E46 m3's
Author
Discussion

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

76 months

Sunday 28th November 2010
quotequote all
Blimey, they dont hold their value very well do they. There is a 2002 model, with reasonable mileage for sale on this very website for less than £11k. Is that average for this model of car?? I would have thought they would be a lot more than that

useyourdellusion

5,648 posts

212 months

Sunday 28th November 2010
quotequote all
That's about the going rate really, and I for one am not complaining! I'm seriously considering one next year. smile

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

76 months

Sunday 28th November 2010
quotequote all
Me neither, at that price i'm seriously considering one next year. Whats the downside other than expensive servicing and parts?

Ruskie

4,360 posts

222 months

Sunday 28th November 2010
quotequote all
snowy slopes said:
Me neither, at that price i'm seriously considering one next year. Whats the downside other than expensive servicing and parts?
On my list as well. From my research if you get a good one with good history and lots of stuff done recently brakes, tyres inspection 1 etc then they are reasonable to run. However if you get a bad one or simply unlucky they can empty your pockets rapidly.

useyourdellusion

5,648 posts

212 months

Sunday 28th November 2010
quotequote all
Servicing is every 2 years or 15000 miles (whichever comes first). I'd budget for about a £1k on average each time it goes in for one.

I've heard the suspension is usually pretty shagged by the 60000 mile mark, so budget for that also. Rear springs are prone to snapping too.

I'm no expert mind, someone will probably be along soon to correct me..

Edited by useyourdellusion on Sunday 28th November 11:46

Gizmo!

18,150 posts

231 months

Sunday 28th November 2010
quotequote all
They can be had much cheaper than that too. You may wish to steer clear of the cheapest ones though.

If you really want a shock though, go and look at the prices of E39 M5s.

Teocali

238 posts

209 months

Sunday 28th November 2010
quotequote all
Gizmo! said:
They can be had much cheaper than that too. You may wish to steer clear of the cheapest ones though.

If you really want a shock though, go and look at the prices of E39 M5s.


Tax, MOT 95k with FSH for £6,600.

I really wish you hadn't pointed that out..... smile

sagt550

236 posts

210 months

Sunday 28th November 2010
quotequote all
Isn't it M3s, not M3's ? biggrin

Windymiller

1,937 posts

262 months

Sunday 28th November 2010
quotequote all
As with all precious metal that plummets in purchase-cost, the running costs generally remain as was...

—inspection II is about £500 indy, £700 BMW
—rear tyres from about £400 for decent ones
—front discs and pads from about £400

From what I recall (sold mine over a year ago) oil wasn't too cheap either. I suffered from a snapped spring too. Oh, and my SMG box wasn't the best... after only 20,000 miles it would somehow 'miss' 3rd to 4th, generally when I was on the limiter during a track day... CRUNCH!!! yikes

Not good. They go sideways for fun though biggrin

With the prices being as they are currently I've been considering swapping my E36 track-car for one, but they're still pretty costly to get to a decent track-spec IMHO.

martin mrt

3,878 posts

223 months

Sunday 28th November 2010
quotequote all
I had one in 08, low mileage (37k when bought) 2 owner car with FBMWSH

Anything that went wrong it was never cheap, bottom arms, power steering rack, RTABs, brakes, and servicing, that little lot cost me the guts of 5k in a year, so I got rid before it bankrupted me.

They are cheap now, but after owning one I'm not sure I'd have another, potential money pits

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

76 months

Sunday 28th November 2010
quotequote all
sagt550 said:
Isn't it M3s, not M3's ? biggrin
It probably is yes, i shall go hand my head in shame now. Oh, and i really wish he hadnt said that about m5s(is that okay?;)) too

Edited by snowy slopes on Sunday 28th November 12:28

g3org3y

22,025 posts

213 months

Sunday 28th November 2010
quotequote all
snowy slopes said:
sagt550 said:
Isn't it M3s, not M3's ? biggrin
It probably is yes, i shall go hand my head in shame now. Oh, and i really wish he hadnt said that about m5s(is that okay?;)) too

Edited by snowy slopes on Sunday 28th November 12:28
No, you need to do it properly: ///M5 tongue out

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

76 months

Sunday 28th November 2010
quotequote all
g3org3y said:
snowy slopes said:
sagt550 said:
Isn't it M3s, not M3's ? biggrin
It probably is yes, i shall go hand my head in shame now. Oh, and i really wish he hadnt said that about m5s(is that okay?;)) too

Edited by snowy slopes on Sunday 28th November 12:28
No, you need to do it properly: ///M5 tongue out
rolleyesAnother day i cant get it right. fk me at this rate i will be having detention from garlick and co for about the next 10 years.


On a slightly different note, and a bit OT, i once made the mistake of trying to run a ur-quattro on a budget. Dont. Its impossible, especially if its an older one, as parts are horrendously expensive. One example. The rear calipers are on an arm that attaches to the rear half shafts, or cross members, i cant remember which, but pattern ones at the time(1993) were £400, and genuine audi ones were nearly double that. So for those of us drooling over cheap m3s and m5s, then bear in mind the potential pitfalls.

Still would have either one though