Kumho tyres???
Discussion
I unfortunately need 4 new tyres for the Volvo V70.
I'm on the cusp of clicking "buy" on these tyres
KUMHO KU31 ECSTA SPORT
225/45R17 94Y XL

Price is a huge consideration as a). I'm a bit skint and b).The car is also having a BIG service next week.
I can get the 4 Kuhmos delivered for £243 quid.
Any thoughts on this particular tyre, or any alternatives??
I'm on the cusp of clicking "buy" on these tyres
KUMHO KU31 ECSTA SPORT
225/45R17 94Y XL

Price is a huge consideration as a). I'm a bit skint and b).The car is also having a BIG service next week.
I can get the 4 Kuhmos delivered for £243 quid.
Any thoughts on this particular tyre, or any alternatives??
Edited by dave_s13 on Tuesday 16th November 11:24
I rate them.
Run them on the M3 and the 355.
I did an airfield day in the 355 not long after I bought them and I could get slightly more cornering speed out of them than my previous Bridgestone RE050's. They seem to be wearing reasonably as well.
They do tend to tramline a little.
Others to consider would be the Falken 452's, which also get good reviews.
Run them on the M3 and the 355.
I did an airfield day in the 355 not long after I bought them and I could get slightly more cornering speed out of them than my previous Bridgestone RE050's. They seem to be wearing reasonably as well.
They do tend to tramline a little.
Others to consider would be the Falken 452's, which also get good reviews.
HellDiver said:
A quick Google would have revealed that they're one of the better mid-range tyres.
Did that but posting on here gets more of an unbiased opinion.And I might also get slagged off for only spending £243 on the only thing that keeps my car on the road and not sliding into a bus stop full of small children, if I'm lucky

Cactussed said:
iAlex said:
I went from these to 452's and both were fairly decent. 452's would definitely be my recommendation of the two.
Reason being?Kumhos wore well and lasted a decent amount of time but the 452's seem to be wearing well too.
It all comes down to confidence, especially in the wet but both are definitely pretty decent mid-range tyres.
oldcynic said:
Cactussed said:
You can read my thoughts in the Tyre Wiki on here.
Sorry - I'm new here. Where is the tyre wiki?Edited by dave_s13 on Tuesday 16th November 12:27
dave_s13 said:
Thanks. Now bookmarked.If you are not too bothered about grip levels , they are ok . They wear well but wet weather grip with them on my 5 series is very poor compared with contisports .In fact very ,very poor . Read the very recent report in one of the car mags( can't remember which one as I read too many ) where they were rated very poorly .
That said I only got 6500 mls out of the previous contisport fronts before they feathered like 50p pieces - 12000mls on the Kumhos and they are fine. Rears are wornout thou at roughly the same mileage .
That said I only got 6500 mls out of the previous contisport fronts before they feathered like 50p pieces - 12000mls on the Kumhos and they are fine. Rears are wornout thou at roughly the same mileage .
Gassing Station | General Gassing [Archive] | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff


