0-200km/h in 4.4sec
0-200km/h in 4.4sec
Author
Discussion

neil1jnr

Original Poster:

1,485 posts

177 months

Tuesday 19th November 2019
quotequote all
I was watching the Brazilian GP the other day and saw the stat come on the screen telling you the fastest start of the race.

It was Leclerc and his Ferrari; 0-200km/h (125mph) in 4.4seconds. I know the current F1 cars are quick, but that is seruiously quick!


Kent Border Kenny

2,219 posts

82 months

Tuesday 19th November 2019
quotequote all
Especially considering that that’s not really what they are designed to do best.

ATM

20,793 posts

241 months

Tuesday 19th November 2019
quotequote all
Many years ago - like 15 to 20 - I'm sure they said the F1 of that era did 80 mph in 1st gear in about 2 seconds. Then with the aero of that era once over around 100 mph - guessing again - they could drive upside down as produced more down force than weight of the car.

LHRFlightman

2,184 posts

192 months

Tuesday 19th November 2019
quotequote all
neil1jnr said:
I was watching the Brazilian GP the other day and saw the stat come on the screen telling you the fastest start of the race.

It was Leclerc and his Ferrari; 0-200km/h (125mph) in 4.4seconds. I know the current F1 cars are quick, but that is seruiously quick!

Uphill as well. wink

TheDeuce

30,852 posts

88 months

Tuesday 19th November 2019
quotequote all
ATM said:
Many years ago - like 15 to 20 - I'm sure they said the F1 of that era did 80 mph in 1st gear in about 2 seconds. Then with the aero of that era once over around 100 mph - guessing again - they could drive upside down as produced more down force than weight of the car.
If we weren't in an aero era then they could probably still do 80 in 2 seconds now. Hard to compare the tyres from different era's too. As it is it's more like 60-65 in the first two seconds. But a lot more happens in the following 2 seconds once the car is settled into the track.

F1 cars, for decades have been theoretically able to drive upside down. And in theory pretty safely too. At 150+ the downforce is about 1500kg Vs it's 700kg weight. In other words, whilst upside down in the tunnel, it's being pushed up against the tunnel roof with as much force as it has when stationary on the ground.

Getting them up to 150mph and flipping them on to the roof of a tunnel is the tricky bit - and getting them back down again in one piece biggrin

fido

18,327 posts

277 months

Thursday 21st November 2019
quotequote all
TheDeuce said:
If we weren't in an aero era then they could probably still do 80 in 2 seconds now. Hard to compare the tyres from different era's too. As it is it's more like 60-65 in the first two seconds. But a lot more happens in the following 2 seconds once the car is settled into the track.
Yep, mostly lost of traction at lower speeds. If an F1 car could put down ALL the power it would hit 120 in around 2 seconds.

thegreenhell

21,460 posts

241 months

Thursday 21st November 2019
quotequote all
TheDeuce said:
Getting them up to 150mph and flipping them on to the roof of a tunnel is the tricky bit - and getting them back down again in one piece biggrin
Getting the oil in the engine to go where you want it to when it's upside down is fun too. They'd need an oil system similar to an old piston aero engine.

ATM

20,793 posts

241 months

Thursday 21st November 2019
quotequote all
thegreenhell said:
TheDeuce said:
Getting them up to 150mph and flipping them on to the roof of a tunnel is the tricky bit - and getting them back down again in one piece biggrin
Getting the oil in the engine to go where you want it to when it's upside down is fun too. They'd need an oil system similar to an old piston aero engine.
I'm going to disagree with this. Surely based on the forces these cars experience the oil system can cope whichever way is up or down.

anonymous-user

76 months

Thursday 21st November 2019
quotequote all
ATM said:
I'm going to disagree with this. Surely based on the forces these cars experience the oil system can cope whichever way is up or down.
Not so sure. I'd expect they're designed for lateral forces but not for vertical inversion.

TheDeuce

30,852 posts

88 months

Thursday 21st November 2019
quotequote all
janesmith1950 said:
ATM said:
I'm going to disagree with this. Surely based on the forces these cars experience the oil system can cope whichever way is up or down.
Not so sure. I'd expect they're designed for lateral forces but not for vertical inversion.
This is correct. Aeronautical engines use positive pressure as opposed to gravity. Even in gravity systems there is still 'pressure' but it's not a fully closed system, their is air still - and once inverted the air would find the wrong places and displace the oil.

That said, oil is viscous stuff and the current system would probably see the engine through a few hundred metres of tunnel until the car was the right way up again. The turbo would be the big concern but that would probably survive what would in reality be a few seconds for the sake of such a publicity stunt.

Cold

16,359 posts

112 months

Friday 22nd November 2019
quotequote all
I saw a documentary about three Minis that went upside down in an Italian tunnel. If they can do it then surely this is possible for an F1 team.

ATM

20,793 posts

241 months

Friday 22nd November 2019
quotequote all
Ok I was wrong. Just did a quick Google and best comparison I could come up with was 4 stroke engines on aircraft. These all use dry sump systems - that's obvious - but they do need tweaking to support inversion.

TheDeuce

30,852 posts

88 months

Friday 22nd November 2019
quotequote all
ATM said:
Ok I was wrong. Just did a quick Google and best comparison I could come up with was 4 stroke engines on aircraft. These all use dry sump systems - that's obvious - but they do need tweaking to support inversion.
With any such engine I'd expect there is a limit to how long it can run inverted for though - although with modifications I guess it's not rocket science to ensure the fluids flow as required no matter what.

