why do all the mags prefer the 458 to the mp4-12c
why do all the mags prefer the 458 to the mp4-12c
Author
Discussion

suffolk009

Original Poster:

7,862 posts

194 months

Thursday 16th June 2011
quotequote all
Just picked up a couple of magazines in Smiths, and I'm amazed at how they all prefer the 458 for subjective reasons.

Are there any magazines that have come down in favour of the lovely McLaren?

kambites

71,469 posts

250 months

Thursday 16th June 2011
quotequote all
I'd say there are two possibilities:

1) They think the Ferrari is the better car
2) They know Ferrari would refuse to ever give them another car to road test again if they picked the MP4.

I wouldn't like to comment on which is the truth...

mkopc

1,998 posts

231 months

Thursday 16th June 2011
quotequote all
Possibly because they've driven both wink

When(!) I'm in the market for either one of these two my money will be going straight to the Ferrari dealership.

jas xjr

11,309 posts

268 months

Thursday 16th June 2011
quotequote all
How many cars will mclaren launch in the future and how many will ferrari ?

ZeeTacoe

5,444 posts

251 months

Thursday 16th June 2011
quotequote all
Because the Ferrari is NA and we all know that is better.

davepoth

29,395 posts

228 months

Thursday 16th June 2011
quotequote all
In every respect of driving and practicality, the MP4-12c seems to win. It's quicker, lighter, more cleverly built and easier to live with.

But critically, it misses the theatricality needed from a supercar. McLaren have built a car that people who want to drive a fast car will want to buy. Unfortunately the person who buys a supercar generally uses it to drive around Knightsbridge at 3mph, and they are not really bothered about Nurburgring lap times.

The MP4-12c is a better car, the 458 is a better supercar.

Tallbut Buxomly

12,254 posts

245 months

Thursday 16th June 2011
quotequote all
They all rate the fezza over the macca because it has a ferrari badge. Stick a ferrari badge on the macca and they would all be raving about it being the best car in the universe ever.

fatboy69

9,424 posts

216 months

Thursday 16th June 2011
quotequote all
Much as i like the McLaren i have to say that if i had the money i would spend it on a 458.

Something to do with it not having turbo-chargers but having fist fulls of visual appeal, soul, passion, a wailing engine noise, heritage, etc etc etc.

These are things that (sadly) the McLaren lacks in comparison with the Ferrari.

I know that many people will dis-agree with the above & i only wish that i was wrong however i dont think that i am.

The one that would possibly sway me would be a drive in both cars - which isnt going to happen so i will have to base my opinion on what i know.

Dimski

2,100 posts

228 months

Thursday 16th June 2011
quotequote all
davepoth said:
In every respect of driving and practicality, the MP4-12c seems to win. It's quicker, lighter, more cleverly built and easier to live with.

But critically, it misses the theatricality needed from a supercar. McLaren have built a car that people who want to drive a fast car will want to buy. Unfortunately the person who buys a supercar generally uses it to drive around Knightsbridge at 3mph, and they are not really bothered about Nurburgring lap times.

The MP4-12c is a better car, the 458 is a better supercar.
If the typical owner isn't using it as a daily driver, does that make the Ferrari as the more entertaining vehicle the correct winner?

Or, if most owners spend all their time dawdling round Knightsbridge should the victor be the Mclaren because of its ride/ease to live with?

Maybe they should have just called this one a draw! hehe

Mr Dave

3,233 posts

224 months

Thursday 16th June 2011
quotequote all
Ive only been a passenger in a 400i for a good few miles and a 360 for a short trip and I have to say theres something in my head that being in a Ferrari makes it really special, same as in Lamborghinis and Aston Martins. I dont know if that would happen in the Mp4-12c.

Maybe people who have driven both actually prefer the 458? Could happen. It is a very very good car by all accounts.

EDLT

15,421 posts

235 months

Thursday 16th June 2011
quotequote all
davepoth said:
Unfortunately the person who buys a supercar generally uses it to drive around Knightsbridge at 3mph
Except the McLaren is supposed to be better at that, too. The only reason journalists choose the Ferrari is because it "has passion/soul/character/charisma" or some other flowery nonsense designed to keep them in all expenses paid trips to Italy in the future.

vladcjelli

3,370 posts

187 months

Thursday 16th June 2011
quotequote all
davepoth said:
In every respect of driving and practicality, the MP4-12c seems to win. It's quicker, lighter, more cleverly built and easier to live with.

