A theoretical question
Author
Discussion

rottie102

Original Poster:

4,033 posts

205 months

Wednesday 31st August 2011
quotequote all
What standard car or what performance levels would be required for a car to lose the traction at 85mph and in fifth gear?
As in you're travelling on a motorway, it's dry, good road surface and you have reasonably sized, good tyres. You're doing 85mph in fifth gear. And then you floor it.

Is there anything that loses traction in those conditions? I'm assuming AWD would be out of the question.



Edited by rottie102 on Wednesday 31st August 00:59

The Nur

9,168 posts

206 months

Wednesday 31st August 2011
quotequote all
A Murcielago with the traction control off may do it. Might require a good, sharp shove of the throttle from very little to do it though.

paulrussell

2,291 posts

182 months

Wednesday 31st August 2011
quotequote all
I don't think any standard car could do that.

Egg Chaser

4,954 posts

188 months

Wednesday 31st August 2011
quotequote all
I think there's too many variables to consider to give a definitive answer of how much power you would need. Gear ratios, final drive ratio, tyre width, tyre circumference, etc.

But you would need a lot of power. I doubt any standard production cars could do it.

EDLT

15,421 posts

227 months

Wednesday 31st August 2011
quotequote all
A TVR of some sort?

sebhaque

6,534 posts

202 months

Wednesday 31st August 2011
quotequote all
Not sure on your original question, but I have a video of a Hennessey Ford GT (~1000bhp) getting some wheelspin at 140mph.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FZmFGmIteXI


davepoth

29,395 posts

220 months

Wednesday 31st August 2011
quotequote all
Losing traction in 5th at 85mph in the dry is something manufacturers actively design out of their cars surely?

simoid

19,774 posts

179 months

Wednesday 31st August 2011
quotequote all
Howsabout a Merc AMG with one of the dozen(ish)-speed gearboxes?

That might be the closest in terms of production cars. Are the powerful Lambos all 4WD? Would it be possible in one of the most powerful Caterhams?

0aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

24,059 posts

215 months

Wednesday 31st August 2011
quotequote all
A powerful heavily turbocharged FWD

DanB7290

5,535 posts

211 months

Wednesday 31st August 2011
quotequote all
Maybe a Caparo in the wet

dudleybloke

20,553 posts

207 months

Wednesday 31st August 2011
quotequote all
depends on how good (or crap) your tyres are.

Noger

7,117 posts

270 months

Wednesday 31st August 2011
quotequote all
Gaz. said:
Surely a R500 at 85 in 5th is going to be well off cam & gutless? At that speed I wouldn't have thought it would have much more than 150bhp or 125 lbs.ft of torque, assuming it would be at 4.5k.

I can't think of any standard car that would do it.
5.3k assuming the non-sequential box and 22" diameter tyres.

So, say 200bhp. Minus 30hp aero drag at 85mph. Allowing for drive train losses that is still around 300bhp/tonne...hardly gutless smile

Thus about 2.9kN thrust. 600kg (including normal sized driver) car thus about .5g (4.8 m/s^-2) acceleration. Probably not enough to break traction on a dry road.

blindswelledrat

25,257 posts

253 months

Wednesday 31st August 2011
quotequote all
Im hazarding a guess that this is the result of a pub argument where a mate said he did this?

If everything is working properly in normal conditions then it can't really be done.
However I have heard of this happening a few times with people who have something wrong with the car but I can't remember what the common cause is.

thinfourth2

32,414 posts

225 months

Wednesday 31st August 2011
quotequote all
The answer is

A poorly designed one


No performance car should spin its wheels unless you abuse it

mnkiboy

4,409 posts

187 months

Wednesday 31st August 2011
quotequote all
I once managed wheelspin at motorway speeds in my chipped Leon Cupra.
Floored it in 6th at about 70mph and saw the traction control light flicker.

This was last winter, and it turns out that while the road looked dry, it was very cold and greasy.

Panicked me a little as everyone was driving as if the road was dry, when in reality we only had about 25% of the grip we thought we had.

roachcoach

3,975 posts

176 months

Wednesday 31st August 2011
quotequote all
0aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa said:
A powerful heavily turbocharged FWD
I doubt it, because even in my (thoroughly modest) machine...85 is made for high end 3rd/shifting to 4th. To have it geared to get wheelspin at that speed, in 5th...unlikely I think.


I don't think you will find a car that will do it in 5th at that speed which hasn't been messed with specifically to do it//really weird gear ratios.


I stand to be proven wrong, it will be interesting.

ETA: On a re-read my point is unclear - it was that as car get more powerful they are designed to sit (in general terms) in lower gears for longer and to higher speeds to maximise the power/acceleration - you're looking for something geared like a 1.0 but with the power of something silly.

Edited by roachcoach on Wednesday 31st August 10:29

Ozzie Osmond

21,189 posts

267 months

Wednesday 31st August 2011
quotequote all
Won't happen.

I'm not clever enough to show the calculations but the amount of torque required at the wheel would demand truly MONSTER torque from the engine.

Remember a gearbox is essentially a "torque multiplier". Most 5th gears are 1:1 ratio (or close to it) so there is no multiplication whatsoever. i.e. 1 x 1 = 1

There's just not enough torque to break traction.

roachcoach

3,975 posts

176 months

Wednesday 31st August 2011
quotequote all
And while I'm here, I have to ask why?

Why at all, and why 5th?

Greg_D

6,542 posts

267 months

Wednesday 31st August 2011
quotequote all
i agree that a car that is working as intended is very unlikely to do it, but it could be made to happen fairly easily.

600hp focus RS, boot loaded with bags of cement running comically overinflated space saver spares on both front tyres on a concrete motorway section, open diff (didn't say anything about both tyres spinning), terribly setup suspension etc. would probably get the job done, lol...

Edited by Greg_D on Wednesday 31st August 12:28

edo

16,699 posts

286 months

Wednesday 31st August 2011
quotequote all
Noger said:
5.3k assuming the non-sequential box and 22" diameter tyres.
22" wheels on a Caterham?!?