Golf GT TDI 170 MK5's what are they like ?
Golf GT TDI 170 MK5's what are they like ?
Author
Discussion

RetroTed

Original Poster:

1,029 posts

231 months

Thursday 18th August 2011
quotequote all
As I am toying with getting one. Are they any good or should I get an A3 2.0 Tdi s line 06- instead
Pro's and cons welcomed thumbup

bronze kneecap

70 posts

182 months

Thursday 18th August 2011
quotequote all
Great for the few months i had it before it got nicked!

Black 3dr.. really did like that car.

Not all bad as i now have a gtd....

mocca

344 posts

177 months

Thursday 18th August 2011
quotequote all
Pretty nice smooth torquey delivery from the engine, a great all rounder in all things except delivering driving thrills/tactility. A competent tool.

As for a3s, much prefer them. The only real difference apart from the looks is the interior which is much better and the concert and symphony stereo are better than anything you'll find in a golf.

va1o

16,094 posts

229 months

Saturday 20th August 2011
quotequote all
DPF...

Rich_W

12,548 posts

234 months

Saturday 20th August 2011
quotequote all
va1o said:
DPF...
Depends on the age. Not all have them

va1o

16,094 posts

229 months

Saturday 20th August 2011
quotequote all
Rich_W said:
Depends on the age. Not all have them
All 170s do, it's only the 140 that doesn't always have it

Rich_W

12,548 posts

234 months

Saturday 20th August 2011
quotequote all
For some reason I have in my head that the very first mk5 170s didn't. But a quick Google says that might not be the case. laugh


AndyT77

1,755 posts

184 months

Saturday 20th August 2011
quotequote all
I had one for two weeks when my ex pranged her MX5 (insurance courtesy car). I like it a lot, it was quick through the gears, good cruiser on the motorway and reasonably economical. I'd have one.

kentmotorcompany

2,471 posts

232 months

Saturday 20th August 2011
quotequote all
Really nice car, good all rounder. Find one with leather and you have very desirable car.

DPF is less of a problem than the internet makes out. If you understand how it works you will have less chance of it clogging up, and know how to correct it if it does. Don't buy one if you predominately drive short journeys.

Injectors are also a worry. Very expensive, some cars outside of warranty were replaced by VW under good will, so if you have full VW history and have the problem you have a fair chance of VW doing it FOC.

LocoBlade

7,653 posts

278 months

Saturday 20th August 2011
quotequote all
Agreed that the biggest issue with the 170 engine is not the DPF (although thats fairly costly if it goes), its the injectors, which are quite prone to failing at 70-100k and are bloomin expensive to replace, think £400 parts plus another £200 labour for each injector. My wife's got a 2007 Seat Altea FR with that engine and we've had two injectors fail on us, both times the engine cuts completely with absolutely no warning, once stranding her on a busy roundabout, the second she was only just able to get to a safe side road to avoid being stuck on a fast country B road.

We've had a few Seats over the last 10 years and thankfully for us it counted for something as Seat were brilliant about it. Despite being 9 months / 20k out of warranty and not having bought it from a Seat dealership, they covered the cost of the first failure and when the second one went a couple of months later, agreed to pay the failed one plus the two remaining original injectors all FOC.

Still, its far from ideal as I've yet to rebuild my full confidence in it despite all 4 being replaced, and if you're not lucky enough to get the failures covered under warranty/good will then its an extremely expensive fault to fix.


Edited by LocoBlade on Saturday 20th August 20:41

RetroTed

Original Poster:

1,029 posts

231 months

Saturday 20th August 2011
quotequote all
Change of plan I have just purchased a 57 plate a3,s line 2.0 tdi 170 instead of the golf. I feel that for a few extra pounds i have got a far superior car and I'm well chuffeddriving