But critically, it misses the theatricality needed from a supercar. McLaren have built a car that people who want to drive a fast car will want to buy. Unfortunately the person who buys a supercar generally uses it to drive around Knightsbridge at 3mph, and they are not really bothered about Nurburgring lap times.

The MP4-12c is a better car, the 458 is a better supercar.
Have to agree with this. I reckon the Mclaren would go round most things faster, but the Ferrari looks like it would eat it if it got peckish.

Mclaren have created a very competent car that looks like a lot of supercar wannabes that have come and gone in the last decade or two. The Ferrari looks like nothing else.











At this level I would imagine drama and image are more important to 95% of customers, rather than an incredibly capable fast car. Especially when most of them are as well.

davepoth

29,395 posts

228 months

Thursday 16th June 2011
quotequote all
EDLT said:
Except the McLaren is supposed to be better at that, too. The only reason journalists choose the Ferrari is because it "has passion/soul/character/charisma" or some other flowery nonsense designed to keep them in all expenses paid trips to Italy in the future.
No, not for commuting, but for being seen in; you've seen all of the pictures of supercars outside Harrods with UAE numberplates. The McLaren is, with the greatest will in the world, a bit geeky. The 458 has swagger, and that's what supercar buyers want.


Risotto

3,933 posts

241 months

Thursday 16th June 2011
quotequote all
From what I've read they're reasonably well matched in terms of performance, so I guess the decision as to which is more appealing does come down to factors like looks and vague ideas about feel and soul.

I do think Mclaren's plans for future models that will sit above the MP4-12C have lead to them being overly conservative with regard to the styling of the entry level model. I guess they wanted to keep some dramatic flourishes in reserve.

ZeeTacoe

5,444 posts

251 months

Thursday 16th June 2011
quotequote all
vladcjelli said:
What is that? It looks quite good.

suffolk009

Original Poster:

7,862 posts

194 months

Thursday 16th June 2011
quotequote all
I know it's subjective, but I just don't agree with (almost) everyone about the looks of the McLaren. I think it is simply, beautiful. On looks alone I'd take one over any modern Ferrari. But then some chaps prefer blondes, other brunettes....

I like the theory that the journos don't want to upset their regular trips to northern Italy - I suppose it is more glam than a quick drive down to Woking!

But is there anyone in the professional press who has come-out as prefering the McLaren? And when is Fifth Gear testing them - or TG back on.

Away from the mainstream motoring press is there a similar "group-think" verdict going on?

Funk

27,659 posts

238 months

Thursday 16th June 2011
quotequote all
The McLaren just lacks visual flair and drama when compared to something like a 458. I really dislike the back of the 12C, for example, whereas the 458 looks stunning.

vladcjelli

3,370 posts

187 months

Thursday 16th June 2011
quotequote all
ZeeTacoe said:
vladcjelli said:
What is that? It looks quite good.
No idea. I just typed in "Wannabe supercars" as a google image search, and sifted through for a few likely candidates. Will go back and check. Something Korean if memory serves.

vladcjelli

3,370 posts

187 months

Thursday 16th June 2011
quotequote all
vladcjelli said:
ZeeTacoe said:
vladcjelli said:
What is that? It looks quite good.
No idea. I just typed in "Wannabe supercars" as a google image search, and sifted through for a few likely candidates. Will go back and check. Something Korean if memory serves.
Found the Spirra from Oullim Motors. Quick write up here.

If you find out anything else interesting, let us know.

Jonty355

4,423 posts

242 months

Thursday 16th June 2011
quotequote all
davepoth said:
The MP4-12c is a better car, the 458 is a better supercar.
Thats sort of the case when comparing any Ferrari to any other Supercar.

911 and whichever Ferrari is around at the time, the 911 is more reliable, practical, cheaper to run, just as quick if not quicker..... but which gives the biggest thrill?

I always admit Ferraris are a pain in the backside to live with, but I never swap mine for a Porsche, even though they're the better car.

I can only imagine the same is with the MP4-12c, might be the better car, but does it thrill like the 458?