More Kitty Litter?

More Kitty Litter?

Author
Discussion

toppstuff

Original Poster:

13,698 posts

249 months

Monday 18th November 2013
quotequote all
It seems that the run-off areas are so wide these days that mistakes are rarely punished.

And yet, there is no apparent improvement in overtaking because of the extra room.

Punting the car into the kitty litter and getting stuck was a regular co-incidence in the past, but that all seems to have gone now. And the racing does not seem any better.

Would racing be better if there was more risk involved in going off-line, or would it make things worse?

Muzzer79

10,309 posts

189 months

Monday 18th November 2013
quotequote all
Didn't they get rid of much of the kitty litter due to the risk of hitting hit side on and the car subsequently digging in and flipping over?

Eric Mc

122,344 posts

267 months

Monday 18th November 2013
quotequote all
Go back beyond the kitty litter era and look at what happened to drivers who went "off line".

RDMcG

19,280 posts

209 months

Monday 18th November 2013
quotequote all
We need to wrap every car in huge inflatable bags, turn down the speeds, put in rubber walls, fully enclose the drivers, and eliminate that pesky noise pollution.

AFC1886

3,372 posts

152 months

Monday 18th November 2013
quotequote all
Completely agree there should be more gravel traps.

Alot of drivers seem to take the piss regarding track boundaries. It would punish silly mistakes and poor driving. The best example of late was Perez driving like a berk in Suzuka a couple of years ago. Overcooked his braking and got punished by beaching it in the gravel.
Proper old skool circuit though, none of these bland Tilke airfield's.

RGambo

851 posts

171 months

Monday 18th November 2013
quotequote all
I drove silverstone GP this year in my caterham. Ok so it's a LOT slower than f1, but man, you'd have to make a special effort to reach the tyre barrier! You really can just drive as hard as you want, if you get a corner wrong, say copse, then you just correct and drive off the track, over an area that's like a small car park and rejoin.

anonymous-user

56 months

Monday 18th November 2013
quotequote all
Gaz. said:
AFC1886 said:
Proper old skool circuit though, none of these bland Tilke airfield's.
Spa has significant tarmac run offs now.

There is only one good reason to use gravel, and plenty of bad ones. Abu Dhabi & Paul Ricard use abrasive strips which knacker your tyres & your race, but they don't have cars and bikes cart wheeling either.
I think you're right but the principle of punishing a driver who goes off, as with abrasive areas, surely could be more widely used and developed?

StevieBee

13,040 posts

257 months

Monday 18th November 2013
quotequote all
REALIST123 said:
Gaz. said:
AFC1886 said:
Proper old skool circuit though, none of these bland Tilke airfield's.
Spa has significant tarmac run offs now.

There is only one good reason to use gravel, and plenty of bad ones. Abu Dhabi & Paul Ricard use abrasive strips which knacker your tyres & your race, but they don't have cars and bikes cart wheeling either.
I think you're right but the principle of punishing a driver who goes off, as with abrasive areas, surely could be more widely used and developed?
A bed of spikes might do the trick…though I can see the MotoGP boys complaining a bit!

RB Will

9,685 posts

242 months

Wednesday 20th November 2013
quotequote all
How about something like track - kerb - shallow gravel- tarmac runoff.

So the gravel is there to keep everyone on line and is a real punishment that could lead to spins/ punctures/ time loss but only being an inch or so deep is unlikely to lead to rollovers.

or maybe eliminate the gravel altogether and have a 5 ft wide strip of skid pan grade tarmac then onto grippy stuff to slow you down

Chrisgr31

13,545 posts

257 months

Wednesday 20th November 2013
quotequote all
Isn't the answer to have a penalty for going outside the track limits? or if you do there is a specific point you have to rejoin at which has the affect of making you lose time on that lap?

andygo

6,850 posts

257 months

Wednesday 20th November 2013
quotequote all
Chrisgr31 said:
Isn't the answer to have a penalty for going outside the track limits? or if you do there is a specific point you have to rejoin at which has the affect of making you lose time on that lap?
What about the system they use at Bedford Autodrome. The single seaters seem to have transponders that when triggered by an off track excursion cuts the engine until you rejoin. I realise that cutting the engine power suddenly can be a bad thing, but the trigger could for instance cut engine power by 150 bhp for 10 seconds after the car rejoins.

That would learn them.

G0ldfysh

3,305 posts

259 months

Wednesday 20th November 2013
quotequote all
andygo said:
What about the system they use at Bedford Autodrome. The single seaters seem to have transponders that when triggered by an off track excursion cuts the engine until you rejoin. I realise that cutting the engine power suddenly can be a bad thing, but the trigger could for instance cut engine power by 150 bhp for 10 seconds after the car rejoins.

