn thick to see it is a sliproad
Might work if you painted "move over" arrows in the sliplane. (They must be painted on the floor so that even the muppents who can barely see beyond their own bonnet will notice them, cos they don't notice signs on poles.)

Petrolhead_Rich

4,659 posts

221 months

Monday 6th September 2010
quotequote all
renrut said:
In reality the problem is one of simple maths. If you have 1 lane running at full capacity (the on road) and 3 lanes running at capacity (the motorway), they all are trying to use 3 lanes of capacity. 1+3 does not equal 3. The only way to cope with this capacity issue is buffering (queues) to reduce the throughput to that of 3 lanes or alternatively ensuring that you never reach full capacity on any of the incoming lanes.
in reality the 3 lanes are no where near their maximum capacity though are they???

the issue is slow car joins motorway, fast car/truck in lane 1 needs to move over to pass, faster car in lane 2 joins lane 3, thus LANE 3 ONLY reaches capacity due to the delay in lane 1 and the knock on in lane 2!

deeen

6,403 posts

274 months

Monday 6th September 2010
quotequote all
The Renrut centrifugal (centripetal???) method would be particularly exciting for motorbikes. wobble

mybrainhurts

90,809 posts

284 months

Monday 6th September 2010
quotequote all
Congestion would reduce if we stand the Middle Lane Cruisers in front of a wall and shoot them...