BL/AR/Rover Group - Where did it all go wrong?
BL/AR/Rover Group - Where did it all go wrong?
Author
Discussion

LHD

Original Poster:

17,002 posts

216 months

Friday 8th October 2010
quotequote all
I've been giving this some thought after reading this:

http://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&a...

I drove past Longbridge a couple of weeks ago and there is virtually nothing left.

It's quite a sad sight.

The question is: Why did it all go wrong?

It's easy to point the finger at the unrest in the 70's but how can a company that produced the Mini, Range Rover and SD1 produce utter dross like the Marina and Allegro.

Was it the cars, the management or changing consumer tastes?

I have my theory but i'd like to hear yours.

slipstream 1985

13,754 posts

208 months

Friday 8th October 2010
quotequote all
unions.


MG CHRIS

9,322 posts

196 months

Friday 8th October 2010
quotequote all
There was another thread on this only the other month not another one please

Edited by MG CHRIS on Friday 8th October 20:34

LHD

Original Poster:

17,002 posts

216 months

Friday 8th October 2010
quotequote all
MG CHRIS said:
There was another thread on this only the other month not another one please

Edited by MG CHRIS on Friday 8th October 20:34
Was there?

Anyway, it's nice to hear opinions...

Six Fiend

6,067 posts

244 months

Friday 8th October 2010
quotequote all
I watched Carry On At Your Convenience last weekend. That pretty much covered it smile

MG CHRIS

9,322 posts

196 months

Friday 8th October 2010
quotequote all

skeggysteve

5,724 posts

246 months

Friday 8th October 2010
quotequote all
I remember reading that Sir Alec Issigonis, a few years after finishing the Mini, designed a hatchback version but he management refused to produce it.
His hatchback design was years before they became the norm.
Just another example of how we, the British, have great ideas and let everyone else make money out of them.

minimatt1967

17,381 posts

235 months

Friday 8th October 2010
quotequote all
I think its biggest problem was it spent the 50's, 60's and 70's trying to compete with itself, rather than properly take the fight to Ford, Vauxhall et al.

300bhp/ton

41,030 posts

219 months

Friday 8th October 2010
quotequote all
LHD said:
I've been giving this some thought after reading this:

http://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&a...

I drove past Longbridge a couple of weeks ago and there is virtually nothing left.

It's quite a sad sight.

The question is: Why did it all go wrong?

It's easy to point the finger at the unrest in the 70's but how can a company that produced the Mini, Range Rover and SD1 produce utter dross like the Marina and Allegro.

Was it the cars, the management or changing consumer tastes?

I have my theory but i'd like to hear yours.
I think in essence you answer your own question. The Allegro and Marina were never really dross - just bashed and perceived as such as we Brits beat ourselves up.

At any point in time any of the cars where as good or better than the competition (maybe bar the last year or two, but even that is arguable).

In short there is no single reason, just a compound of issues. But how we the public and the media attacked them continually is a non quantifiable large scale contributor. For proof, just look at the Montego SOTW thread, see how many people post comments like POS yet it's evident they are speaking with little or no experience.

No other marque on PH receives such hatred and miss information. And in nearly all the cases unfounded and totally made up BS.

HTH smile

LHD

Original Poster:

17,002 posts

216 months

Friday 8th October 2010
quotequote all
300bhp/ton said:
LHD said:
I've been giving this some thought after reading this:

http://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&a...

I drove past Longbridge a couple of weeks ago and there is virtually nothing left.

It's quite a sad sight.

The question is: Why did it all go wrong?

It's easy to point the finger at the unrest in the 70's but how can a company that produced the Mini, Range Rover and SD1 produce utter dross like the Marina and Allegro.

Was it the cars, the management or changing consumer tastes?

I have my theory but i'd like to hear yours.
I think in essence you answer your own question. The Allegro and Marina were never really dross - just bashed and perceived as such as we Brits beat ourselves up.

At any point in time any of the cars where as good or better than the competition (maybe bar the last year or two, but even that is arguable).

In short there is no single reason, just a compound of issues. But how we the public and the media attacked them continually is a non quantifiable large scale contributor. For proof, just look at the Montego SOTW thread, see how many people post comments like POS yet it's evident they are speaking with little or no experience.

No other marque on PH receives such hatred and miss information. And in nearly all the cases unfounded and totally made up BS.

