Classic Mini Handling
Author
Discussion

left to right

Original Poster:

774 posts

206 months

Wednesday 1st June 2011
quotequote all
Me and My Dad have just bought a Classic Mini for a fun car. He had one as a first car and said the great fun around the twisty bit.
Does this still hold true today with modern cars? Or were they good at the time?

left to right

Original Poster:

774 posts

206 months

Wednesday 1st June 2011
quotequote all
Does a classic Mini handle well?

RobCrezz

7,892 posts

238 months

Wednesday 1st June 2011
quotequote all
I dont really understand the question. Are you asking if modern cars are fun to drive?

RobCrezz

7,892 posts

238 months

Wednesday 1st June 2011
quotequote all
left to right said:
Does a classic Mini handle well?
Yes.

kambites

71,483 posts

251 months

Wednesday 1st June 2011
quotequote all
Well since modern cars are almost universally less fun to drive than old ones, I'd say it's better than ever. [/controversial but true]

Robatr0n

12,362 posts

246 months

Wednesday 1st June 2011
quotequote all
left to right said:
Does a classic Mini handle well?
As you've just bought one, why don't you go and find out? confused

Yes they do handle well.

Synchromesh

2,428 posts

196 months

Wednesday 1st June 2011
quotequote all
left to right said:
Me and My Dad have just bought a Classic Mini for a fun car. He had one as a first car and said the great fun around the twisty bit.
Does this still hold true today with modern cars? Or were they good at the time?
How does nobody understand this? He's asking if they only had good handling compared to other cars of their era, or if they're handling is good even compared with today's cars.

I've only owned 2 cars. First a classic Mini, and now a Polo mk4 (02-09). I'd say that although the Polo has far more outright GRIP (both laterally and under acceleration/braking), the mini was infinitely more FUN on a twisty bit of road. As the tyres were only 145 section (versus 205 section on the Polo) you reached the limits of grip more quickly, but also more progressively. Don't get complacent though, it's SWB meant lift-off oversteer came rather suddenly. On top on that it's lack of power steering meant you could feel exactly what was going on, making it much more confidence inspiring near the limit, while it diminutive size opened up more options in terms of road positioning. On the other hand, Polos are hardly renowned for exciting handling, and comparing it to, say, a Renaultsport Clio, may have a different outcome.

left to right

Original Poster:

774 posts

206 months

Wednesday 1st June 2011
quotequote all
Synchromesh said:
How does nobody understand this? He's asking if they only had good handling compared to other cars of their era, or if they're handling is good even compared with today's cars.

I've only owned 2 cars. First a classic Mini, and now a Polo mk4 (02-09). I'd say that although the Polo has far more outright GRIP (both laterally and under acceleration/braking), the mini was infinitely more FUN on a twisty bit of road. As the tyres were only 145 section (versus 205 section on the Polo) you reached the limits of grip more quickly, but also more progressively. Don't get complacent though, it's SWB meant lift-off oversteer came rather suddenly. On top on that it's lack of power steering meant you could feel exactly what was going on, making it much more confidence inspiring near the limit, while it diminutive size opened up more options in terms of road positioning. On the other hand, Polos are hardly renowned for exciting handling, and comparing it to, say, a Renaultsport Clio, may have a different outcome.
Cheers thats the awnser I was after. I guess what confused them was the mini era was a good 40 years.

anonymous-user

84 months

Wednesday 1st June 2011
quotequote all
Go for a drive and come back and post a comment.
You'll enjoy it!

Synchromesh

2,428 posts

196 months

Wednesday 1st June 2011
quotequote all
left to right said:
Cheers thats the awnser I was after. I guess what confused them was the mini era was a good 40 50 years ago.
ETA



jammy_basturd

29,778 posts

242 months

Wednesday 1st June 2011
quotequote all
I've had and driven a number of cars, and a good few classic Minis (including a very sorted Mini from Bill Richards). Some modern cars can keep up with a classic mini through the twisties (although nearing the limit a lot will depend on the driver).

However, a modern car will always feel bigger, chunkier, slightly more clumsy. There aren't many modern cars that weigh in under a tonne! I think only an Elise or MK1 MX5 would come close to the responsiveness and lightweight feel of the Mini, but both of those are RWD, so slightly different in handling characteristics.

Stick 10x6 wheels on a Mini with Yoko A032Rs, KAD 4 pots and slightly uprated dampers and cones and it'll be the closest thing to go-kart handling you can get.

left to right

Original Poster:

774 posts

206 months

Wednesday 1st June 2011
quotequote all
I can't! fecking Insuranced. I am 19. My dad is going to be the main driver and I'll be a named driver. you try finding an insurance broker that will do that. it's alright if i am the main driver and my dad is named, but I won't be driving it the most so if we go down that way we will be fronting. I have tryed most of the specialist insurance brokers as well flux etc

kambites

71,483 posts

251 months

Wednesday 1st June 2011
quotequote all
left to right said:
I can't! fecking Insuranced. I am 19. My dad is going to be the main driver and I'll be a named driver. you try finding an insurance broker that will do that. it's alright if i am the main driver and my dad is named, but I won't be driving it the most so if we go down that way we will be fronting. I have tryed most of the specialist insurance brokers as well flux etc
Have you tried dedicated classic car insurers and/or the owners club(s)?

left to right

Original Poster:

774 posts

206 months

Wednesday 1st June 2011
quotequote all
doogz said:
No, it was the appaling English that threw me!
Sorry did my dyslexia offend you?

left to right

Original Poster:

774 posts

206 months

Wednesday 1st June 2011
quotequote all
kambites said:
Have you tried dedicated classic car insurers and/or the owners club(s)?
I sure have no luck yet.

anonymous-user

84 months

Wednesday 1st June 2011
quotequote all
left to right said:
doogz said:
No, it was the appaling English that threw me!
Sorry did my dyslexia offend you?
Dyslexia excuses annoy me. I'm classed as having it with numbers but truth be told I'm just st at maths. Don't like the dyslexia excuse. As John Bishop said, what happened to just being thick? And when maths is concerned I'm thick.

XitUp

7,690 posts

234 months

Wednesday 1st June 2011
quotequote all
Modern car will have more grip and be quicker.
Old mini will, imo have much more fun handling.

jammy_basturd said:
However, a modern car will always feel bigger, chunkier, slightly more clumsy. There aren't many modern cars that weigh in under a tonne! I think only an Elise or MK1 MX5 would come close to the responsiveness and lightweight feel of the Mini, but both of those are RWD, so slightly different in handling characteristics.
mk1 Ford Ka gets pretty close.

kambites

71,483 posts

251 months

Wednesday 1st June 2011
quotequote all
doogz said:
I thought dyslexia affected your ability to spell?
Dyslexia is an inability to spot and remember visual patterns, so the mind doesn't hold the "shape" of words properly. I suppose the same could hold with grammar as well?

left to right

Original Poster:

774 posts

206 months

Wednesday 1st June 2011
quotequote all
You know it's really hard for me to spell and use grammer correctly. I do try I reread every post I write 3 or 4 times. I'll tell you what I'll send you every post I'm about to send for you to spell check?

left to right

Original Poster:

774 posts

206 months

Wednesday 1st June 2011
quotequote all
doogz said:
I thought dyslexia affected your ability to spell? You seem to have spelt everything correct, it's just incomprehensible. Read it back. Would you have said it like that if you were talking? It makes no sense.

Never mind, i was just trying to figure out what you meant, but you seem to have got your answer.
I have to substitute words for others as I can't spell them and spell check can't even pick them up.