Spare wheel vs MPG
Author
Discussion

Pooky67

Original Poster:

577 posts

188 months

Sunday 8th May 2011
quotequote all
Will removing the spare wheel and tool kit make any significant improvement on fuel economy over a year? The car is a Mk1 Cupra R and the spare is a full sized alloy. It is covered by breakdown assistance anyway and I'd probably carry a can of tyre repair foam stuff as well.

But is it worth it having to wait for a tow over a simple puncture?

thinfourth2

32,414 posts

233 months

Sunday 8th May 2011
quotequote all
If you spend your entire day accelerating and braking then you will get a small saving

if you spend your entire day at a constant speed your car will be slightly higher leading to slightly more drag meaning slightly more costs.


However assuming it will take at least 2 hours of your time for a puncture to be fixed by roadside rescue i wouldn't even think about it.

Fatboy

8,268 posts

301 months

Sunday 8th May 2011
quotequote all
What does your car weigh? 1200kg odd?
What does the spare weigh? 15 kg odd?

Therefore you'll be reducing the weight by about 1%, not going to have much effect really (IMO)...

balls-out

3,794 posts

260 months

Sunday 8th May 2011
quotequote all
You will get far more effect from:
turning off aircon
windows always shut (drag)
checking tyre pressures
and MAINLY smooth (and slow) driving

Pooky67

Original Poster:

577 posts

188 months

Sunday 8th May 2011
quotequote all
Thought as much! Thanks for the advice! The spare stays smile

Kiltox

14,864 posts

187 months

Sunday 8th May 2011
quotequote all
Also - make sure it IS actually covered - some breakdown policies insist you have a spare with you and will not do anything if you don't.

Chrisw666

22,655 posts

228 months

Sunday 8th May 2011
quotequote all
You would be better off having a big st.

Kiltox

14,864 posts

187 months

Sunday 8th May 2011
quotequote all
Chrisw666 said:
You would be better off having a big st.
rofl

Jacobyte

4,768 posts

271 months

Sunday 8th May 2011
quotequote all
Combined with other techniques it could be a winner - you know: folding rear seats flat, cadence clutching, etc...

Kiltox

14,864 posts

187 months

Sunday 8th May 2011
quotequote all
Jacobyte said:
Combined with other techniques it could be a winner - you know: folding rear seats flat, cadence clutching, etc...
Hmm.... how much MPG will I gain if I remove my rear seats altogether and turn my Picanto into a (very small) van ? hehe

HonestIago

1,719 posts

215 months

Sunday 8th May 2011
quotequote all
Just go on a diet! I've dropped about 20lbs since January and I swear my wee car feels faster! laugh

james_gt3rs

4,816 posts

220 months

Sunday 8th May 2011
quotequote all
Jacobyte said:
Combined with other techniques it could be a winner - you know: folding rear seats flat, cadence clutching, etc...
I believe that Cadence clutching is a performance related technique, it's not intended to increase economy. HTH biggrin

Jacobyte

4,768 posts

271 months

Sunday 8th May 2011
quotequote all
james_gt3rs said:
I believe that Cadence clutching is a performance related technique, it's not intended to increase economy. HTH biggrin
So if it improves both performance and economy, does that make it better than a Mazda 335d (mapped)?

Superhoop

4,913 posts

222 months

Sunday 8th May 2011
quotequote all
Jacobyte said:
So if it improves both performance and economy, does that make it better than a Mazda 335d (mapped)?
It might if Mazda made the 335D and not BMW

vdubbin

2,175 posts

226 months

Sunday 8th May 2011
quotequote all
Superhoop said:
Jacobyte said:
So if it improves both performance and economy, does that make it better than a Mazda 335d (mapped)?
It might if Mazda made the 335D and not BMW
:whooshparrot:

McSam

6,753 posts

204 months

Sunday 8th May 2011
quotequote all
Chrisw666 said:
You would be better off having a big st.
A severely, medical-history-makingly massive st biggrin