Has someone broken the cost cap in 2024?
Has someone broken the cost cap in 2024?
Author
Discussion

Megaflow

Original Poster:

10,593 posts

243 months

Thursday
quotequote all
Am interesting piece by The Race:

https://www.the-race.com/formula-1/fia-cost-cap-de...

It had passed me by that the FIA hadn’t announced the compliance results yet and these are now very late, has someone been at the catering budget again?

scratchchin


KernowSid

295 posts

165 months

Thursday
quotequote all
I think Aston have just announced it was them.

acer12

1,337 posts

192 months

Yesterday (08:58)
quotequote all
KernowSid said:
I think Aston have just announced it was them.
they should be let away with it as its probably related to Stroll's crashes

jimmsy

735 posts

145 months

Yesterday (09:21)
quotequote all
Two teams didn't fully comply with the cost cap.

Aston Martin was a procedural issue, so they didn't overspend.

Someone else (who hasn't even been rumoured in the paddock), overspent - I believe the wording was a serious breach or something like that.

Lots of fans saying maybe Williams as Toto mentioned they were close to the cap and then had a lot of crashes at the end of the season.

When it was Red Bull it was rumoured in the paddock immediately, the fact it hasn't been makes me believe it's likely not them this time.

snotrag

15,293 posts

229 months

Yesterday (09:35)
quotequote all
I really hope its not Williams. Alpine, or Haas, I couldnt give two hoots about. Sorry!

Megaflow

Original Poster:

10,593 posts

243 months

Yesterday (09:47)
quotequote all
KernowSid said:
I think Aston have just announced it was them.
I have just read that article this morning, that does genuinely appear to be a procedural issue.

Looks like another team is involved though. Given that Ross Brawn said when the rules were announced that is you break them you will lose your championship and the the first team to break them, Red Bull, did not, it will be interesting to see what happens if it is not McLaren for the WCC or Red Bull with the WDC.

kambites

70,102 posts

239 months

Yesterday (10:04)
quotequote all
Megaflow said:
Looks like another team is involved though. Given that Ross Brawn said when the rules were announced that is you break them you will lose your championship and the the first team to break them, Red Bull, did not, it will be interesting to see what happens if it is not McLaren for the WCC or Red Bull with the WDC.
Whoever it was, I guess they will have to stick with the precedence they set with Redbull the first time round; a reduced allowances for the year after next (so in this case 2026) but no impact to the season in which the transgression occurred.

TikTak

2,469 posts

37 months

Yesterday (10:21)
quotequote all
Not totally surprised, had a big whiff of inevitability in the first few seasons. The Aston thing seems reasonable enough though tbh.

Sure there will be some bandwagons updated and jumped on as more news comes out.

jimmsy

735 posts

145 months

Yesterday (10:59)
quotequote all
kambites said:
Whoever it was, I guess they will have to stick with the precedence they set with Redbull the first time round; a reduced allowances for the year after next (so in this case 2026) but no impact to the season in which the transgression occurred.
I believe the magnitude of the overspend dictates which set of punishments they choose from. Red Bulls £400k was inside the lower cap, so more lenient, a bigger overspend (I can't remember the exact number) would result in sporting penalties, i.e impact results.

kambites

70,102 posts

239 months

Yesterday (11:30)
quotequote all
jimmsy said:
kambites said:
Whoever it was, I guess they will have to stick with the precedence they set with Redbull the first time round; a reduced allowances for the year after next (so in this case 2026) but no impact to the season in which the transgression occurred.
I believe the magnitude of the overspend dictates which set of punishments they choose from. Red Bulls £400k was inside the lower cap, so more lenient, a bigger overspend (I can't remember the exact number) would result in sporting penalties, i.e impact results.
Ah I didn't realise such a scaled system was codified into the rules. i thought it was just a question of "material breach" or "procedural breach".

jimmsy

735 posts

145 months

Yesterday (11:37)
quotequote all
The Race said:
The scale of punishments for a cost cap breach depend exactly on what the offence is.

If it is a procedural breach such as a late submission, or failing to respond to requests for information then a team will be given a financial penalty only.

If it is for late and then non-submission of cost cap documents entirely, then a team can have constructors championship points deducted.

