OH's boss's poor poor form
OH's boss's poor poor form
Author
Discussion

balders118

Original Poster:

5,940 posts

197 months

Wednesday 6th October 2010
quotequote all
So my OH got a puncture in the work van (shes a vet nurse) on the way back from transporting from one branch to another. I say puncture, the tyre blew out. She couldn't find the wheel nut wrench so called the RAC. When the RAC got there they said the tyre was in dreadful condition and was very illegal. He also said the brake pads were nakered and literally at the end of there useful life.

My OH informed her boss of this when she eventually got back to work. Her response was that it will be fine, and doesn't need looking at and will get sorted in the MOT in January! But its worse than that, when she overheard another nurse talking about it and saying it needed doing she has gone out of her way to ensure that it doesn't get done. She expects her employee's to drive an unsafe van 30 miles everyday in order to skimp on a few quid sorting tyres and brakes!

What a fkwit. Total and utter gammonslipper.

[/rant]

Edit: i'm aware of the grammatical mistook in the title. Apologies.

Edited by balders118 on Wednesday 6th October 19:20

PHmember

2,487 posts

200 months

Wednesday 6th October 2010
quotequote all
fk that, who do you think will get the fine & points for driving an unroadworthy vehicle - it won't be the boss in the office.

thinfourth2

32,414 posts

233 months

Wednesday 6th October 2010
quotequote all
Wait till bosses uses van

call cops

3 months later get pulled over

end up with points on your license

say bugger

ludicrous speed

959 posts

223 months

Wednesday 6th October 2010
quotequote all
Just get everyone to refuse to use the van until it's sorted.

steveo3002

11,201 posts

203 months

Wednesday 6th October 2010
quotequote all
cant help on the brakes...but im sure you could figure a way to have the sidewalls punctured one day so it gets new tyres

*Al*

3,830 posts

251 months

Wednesday 6th October 2010
quotequote all
It is the drivers responsibility to check that the vehicle is roadworthy and legal to use, in court ignorance will be no defence.

Motorrad

6,811 posts

216 months

Wednesday 6th October 2010
quotequote all
Report it anonomously to whoever is superior to the Boss and state copies of the complaint are being sent to the Police.

twazzock

1,930 posts

198 months

Wednesday 6th October 2010
quotequote all
st on the bonnet every morning until it's sorted.


Sorted.

Flintstone

8,644 posts

276 months

Wednesday 6th October 2010
quotequote all
balders118 said:
Edit: i'm aware of the grammatical mistook in the title. Apologies.
Just the title?


biglaugh

balders118

Original Poster:

5,940 posts

197 months

Wednesday 6th October 2010
quotequote all
*Al* said:
It is the drivers responsibility to check that the vehicle is roadworthy and legal to use, in court ignorance will be no defence.
Oh dear, always someone thats has to blame the OP. Fair point, but its the fact it was pointed out and the bosses reaction to it thats the issue.

Asterix

24,438 posts

257 months

Wednesday 6th October 2010
quotequote all
Refuse to drive would seem to be the right thing to do - however, can they sack her for not doing xxx of her job - just make sure HR know, everything is in writing etc...

balders118

Original Poster:

5,940 posts

197 months

Wednesday 6th October 2010
quotequote all
Asterix said:
Refuse to drive would seem to be the right thing to do - however, can they sack her for not doing xxx of her job - just make sure HR know, everything is in writing etc...
HR - small company to this is the boss/owner and everything. I think she has spoken to her direct boss (head nurse) who is going to have strong words tomorrow.

*Al*

3,830 posts

251 months

Wednesday 6th October 2010
quotequote all
balders118 said:
*Al* said:
It is the drivers responsibility to check that the vehicle is roadworthy and legal to use, in court ignorance will be no defence.
Oh dear, always someone thats has to blame the OP. Fair point, but its the fact it was pointed out and the bosses reaction to it thats the issue.
Ok fair point about the bosses reaction, the answer is you (or rather your spouse) refuses to drive it, it is your/her legal obligation.

Patrick Bateman

13,151 posts

203 months

Wednesday 6th October 2010
quotequote all
Absolutely refuse to drive, she's in the right, not just morally but legally.

Daniel1

2,931 posts

227 months

Wednesday 6th October 2010
quotequote all
im sure that if something terrible would happen corporate manslaughter would be an issue. I'd refuse to drive it. And if sacked then wrongful dismissal. Fight your corner, politely at first though.

balders118

Original Poster:

5,940 posts

197 months

Wednesday 6th October 2010
quotequote all
Daniel1 said:
im sure that if something terrible would happen corporate manslaughter would be an issue. I'd refuse to drive it. And if sacked then wrongful dismissal. Fight your corner, politely at first though.
Everyone agress with the OH, including the head nurse. So it should get sorted soon as there will be an uprisal if it doesn't by the sound of it.

zeppelin101

724 posts

221 months

Wednesday 6th October 2010
quotequote all
Get the others checked while you're at it.

I'm sure there is an agency somewhere that would have a field day if your employer is trying to force you to drive vehicles that clearly aren't safe.

balders118

Original Poster:

5,940 posts

197 months

Wednesday 6th October 2010
quotequote all
Just to add, the boss also let the MOT run out and waited 4 months to get renewed. This was last year I believe.

EDIT: None of the staff were made aware of this until after

Edited by balders118 on Wednesday 6th October 19:58

LuS1fer

43,494 posts

274 months

Wednesday 6th October 2010
quotequote all
She should refuse.
If you knowingly drive a vehicle in an obviously dangerous condition, it can amount to dangerous driving.