Vehicle registration dates
Vehicle registration dates
Author
Discussion

DieselGriff

Original Poster:

5,160 posts

288 months

Saturday 9th October 2010
quotequote all
Fairly simple question really, I'm hoping the answer will be equally simple.

If you have a car of a certain age, what has to remain of the car for it to keep it's age?

175gt

337 posts

192 months

Saturday 9th October 2010
quotequote all
Seems like a fairly difficult question to me - I have no idea what you meanconfused

pinchmeimdreamin

10,892 posts

247 months

Saturday 9th October 2010
quotequote all
DieselGriff said:
Fairly simple question really, I'm hoping the answer will be equally simple.

If you have a car of a certain age, what has to remain of the car for it to keep it's age?
I guess you are planning to alter the car quite radically somehow?

anonymous-user

83 months

Saturday 9th October 2010
quotequote all
175gt said:
Seems like a fairly difficult question to me - I have no idea what you meanconfused
Im guessing he means, if you pull a car out of the bottom of a lake or a rusted classic and you want to restore it, what needs to be left of the original car to keep its reg/age and authenticity

DieselGriff

Original Poster:

5,160 posts

288 months

Saturday 9th October 2010
quotequote all
yammyfan said:
175gt said:
Seems like a fairly difficult question to me - I have no idea what you meanconfused
Im guessing he means, if you pull a car out of the bottom of a lake or a rusted classic and you want to restore it, what needs to be left of the original car to keep its reg/age and authenticity
That sort of thing yes, thanks.

I'm particularly interested in the cat\non cat requirement between 92 and 93 if that makes a difference.

DieselGriff

Original Poster:

5,160 posts

288 months

Saturday 9th October 2010
quotequote all
pinchmeimdreamin said:
DieselGriff said:
Fairly simple question really, I'm hoping the answer will be equally simple.

If you have a car of a certain age, what has to remain of the car for it to keep it's age?
I guess you are planning to alter the car quite radically somehow?
Not necessarily, another way of asking would be "If I wanted to restore a car how much of the original car would be required to still be that car" (as far as the law\DVLA are concerned)

That could mean the same thing, or I could just mean putting different seats in IYSWIM

Cost Captain

3,920 posts

209 months

Saturday 9th October 2010
quotequote all
Chassis

The identity of a car is defined by its chassis, hence the appeal of 'cut and shut' jobs, where by all the identifying marks on the chassis can be kept.

DieselGriff

Original Poster:

5,160 posts

288 months

Saturday 9th October 2010
quotequote all
Cost Captain said:
Chassis

The identity of a car is defined by its chassis, hence the appeal of 'cut and shut' jobs, where by all the identifying marks on the chassis can be kept.
Yeah, I sort of thought this might be the case, but what happens (as a TVR owner this could happen) when your chassis needs replacing? Is it okay as long as you can show your chassis number?

Cheers

Hugo a Gogo

23,437 posts

262 months

Saturday 9th October 2010
quotequote all
http://www.direct.gov.uk/en/Motoring/BuyingAndSell...


"Vehicles that have been rebuilt using a mix of new or used parts

In order to retain the original registration mark:

* cars and car-derived vans must use:

The original unmodified chassis or unaltered bodyshell (i.e. body and chassis as one unit - monocoque); or a new chassis or monocoque bodyshell of the same specification as the original supported by evidence from the dealer or manufacturer (e.g. receipt).

And two other major components from the original vehicle - ie suspension (front & back); steering assembly; axles (both); transmission or engine.

If a second-hand chassis or monocoque bodyshell is used a car must pass an Individual Vehicle Approval (IVA) and light goods vans must have a enhanced single vehicle approval (ESVA) or single vehicle approval (SVA) test after which a ""Q"" prefix registration number will be allocated.

* motorcycles must use:

Unmodified frame (original or new) and two other major components from the original vehicle; forks, wheels and engine or gear box.

If a second-hand frame is used the vehicle must pass a motorcycle single vehicle approval (MSVA) test after which a 'Q' prefix registration number will be allocated."