When Richard Hammond for old TG drove the defender up a vertical dam face they had to move the engine into the back and have it pivot so it remained the right way up. I'm guessing the length of his ascent was longer than the engine could have coped with at such an angle. If it was inverted for ten seconds though... Most engines would probably survive that.

A super high tuned F1 engine however, maybe much more sensitive. Whatever though, if any team decided to perform such a stunt I'm sure they'd have the resources to engineer around any such problems for the sake of a smooth run.

Edited by TheDeuce on Friday 22 November 08:40

Mark-C

7,139 posts

227 months

Friday 22nd November 2019
quotequote all
Don't Radial engines always have smething upside down?


TheDeuce

30,852 posts

88 months

Friday 22nd November 2019
quotequote all
Mark-C said:
Don't Radial engines always have smething upside down?

Yes, and as such they're designed differently for different applications. Many used in aircraft were air cooled, which is much easier with the radial layout. Those that are oil cooled tend to use a lot of it.

Not really much use when talking about an F1 car driving upside though.

geeks

10,984 posts

161 months

Friday 22nd November 2019
quotequote all
TheDeuce said:
janesmith1950 said:
ATM said:
I'm going to disagree with this. Surely based on the forces these cars experience the oil system can cope whichever way is up or down.
Not so sure. I'd expect they're designed for lateral forces but not for vertical inversion.
This is correct. Aeronautical engines use positive pressure as opposed to gravity. Even in gravity systems there is still 'pressure' but it's not a fully closed system, their is air still - and once inverted the air would find the wrong places and displace the oil.

That said, oil is viscous stuff and the current system would probably see the engine through a few hundred metres of tunnel until the car was the right way up again. The turbo would be the big concern but that would probably survive what would in reality be a few seconds for the sake of such a publicity stunt.
https://driver61.com/qa/f1-car-really-drive-upside/

Mark-C

7,139 posts

227 months

Friday 22nd November 2019
quotequote all
TheDeuce said:
Not really much use when talking about an F1 car driving upside though.
I wasn't actually suggesting they use them biggrin

TheDeuce

30,852 posts

88 months

Friday 22nd November 2019
quotequote all
geeks said:
TheDeuce said:
janesmith1950 said:
ATM said:
I'm going to disagree with this. Surely based on the forces these cars experience the oil system can cope whichever way is up or down.
Not so sure. I'd expect they're designed for lateral forces but not for vertical inversion.
This is correct. Aeronautical engines use positive pressure as opposed to gravity. Even in gravity systems there is still 'pressure' but it's not a fully closed system, their is air still - and once inverted the air would find the wrong places and displace the oil.

That said, oil is viscous stuff and the current system would probably see the engine through a few hundred metres of tunnel until the car was the right way up again. The turbo would be the big concern but that would probably survive what would in reality be a few seconds for the sake of such a publicity stunt.
https://driver61.com/qa/f1-car-really-drive-upside/
Wow, they've given it some pretty serious thought then!

Kinda confirms in theory it's all relatively do-able, and that oil flow is the thing they'd need to get a bit clever about. The point I hadn't considered is who would drive it, given that no current F1 driver would be allowed to. Hulkenberg...? smile

Alonso! People are always speculating he'll come back in some capacity - this gets my vote.

Edited by TheDeuce on Friday 22 November 14:18

geeks

10,984 posts

161 months

Friday 22nd November 2019
quotequote all
TheDeuce said:
geeks said:
TheDeuce said:
janesmith1950 said:
ATM said:
I'm going to disagree with this. Surely based on the forces these cars experience the oil system can cope whichever way is up or down.
Not so sure. I'd expect they're designed for lateral forces but not for vertical inversion.
This is correct. Aeronautical engines use positive pressure as opposed to gravity. Even in gravity systems there is still 'pressure' but it's not a fully closed system, their is air still - and once inverted the air would find the wrong places and displace the oil.

That said, oil is viscous stuff and the current system would probably see the engine through a few hundred metres of tunnel until the car was the right way up again. The turbo would be the big concern but that would probably survive what would in reality be a few seconds for the sake of such a publicity stunt.
https://driver61.com/qa/f1-car-really-drive-upside/
Wow, they've given it some pretty serious thought then!

Kinda confirms in theory it's all relatively do-able, and that oil flow is the thing they'd need to get a bit clever about. The point I hadn't considered is who would drive it, given that no current F1 driver would be allowed to. Hulkenberg...? smile

Alonso! People are always speculating he'll come back in some capacity - this gets my vote.

Edited by TheDeuce on Friday 22 November 14:18
I always had this thing that if anyone did it then it would be Red Bull (its very their style), and if it were Red Bull then it would end up being DC which gives good upside down jokes, Webber would be a good fit too lol.

TheDeuce

30,852 posts

88 months

Friday 22nd November 2019
quotequote all
I suppose... It wouldn't have to be an official F1 team that performed the stunt. There are plenty slightly older cars that still have enough down force to make this possible. Perhaps such a spectacle could be crowd funded? I'l sling someone £50 if they could convince me they had a plan to actually do this. Christ knows it's been discussed enough over the years.

I also agree, Red Bull attachment on some level would be the natural choice. If a campaign hit it's targets and it looked like they really going to get it done, I imagine RB would be open to taking it over and probably providing a suitably modified car. They might not have any intention of doing it right now... But if someone else was about to do it anyway, they might suddenly get quite interested smile

I work fairly often with the guys behind these:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9yatAJVA_4E

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y64JhPtpicA

Now these two are ticked off the list, it probably is about time to drive along the roof of a tunnel wink