That would learn them.
More and more like a computer game, cutting corners on either Forza or Gran Turismo does something like this.

andygo

6,850 posts

257 months

Wednesday 20th November 2013
quotequote all
G0ldfysh said:
More and more like a computer game, cutting corners on either Forza or Gran Turismo does something like this.
I see your point, but on the other hand it penalises an off roader in an instant way and is actually a no more artificial 'enhancement' than DRS and Kers.

woof

8,456 posts

279 months

Wednesday 20th November 2013
quotequote all

Safe runs off aren't a bad thing at all.
Not penalising a driver for using the run off, when they are gaining an advantage is the problem.

Here in the UK all the club racers are up in arms about the new MSA ruling about going outside the white lines that mark the track limits. All UK tracks have a continuis white line that marks the end of the tarmac. Kerbs and run offs live outside these white lines.

The existing rules allow you to run "2 wheels off" these white lines and usage of the kerbs. Certain tracks - Brands Hatch for example have various run off areas after the kerb and white lines. Paddock Hill and Graham Hill being the most used. You can get a considerable advantage for running all 4 wheels off in those areas and currently you can do that X times before getting a warning/penalty.

The new rules (and they are terrible written and no one really understands them) basically say you can't run any wheel outside the white lines and in some instances that even includes the kerbs. At Brands that's going to cost you maybe 4 secs !

That's the other extreme to keeping drivers on the black stuff. The MSA ruling is something Jonathan Palmer has forced in, simply because he doesn't want to keep paying for a bit of grass seed and filling in grooves where we run off consistently.


designndrive62

746 posts

159 months

Wednesday 20th November 2013
quotequote all
woof said:
Safe runs off aren't a bad thing at all.
Not penalising a driver for using the run off, when they are gaining an advantage is the problem.

Here in the UK all the club racers are up in arms about the new MSA ruling about going outside the white lines that mark the track limits. All UK tracks have a continuis white line that marks the end of the tarmac. Kerbs and run offs live outside these white lines.

The existing rules allow you to run "2 wheels off" these white lines and usage of the kerbs. Certain tracks - Brands Hatch for example have various run off areas after the kerb and white lines. Paddock Hill and Graham Hill being the most used. You can get a considerable advantage for running all 4 wheels off in those areas and currently you can do that X times before getting a warning/penalty.

The new rules (and they are terrible written and no one really understands them) basically say you can't run any wheel outside the white lines and in some instances that even includes the kerbs. At Brands that's going to cost you maybe 4 secs !

That's the other extreme to keeping drivers on the black stuff. The MSA ruling is something Jonathan Palmer has forced in, simply because he doesn't want to keep paying for a bit of grass seed and filling in grooves where we run off consistently.
And it will be enforced rigorously in every form of motor racing in the uk except the following:

Btcc, f3, british gt, hehe and some drivers in their support races that can get away with murder whilst others seemingly get penalised just for turning up!

zac510

5,546 posts

208 months

Saturday 23rd November 2013
quotequote all
Often when a car hits a gravel trap in its direction of travel then the car just won't slow down, there's no traction so the car can't stop.
In that situation tarmac run-off would be better as the car's brakes could be used to slow the car down.

I guess they have done the sums on it and by probability it is more safe to slow the car down itself before it hits the wall than to have it skate across kitty litter and hit the wall.

majordad

3,604 posts

199 months

Sunday 24th November 2013
quotequote all
And it will be enforced rigorously in every form of motor racing in the uk except the following:

Btcc, f3, british gt, hehe and some drivers in their support races that can get away with murder whilst others seemingly get penalised just for turning up!



Is this a joke or true ?

anonymous-user

56 months

Sunday 24th November 2013
quotequote all
Just look at Interlagos this weekend.

Off camber runoff area past the kerb and grass at the side of the road before hitting the tarmac seems to be doing the trick.

LaurasOtherHalf

21,429 posts

198 months

Monday 25th November 2013
quotequote all
woof said:
.

The new rules (and they are terrible written and no one really understands them) basically say you can't run any wheel outside the white lines and in some instances that even includes the kerbs. At Brands that's going to cost you maybe 4 secs !

That's the other extreme to keeping drivers on the black stuff. The MSA ruling is something Jonathan Palmer has forced in, simply because he doesn't want to keep paying for a bit of grass seed and filling in grooves where we run off consistently.
Correction, at brands that's going to cost everyone who obeys the rules 4 seconds, & those that don't a penalty.