Cost Captain

3,920 posts

209 months

Saturday 9th October 2010
quotequote all
Hugo a Gogo said:
http://www.direct.gov.uk/en/Motoring/BuyingAndSell...


"Vehicles that have been rebuilt using a mix of new or used parts

In order to retain the original registration mark:

* cars and car-derived vans must use:

The original unmodified chassis or unaltered bodyshell (i.e. body and chassis as one unit - monocoque); or a new chassis or monocoque bodyshell of the same specification as the original supported by evidence from the dealer or manufacturer (e.g. receipt).

And two other major components from the original vehicle - ie suspension (front & back); steering assembly; axles (both); transmission or engine.

If a second-hand chassis or monocoque bodyshell is used a car must pass an Individual Vehicle Approval (IVA) and light goods vans must have a enhanced single vehicle approval (ESVA) or single vehicle approval (SVA) test after which a ""Q"" prefix registration number will be allocated.

* motorcycles must use:

Unmodified frame (original or new) and two other major components from the original vehicle; forks, wheels and engine or gear box.

If a second-hand frame is used the vehicle must pass a motorcycle single vehicle approval (MSVA) test after which a 'Q' prefix registration number will be allocated."
Bingo! on the majority of cars if a new chassis is required the car would be a write off, or you would reshell the car and use the registration off the donor vehicle!

ladygooddriver

184 posts

192 months

Saturday 9th October 2010
quotequote all
At risk of being shot for immoral behaviour, it is no more than a matter of what goes on behind closed doors. If you have the paperwork and VIN plate and a vehicle that fits the identity of both, who is to say it is not what you claim it to be?

With regard to cats there is no requirement in law that a vehicle has to have them fitted just because they were fitted originally. All that is required is that if they are fitted they must meet their legal requirement both for MOT and construction and use etc. It is not against the law to remove them also.



Lady

Cost Captain

3,920 posts

209 months

Saturday 9th October 2010
quotequote all
ladygooddriver said:
At risk of being shot for immoral behaviour, it is no more than a matter of what goes on behind closed doors. If you have the paperwork and VIN plate and a vehicle that fits the identity of both, who is to say it is not what you claim it to be?

With regard to cats there is no requirement in law that a vehicle has to have them fitted just because they were fitted originally. All that is required is that if they are fitted they must meet their legal requirement both for MOT and construction and use etc. It is not against the law to remove them also.



Lady
well, no. If you get pulled over in a car that is subject to the 93 and onwards emissions laws, you can have emissions tested with a gas analyser, and if the emissions are too high, you're in trouble.

Just because its unlikely to be checked outside of an MOT test doesn't mean you only need it for an MOT test

ladygooddriver

184 posts

192 months

Saturday 9th October 2010
quotequote all
So you can't read then?

There is no legal requirement to have cats fitted - end of. There is a requirement for a vehicle to meet emission standards, which is not the same thing.


Lady

DieselGriff

Original Poster:

5,160 posts

288 months

Saturday 9th October 2010
quotequote all
Thanks for the responses, I'm certainly not going to argue with any of them but I'm intrigued by the question of chassis.

It seems a bit like granddad's spade (where the head and handle were replaced several times) it's still granddad's original spade.

It appears that if I had a 02 Griff' and had to replace the chassis then the car would become a 2010 car and have to meet other current legislation, or have I read it wrong?

ETA: Sorry I was being lazy - Body shell or Chassis, and I assume that if you replace one with a certificate and then an another, with certificate, then all is okay?

Edited by DieselGriff on Saturday 9th October 21:41

Ozzie Osmond

21,189 posts

275 months

Saturday 9th October 2010
quotequote all
DieselGriff said:
It seems a bit like granddad's spade (where the head and handle were replaced several times) it's still granddad's original spade.
Maybe, but don't forget that all-important VIN.

Lots of valuable old racing cars have been crashed over the years only to re-emrge after rebuild as two "genuine" versions of the same car. Something like on with the chassis and one with the engine...