Front Fog lights - MOT failure?
Front Fog lights - MOT failure?
Author
Discussion

6potdave

Original Poster:

2,777 posts

242 months

Tuesday 5th July 2011
quotequote all
Both the fog lights on my MR2 don't work - I assume it's the bulbs as only one worked when I bought it now the other one doesn't either. It's due for it's MOT soon and I don't have the time to change them as I'm working every hour god sends right now! I'm not being lazy here the screws are rusted in and will require drilling out and then replacing which I simply don't have time for! However if it's an MOT failure I'll have to make time I guess but as some cars don't have them am I right to assume they aren't a part of the MOT?

Deva Link

26,934 posts

274 months

Tuesday 5th July 2011
quotequote all
Front fogs aren't part of MOT.

Aviz

1,669 posts

198 months

Tuesday 5th July 2011
quotequote all
Deva Link said:
Front fogs aren't part of MOT.
Yep. Classed as optional so not tested

6potdave

Original Poster:

2,777 posts

242 months

Tuesday 5th July 2011
quotequote all
Brilliant! Thanks, all I need to know biggrin

S3_Graham

12,835 posts

228 months

Tuesday 5th July 2011
quotequote all
gf's car passed with a smashed front one. for info.

Deva Link

26,934 posts

274 months

Tuesday 5th July 2011
quotequote all
S3_Graham said:
gf's car passed with a smashed front one. for info.
It could fail if the broken glass was considered hazardous.

Classic Grad 98

26,500 posts

189 months

Tuesday 5th July 2011
quotequote all
  • REAR foglights are not optional, but fronts are.

Aviz

1,669 posts

198 months

Tuesday 5th July 2011
quotequote all
On a similar theme.. A spare wheel is optional, but if it's there I believe it needs to be legal.

Mr E

23,051 posts

288 months

Tuesday 5th July 2011
quotequote all
Aviz said:
On a similar theme.. A spare wheel is optional, but if it's there I believe it needs to be legal.
I believe a spare is no longer checked either.

Mr E

23,051 posts

288 months

Tuesday 5th July 2011
quotequote all
Aviz said:
On a similar theme.. A spare wheel is optional, but if it's there I believe it needs to be legal.
I believe a spare is no longer checked either.

GC8

19,910 posts

219 months

Tuesday 5th July 2011
quotequote all
No it doesnt! Why do people keep repeating this same rubbish on forums?

Aviz

1,669 posts

198 months

Tuesday 5th July 2011
quotequote all
GC8 said:
No it doesnt! Why do people keep repeating this same rubbish on forums?
Was that aimed at me ? Maybe I'm a bit out of touch then smile

todd69

240 posts

243 months

Tuesday 5th July 2011
quotequote all
I always thought that if any aux lights were wired in then they had to work?


GC8

19,910 posts

219 months

Tuesday 5th July 2011
quotequote all
Aaaaaaaaaaaggggggggggggggggggghhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh !

biggrin

todd69

240 posts

243 months

Tuesday 5th July 2011
quotequote all
GC8 said:
Aaaaaaaaaaaggggggggggggggggggghhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh !

biggrin
Ok then, 2 years ago my shogun failed its mot because one of my spot lights had a cracked lens, was told that if I disconnect them it would then pass.

Friend over on the isle of mull had a non working front fog light, they failed on this.

Now that's two different garages and that's what my previous post was based on.

If It's not the case then someone should tell the mot testers LOL.

Ozzie Osmond

21,189 posts

275 months

Wednesday 6th July 2011
quotequote all
1. If the MOT manual says it has to be present and working it has to be present and working. Lights, wipers, brakes, 4 tyres, whatever.

2. If it's NOT required by the manual it's NOT required and does NOT have to work. But if there's anything which looks potentially dangerous it can trigger an advisory or a fail at the tester's discretion. Broken lights, buckled bodywork, broken window glass, dodgy spare tyre etc etc.

Rich_W

12,548 posts

241 months

Wednesday 6th July 2011
quotequote all
Ozzie Osmond said:
1. If the MOT manual says it has to be present and working it has to be present and working. Lights, wipers, brakes, 4 tyres, whatever.

2. If it's NOT required by the manual it's NOT required and does NOT have to work. But if there's anything which looks potentially dangerous it can trigger an advisory or a fail at the tester's discretion. Broken lights, buckled bodywork, broken window glass, dodgy spare tyre etc etc.
Care to explain? It's very simple. Unless it's one of the options on the screen my descretion doesn't come into it. Broken Window glass isn't a fail. Bald spare tyre isn't a fail. Buckled bodywork isn't a fail unless it falls under "sharp edges" (and that's basically if walking/driving past the vehicle is dangerous. Not if you have to get down on hands and knees and poke the sharp bit.) if a front fog is broken it's not a fail. It's not for the tester to say "well the spare is bald I better fail it" There's no way I CAN fail it on that even if I was dodgy.

Edited by Rich_W on Wednesday 6th July 20:27

tercelgold

969 posts

186 months

Wednesday 6th July 2011
quotequote all
Deva Link said:
It could fail if the broken glass was considered hazardous.
Got a fail for that, they removed it and retested and it passed.

mcford

819 posts

203 months

Thursday 7th July 2011
quotequote all
The inspection for sharp edges is in section 6.1 of the manual which applies to the bodywork. Lights, glass and mirrors aren't body work and they are checked under different sections of the manual where there are no resasons for rejection citing sharp edges. You can even have bumper irons sticking out of the front of the car that could cause injury and still not get a fail as long as they haven't got any sharp edges caused by damage or corrosion.

The most that any broken glass on a non obligatory light should get would be an advisory.