If there is a minor overspend breach, which counts as less than 5% over the cost cap limit, then a team may impose a financial penalty and/or minor sporting penalties.

The FIA classifies minor sporting penalties as a public reprimand, deduction of constructors or drivers championship points, suspension from races, limitation on aero or other testing or a reduction of future cost cap.

If there is a material breach, which is busting the cost cap by more than 5%, then a team will be docked constructors championship points, plus it may also get a financial penalty and a material sporting penalty.

The FIA rulebooks list the same punishment options as for a minor breach, but it does include the possibility of exclusion from the world championship.
https://www.the-race.com/formula-1/fia-cost-cap-de...

I've bolded the interesting bit...

HocusPocus

1,656 posts

119 months

Yesterday (12:01)
quotequote all
We would all hear the laughter ringing out in Chateau Spice if it were MB smile

FoolsErrand

38 posts

22 months

Yesterday (12:04)
quotequote all
kambites said:
I guess they will have to stick with the precedence they set with Redbull the first time round
Much though I'd like that to be true, if there's one thing I feel confident about it's that precedent means absolutely nothing in F1.

Megaflow

Original Poster:

10,593 posts

243 months

Yesterday (12:09)
quotequote all
jimmsy said:
The Race said:
The scale of punishments for a cost cap breach depend exactly on what the offence is.

If it is a procedural breach such as a late submission, or failing to respond to requests for information then a team will be given a financial penalty only.

If it is for late and then non-submission of cost cap documents entirely, then a team can have constructors championship points deducted.

If there is a minor overspend breach, which counts as less than 5% over the cost cap limit, then a team may impose a financial penalty and/or minor sporting penalties.

The FIA classifies minor sporting penalties as a public reprimand, deduction of constructors or drivers championship points, suspension from races, limitation on aero or other testing or a reduction of future cost cap.

If there is a material breach, which is busting the cost cap by more than 5%, then a team will be docked constructors championship points, plus it may also get a financial penalty and a material sporting penalty.

The FIA rulebooks list the same punishment options as for a minor breach, but it does include the possibility of exclusion from the world championship.
https://www.the-race.com/formula-1/fia-cost-cap-de...

I've bolded the interesting bit...
Which we all know won't happen for the championship winner because FIA have already set the precedent.

PhilAsia

6,498 posts

93 months

Yesterday (16:54)
quotequote all
Megaflow said:
jimmsy said:
The Race said:
The scale of punishments for a cost cap breach depend exactly on what the offence is.

If it is a procedural breach such as a late submission, or failing to respond to requests for information then a team will be given a financial penalty only.

If it is for late and then non-submission of cost cap documents entirely, then a team can have constructors championship points deducted.

If there is a minor overspend breach, which counts as less than 5% over the cost cap limit, then a team may impose a financial penalty and/or minor sporting penalties.

The FIA classifies minor sporting penalties as a public reprimand, deduction of constructors or drivers championship points, suspension from races, limitation on aero or other testing or a reduction of future cost cap.

If there is a material breach, which is busting the cost cap by more than 5%, then a team will be docked constructors championship points, plus it may also get a financial penalty and a material sporting penalty.

The FIA rulebooks list the same punishment options as for a minor breach, but it does include the possibility of exclusion from the world championship.
https://www.the-race.com/formula-1/fia-cost-cap-de...

I've bolded the interesting bit...
Which we all know won't happen for the championship winner because FIA have already set the precedent.
I cannot believe the FIA would choose to assist a team like that. Which team would that be?

zb

3,546 posts

182 months

Yesterday (17:56)
quotequote all
Megaflow said:
I have just read that article this morning, that does genuinely appear to be a procedural issue.

Looks like another team is involved though. Given that Ross Brawn said when the rules were announced that is you break them you will lose your championship and the the first team to break them, Red Bull, did not, it will be interesting to see what happens if it is not McLaren for the WCC or Red Bull with the WDC.
Rumour it is McLaren? scratchchin

Hustle_

25,781 posts

178 months

Yesterday (18:25)
quotequote all
Aston had a procedural breach first time around didn't they? Becoming a habit.