Is this fronting?
Author
Discussion

43034

Original Poster:

2,971 posts

189 months

Thursday 7th July 2011
quotequote all
Is having a parent as the policy holder and myself as a named driver (but the named driver being the main driver) fronting or not?

I'm well aware of the conventional fronting and I'm not going down that route but was wondering if the above is legal, or not.

Many thanks,

43034.

KardioKate

1,584 posts

175 months

Thursday 7th July 2011
quotequote all
That's exactly fronting. Put your parents on as secondary drivers - they often drive my car and it brought my premium down loads, but I'm still the main driver.

kambites

70,349 posts

242 months

Thursday 7th July 2011
quotequote all
No, it's perfectly legal.

Fronting is when you lie about who will be the main driver. As long as you tell the insurance company who will drive the car most, it doesn't matter who holds the policy.

Aizle

12,429 posts

196 months

Thursday 7th July 2011
quotequote all
kambites said:
No, it's perfectly legal.

Fronting is when you lie about who will be the main driver. As long as you tell the insurance company who will drive the car most, it doesn't matter who holds the policy.
This, not the above poster.

43034

Original Poster:

2,971 posts

189 months

Thursday 7th July 2011
quotequote all
Thought it was. Best to be safe though!

Got a Vauxhall Chevette 1256 down from £1800 to £500 doing it.

Might try something more mainstream now though hehe

TheEnd

15,370 posts

209 months

Thursday 7th July 2011
quotequote all
Aizle said:
kambites said:
No, it's perfectly legal.

Fronting is when you lie about who will be the main driver. As long as you tell the insurance company who will drive the car most, it doesn't matter who holds the policy.
This, not the above poster.
Negative-

"Is having a parent as the policy holder and myself as a named driver (but the named driver being the main driver) fronting or not? "


Policy Holder = main driver
named driver = occasional user




otolith

64,541 posts

225 months

Thursday 7th July 2011
quotequote all
It is legal for the policyholder not to be the main driver, but it may be unhelpful in getting good insurance quotes. Some insurers don't like it and won't quote, and anything that reduces the pool of quotes is not in your interests.

43034

Original Poster:

2,971 posts

189 months

Thursday 7th July 2011
quotequote all
Sorry, realised i've worded it wrong but I mean declaring that the named driver is the main driver.

Some people realised what I meant though!!

Apologies.

TheEnd

15,370 posts

209 months

Thursday 7th July 2011
quotequote all
That's OK then, as long as the insurance company know who the main drive is, it's fine.
Fronting is saying you are an occasional driver when you are the main driver.

KardioKate

1,584 posts

175 months

Thursday 7th July 2011
quotequote all
43034 said:
Sorry, realised i've worded it wrong but I mean declaring that the named driver is the main driver.

Some people realised what I meant though!!

Apologies.
Gotcha - Took the OP to mean that you wouldn't be declared the main driver, apologies.

43034

Original Poster:

2,971 posts

189 months

Thursday 7th July 2011
quotequote all
43034 said:
Got a Vauxhall Chevette 1256 down from £1800 to £500 doing it.
Appears I didn't though as it deleted me as the named main driver so it was a quote for just my dear old mother.

Is anyone aware of any companies that gives you the option to declare a named driver as the main driver? Struggling to find any!!


kambites

70,349 posts

242 months

Thursday 7th July 2011
quotequote all
43034 said:
Is anyone aware of any companies that gives you the option to declare a named driver as the main driver? Struggling to find any!!
I do it with Elephant on my wife's car, but it might be a bit different for a married couple.

Fastra

4,286 posts

230 months

Thursday 7th July 2011
quotequote all
So does it matter who actually owns the car then?

kambites

70,349 posts

242 months

Thursday 7th July 2011
quotequote all
Fastra said:
So does it matter who actually owns the car then?
Most insurance companies wont let you take out a policy on a car you don't own, I don't think.

Fastra

4,286 posts

230 months

Thursday 7th July 2011
quotequote all
kambites said:
Most insurance companies wont let you take out a policy on a car you don't own, I don't think.
So would the argument be that you can't be the main driver on a car you don't own?

kambites

70,349 posts

242 months

Thursday 7th July 2011
quotequote all
Fastra said:
So would the argument be that you can't be the main driver on a car you don't own?
No, that you can't be the policy holder on a car you don't own. You can be main driver.

DocJock

8,722 posts

261 months

Thursday 7th July 2011
quotequote all
Direct Line let my wife (Policyholder) put our daughter down as a named driver and also the main driver.

falkster

4,258 posts

224 months

Thursday 7th July 2011
quotequote all
Strange one really! All 5 of my cars have me as policy holder and my wife as a named driver but never have I been asked who will be the main driver. That would be a difficult one to explain too!! We both drive the two daily cars about the same each.

Fastra

4,286 posts

230 months

Thursday 7th July 2011
quotequote all
kambites said:
No, that you can't be the policy holder on a car you don't own. You can be main driver.
ah - cheers!

smile

Engineer1

10,486 posts

230 months

Thursday 7th July 2011
quotequote all
falkster said:
Strange one really! All 5 of my cars have me as policy holder and my wife as a named driver but never have I been asked who will be the main driver. That would be a difficult one to explain too!! We both drive the two daily cars about the same each.
Because in a marriage they assume cars are common property, in the you grab the keys closest to hand or use the car that's cleanest, got the full tank or is best suited to the journey you are about to take, Insurers don't really care who the main driver is in that situation.