Best bhp/ton ratio on PH
Best bhp/ton ratio on PH
Author
Discussion

vrsmxtb

Original Poster:

2,003 posts

185 months

Tuesday 12th July 2011
quotequote all
Inspired by the average bhp thread, which of the vehicles you've owned has had the best bhp/ton ratio?

In PH style I will kick off with my best: MX-5 at a lowly 119 bhp/ton

Worst: 1988 Transit with probably about 30 bhp/ton!

GravelBen

16,495 posts

259 months

Tuesday 12th July 2011
quotequote all
vrsmxtb said:
In PH style I will kick off with my best: MX-5 at a lowly 119 bhp/ton
hehe

I'll respond with mine: MX5 at a lowly ~280bhp/ton wink

edo

16,699 posts

294 months

Tuesday 12th July 2011
quotequote all
It's going to be a caterfield I would say.

When I had a 250bhp Westfield, that was pretty close to 1/2 a tonne, so 500bhp/tonne.

Slinky

15,704 posts

278 months

Tuesday 12th July 2011
quotequote all
I'll chuck Redvictor's score in early...

Approximately 2,358 hp/ton ...

evil

pinchmeimdreamin

10,892 posts

247 months

Tuesday 12th July 2011
quotequote all
How much does RV3 weigh ?

Gad-Westy

16,571 posts

242 months

Tuesday 12th July 2011
quotequote all
I think Red victor may have this thread sewn up nicely.

Personally:

Best: 428 bhp/tonnne for my Westfield

Worst: 69 bhp/tonne 1.3 Polo

Edited by Gad-Westy on Tuesday 12th July 14:42

Slinky

15,704 posts

278 months

Tuesday 12th July 2011
quotequote all
pinchmeimdreamin said:
How much does RV3 weigh ?
2800lbs wet, with driver..

Greg_D

6,542 posts

275 months

Tuesday 12th July 2011
quotequote all
RV is technically a road car, so it is valid, and the winner.

my Track car may get 2nd place, it has an MOT and a V5 and is 666bhp/ton

FurballS2000

1,063 posts

194 months

Tuesday 12th July 2011
quotequote all
JamieP's supra must have pretty good power-to-weight as its running around 1000bhp.

Not sure what it weighs though.

v8will

3,310 posts

225 months

Tuesday 12th July 2011
quotequote all
FurballS2000 said:
JamieP's supra must have pretty good power-to-weight as its running around 1000bhp.

Not sure what it weighs though.
Well over 700BHP/tonne I'd guess

Nedz

2,439 posts

203 months

Tuesday 12th July 2011
quotequote all
My westfield has a tweaked busa engine which has showed 221 BHP,not sure what it weighs but it cant be more than 500kgs so i reckon its round about 450 BHP/tonne.Certainly feels it!

ewenm

28,506 posts

274 months

Tuesday 12th July 2011
quotequote all
Remember to include the driver in the weights wink A 500bhp/ton car without a driver is just an ornament. Of course this penalises those of us with light cars somewhat.

John D.

20,999 posts

238 months

Tuesday 12th July 2011
quotequote all
Someone must have a S1000RR on here? wink 950bhp/tonne I believe (until some fat bd sits on it of course).

I am quoting MCN so shoot me if I'm wrong biggrinhttp://www.motorcyclenews.com/MCN/News/newsresults...


vrsmxtb

Original Poster:

2,003 posts

185 months

Tuesday 12th July 2011
quotequote all
Tonsko said:
My only: Golf R32 with approx. 0.2 BHP/T
Tonsko, how does it move??

thinfourth2

32,414 posts

233 months

Tuesday 12th July 2011
quotequote all
vrsmxtb said:
Tonsko said:
My only: Golf R32 with approx. 0.2 BHP/T
Tonsko, how does it move??
Slowly?

Slinky

15,704 posts

278 months

Tuesday 12th July 2011
quotequote all
John D. said:
Someone must have a S1000RR on here? wink 950/tonne I believe (until some fat bd sits on it of course).

I am quoting MCN so shoot me if I'm wrong biggrinhttp://www.motorcyclenews.com/MCN/News/newsresults...
Dropping an 85Kg rider onto it brings the hp/ton figure back down to 667..

John D.

20,999 posts

238 months

Tuesday 12th July 2011
quotequote all
Slinky said:
John D. said:
Someone must have a S1000RR on here? wink 950/tonne I believe (until some fat bd sits on it of course).

I am quoting MCN so shoot me if I'm wrong biggrinhttp://www.motorcyclenews.com/MCN/News/newsresults...
Dropping an 85Kg rider onto it brings the hp/ton figure back down to 667..
Fancy that.

Nedz

2,439 posts

203 months

Tuesday 12th July 2011
quotequote all
ewenm said:
Remember to include the driver in the weights wink A 500bhp/ton car without a driver is just an ornament. Of course this penalises those of us with light cars somewhat.
I would've thought when car/bike power to weight ratios are quoted by manufacturers or in magazines etc,they would be without a driver/rider present? As already mentioned most bike power to weight ratios will almost half when a fat tt in his leathers gets on it!

300bhp/ton

41,030 posts

219 months

Tuesday 12th July 2011
quotequote all
Nedz said:
ewenm said:
Remember to include the driver in the weights wink A 500bhp/ton car without a driver is just an ornament. Of course this penalises those of us with light cars somewhat.
I would've thought when car/bike power to weight ratios are quoted by manufacturers or in magazines etc,they would be without a driver/rider present? As already mentioned most bike power to weight ratios will almost half when a fat tt in his leathers gets on it!
Well exactly, but I think that was ewenm's point.

Any "claimed" figure from a car maker will be without driver - too much of a variable.

trickywoo

14,154 posts

259 months

Tuesday 12th July 2011
quotequote all
Nedz said:
As already mentioned most bike power to weight ratios will almost half when a fat tt in his leathers gets on it!
Agreed but even with a pie botherer and a full tank of fuel on board a 1000cc sports bike isn't going to weigh more than 300Kg. With 180 bhp +.

Cars loose a lot of power from the flywheel to the tyres don't forget. I'd guess a 180 bhp bike would have circa 150 bhp at the wheel.