HTH smile
I just wanted to prompt debate.

bazking69

8,620 posts

219 months

Friday 8th October 2010
quotequote all
A whole multitude of sins, including poor build quality for decades, bad company management, products at least 5 years behind the competition and riding on the reputation of a once great band with substandard products.

The best products they ever produced were ripped from Honda or BMW.

calibrax

4,788 posts

240 months

Friday 8th October 2010
quotequote all
bazking69 said:
The best products they ever produced were ripped from Honda or BMW.
And just what did they rip from BMW?

bazking69

8,620 posts

219 months

Friday 8th October 2010
quotequote all
calibrax said:
bazking69 said:
The best products they ever produced were ripped from Honda or BMW.
And just what did they rip from BMW?
The 75/ZT platform.

minimatt1967

17,381 posts

235 months

Friday 8th October 2010
quotequote all
calibrax said:
bazking69 said:
The best products they ever produced were ripped from Honda or BMW.
And just what did they rip from BMW?
The Diesel engine (in the 75) and the majority of the 75 development, but BMW more than took their fare share in exchange.

davepoth

29,395 posts

228 months

Friday 8th October 2010
quotequote all
The problems were there before BL started. Bear in mind that BL was only amalgamated in 1968, and effectively shrank into Austin-Rover in 1981.

Leyland Motor Corporation, which was Triumph and Rover, as well as the commercial vehicles, was doing really well at that point. However, British Motor Holdings, which was Austin, Morris, MG, Jaguar, Riley et al was about bankrupt. There were no plans to replace the at that point 20 year old Morris Minor, the eight year old Austin 1100, the Mini, or any of the other larger 10 year old saloons.

All of the recently introduced cars were a bit rubbish (Maxi, Austin 1800, Austin 3 Litre. All of which had the same doors, but that's another story). It was impossible to imagine the 2/3rds of the British car industry could go to the wall, so BMH was merged with LMC to make BLMC.

The problem was that the Merger of Austin and the Nuffield Organisation back in 1962 to create BMC, which became BMH had been botched. Austin and Morris were direct competitors, but in the 6 years since merger, there had been no effort whatsoever to reduce the competition between the two divisions, and they were effectively still being run as separate companies. That meant that there were effectively two cars in each market sector, which did nothing for profitability. That was even before one started to look at all of the cars which were being made at a loss.

So what was done in the 13 years after the creation of BL was incredible given what they had to work with. The Marina went from a clean sheet of paper to production in under 3 years, and was a huge seller for the company.

300bhp/ton

41,030 posts

219 months

Friday 8th October 2010
quotequote all
bazking69 said:
A whole multitude of sins, including poor build quality for decades, bad company management, products at least 5 years behind the competition and riding on the reputation of a once great band with substandard products.

The best products they ever produced were ripped from Honda or BMW.
Just a shame that everything you've said there is pretty much wrong though.

minimatt1967

17,381 posts

235 months

Friday 8th October 2010
quotequote all
davepoth said:


So what was done in the 13 years after the creation of BL was incredible given what they had to work with. The Marina went from a clean sheet of paper to production in under 3 years, and was a huge seller for the company.
I agree they were up against it, but the Marina, clean sheet of paper really?
Lever arm damper, like a Morris Minor?
Leaf Springs at the back?
Some had drum brakes on the front..
A/B series power plants which were hardly cutting edge?


bazking69

8,620 posts

219 months

Friday 8th October 2010
quotequote all
300bhp/ton said:
bazking69 said:
A whole multitude of sins, including poor build quality for decades, bad company management, products at least 5 years behind the competition and riding on the reputation of a once great band with substandard products.

The best products they ever produced were ripped from Honda or BMW.
Just a shame that everything you've said there is pretty much wrong though.
Ok dokey. Must all be mere hearsay I've read in The Sun down the years.

Anyways this is an age old argument that everyone, including me, has had their say on on numerous occasions now. No need to rake it up yet again. You certainly won't change my opinion.

Edited by bazking69 on Friday 8th October 22:05

henrycrun

2,473 posts

269 months

Friday 8th October 2010
quotequote all
Does anyone know why Rover were not bought by Honda, instead of BMW ?

RWD cossie wil

4,382 posts

202 months

Friday 8th October 2010
quotequote all
Awful build quality, even worse designs, crap image to anyone under 60, utterly terrible reliability, and worst of all disgraceful management..... I worked briefly for Rover, the attitude was that it was cheaper to fix warranty claims than improve the design & manufacture failings spoke volumes of the companys aspirations. They assumed that "being British" would be enough of a selling point for survival.

It didn't...