Suspension renewnal : Age , Mileage or the old bounce test ?
Suspension renewnal : Age , Mileage or the old bounce test ?
Author
Discussion

Stoatman

Original Poster:

592 posts

190 months

Wednesday 29th September 2010
quotequote all
My car is coming up to 120,000 miles and 10 years old. I just cant decide to start renewing suspension parts , specifically dampers. Due to me not having the car from new and the gradual nature of their wear I just dont know if they would feel much improved if replaced. My garage and the bounce test suggest they are "OK", but what is ok 50% as good as new , 80 % ? If it matters my car is a Honda civic aerodeck VTI. Sort of sporty but no ferrari. What are peoples views on this , i have heard manufacturers reccommending changing dampers at 40 or 60,000 miles. SO mine should have probably been changed twice by now but never have.


Thanks

Chris

bullitinhead

295 posts

192 months

Wednesday 29th September 2010
quotequote all
when I get a red sheet from the MOT man for them..... Is that bad??????? wink


bullit

Dr Doofenshmirtz

16,604 posts

223 months

Wednesday 29th September 2010
quotequote all
To be honest, if they aren't leaking they're probably fine.
My Celica's suspension is original and done 18 years/180'000 miles service - the car still feels at tight as a Nuns fa...erm, yeah. It still feels fine.

Stoatman

Original Poster:

592 posts

190 months

Wednesday 29th September 2010
quotequote all
Ahh ok , I mean thats good from a cash point of view. But do you ever get that nagging feeling if it would handle better or not. Maybe its because my car is a little wallowy and I think thats just how it is anyway. Although I had my rear bushes done and it made a big difference to stability and a creaky noise dissapeared at the rear. They were diagnosed as "OK" too , which they probably were but changing them did improve things.

cptsideways

13,820 posts

275 months

Wednesday 29th September 2010
quotequote all
It'll have Tokico shocks from the factory which will be as good new at 150k miles. As is the case for most Jap cars.

HellDiver

5,708 posts

205 months

Wednesday 29th September 2010
quotequote all
I'll be putting dampers in my Mondeo in January. It's a 54-plate with 62k on the clock. It felt OK until I drove another similar 54-plater that only had 35k on the clock. Mine's like driving a boat in comparison.

cpl_payne

576 posts

206 months

Wednesday 29th September 2010
quotequote all
Horses for courses - if it's just means for getting from A to B leave them alone until they leak. If (as I suspect) you're interested in getting more driving enjoyment - definitely change them, you will notice the difference.

RobM77

35,349 posts

257 months

Wednesday 29th September 2010
quotequote all
Two garages said that my old 325i was fine at 110,000 miles by driving it, bouncing it and even measuring it with fancy equipment, but I thought it was an absolute deathtrap. I got them to change the suspension and it absolutely transformed it. Driving is the onyl reliable way to check suspension in my modest experience. Most performance cars have noticeable damper wear at 30-40k miles, may need changing at 60-80k miles and definitely need changing at 100k miles. It varies according to the type of driving done and the roads the car is driven on though. For a daily driver, I'd shift things on a bit from those estimates.

angusc43

13,254 posts

231 months

Wednesday 29th September 2010
quotequote all
In my experience they are usually getting pretty worn at 50k and are shot by 75k.

This was certainly true of my C43's and 200 SX's.

The giveaways are big body movements when you hit undulations at speed, excessive roll, chatter under wheelspin, etc.

At 120k I'd deffo replace them - it would make a big difference

monthefish

20,467 posts

254 months

Wednesday 29th September 2010
quotequote all
HellDiver said:
I'll be putting dampers in my Mondeo in January. It's a 54-plate with 62k on the clock. It felt OK until I drove another similar 54-plater that only had 35k on the clock. Mine's like driving a boat in comparison.
This is a very good way to check (although can be tricky to arrange).

Stoatman

Original Poster:

592 posts

190 months

Wednesday 29th September 2010
quotequote all
Thanks for the replies , I suppose 50 quid for each rear and 60 quid for fronts (Bilstein) is not to big a gamble for improved ride and enjoyment. I think my car deserves it for loyal service and the mileage I have ploughed into it !

J4CKO

45,776 posts

223 months

Wednesday 29th September 2010
quotequote all
Ebay coilies FTW biggrin

Stoatman

Original Poster:

592 posts

190 months

Wednesday 29th September 2010
quotequote all
Ha , Ha . Hmm, well I have seen people put them on but I really want to keep it standard and not lower it and I value my teeth, my cars underbelly and dont want to look ridiculous !.

Stoatman

Original Poster:

592 posts

190 months

Saturday 13th November 2010
quotequote all
Well big update , I am sure people were on the edge of their seats !. ALthough I suppose it may be of interest with those of us with older cars.

Changed all 4 dampers , definately helped the ride you can really tell its reacting quicker and feeling the road. As I went standard they were not too expensive , if I paid out a couple of grand on a set up for a more expensive car you could say I would be a little disapointed but I am pretty pleased with the value for money aspect.

I changed the rear trailing arm bushes a few months ago and strangely enough they seemed to improve the ride more than the 4 dampers. I have also added a rear anti-roll bar as the estate version of my car did not come with one (but had all the fixing points available, so it was easy).