Transverse engine and RWD
Discussion
I can't think of any. There doesn't seem any reason to do that, so I wouldn't be surprised if there are no examples, unless the US companies did one. They seem more inclined to be adventurous with their layouts.
Or some military or commercial vehicle where for some reason the propshaft had to go down one side of the chassis instead of down the middle
Or some military or commercial vehicle where for some reason the propshaft had to go down one side of the chassis instead of down the middle

I can't see any advantage or reason for it so the answer has got to be no. Thats assuming you mean a normal car, rather than some obscure vehicle.
The nearest thing I can think of is a BEC track car with the engine beside the driver (it was a one off iirc). Thats really a mid engine though.
The nearest thing I can think of is a BEC track car with the engine beside the driver (it was a one off iirc). Thats really a mid engine though.
98elise said:
I can't see any advantage or reason for it so the answer has got to be no. Thats assuming you mean a normal car, rather than some obscure vehicle.
The nearest thing I can think of is a BEC track car with the engine beside the driver (it was a one off iirc). Thats really a mid engine though.
That's a point. I wonder if any old racing cars from the front engined age did that so that the propshaft could run beside the driver instead of under him, thus allowing the driver to be sat lower? I still can't think of anyThe nearest thing I can think of is a BEC track car with the engine beside the driver (it was a one off iirc). Thats really a mid engine though.
I'm assuming the OP made the mistake of missing out "front mounted transverse engine" and RWD only. Then I'd say no except maybe in some crazy concept cars.
It just doesn't make sense from an engineering point of view if you were making a new car as you have to change the direction of drive twice for no reason or benefit. Direction changes will cost power and economy so no one would really want to do it.
You'll probably only gain a few inches of space once manifolds are accounted for on a 4 pot.
It just doesn't make sense from an engineering point of view if you were making a new car as you have to change the direction of drive twice for no reason or benefit. Direction changes will cost power and economy so no one would really want to do it.
You'll probably only gain a few inches of space once manifolds are accounted for on a 4 pot.
Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff



