new or old damage?
Discussion
she reversed in to me while i was geting into my car, she immediatly moved her car before i could get a picture of the cars together
she started shouting that i had hit her, i had my wife and kids with me, so i have witnesses
she is claiming that the end section of my bumper caused the damage shown in my opening post
this is my car, the bumper is way too high to have caused that damage, and to me the damage looks old

she started shouting that i had hit her, i had my wife and kids with me, so i have witnesses
she is claiming that the end section of my bumper caused the damage shown in my opening post
this is my car, the bumper is way too high to have caused that damage, and to me the damage looks old

Difficult to make out with the pic, but are the edges there sharp and/or sheared? More like the driver had hit a solid well defined post rather than being impacted by a curved (and I daresay deformable) bumper?
ETA: just noticed the damage on the higher part of the arch - that definitely looks old... and would need to be a glancing blow to do damgage over that height range without pushing the panel in futher?
ETA: just noticed the damage on the higher part of the arch - that definitely looks old... and would need to be a glancing blow to do damgage over that height range without pushing the panel in futher?
Edited by LooneyTunes on Wednesday 21st September 19:28
well this just gets better, i've had a letter today from some Ambiwlans chaser scum, not only does she now say i hit her, she also want's to claim for whiplash and loss of 4 days earnings due to injury, W.T.F. is this woman on?
how the heck would you get whiplash from an accident that caused that little bit of damage?
the only good thing i can say is that i have a great insurance company, instead of just giving in or asking me to go 50-50, they intend to fight her all the way
how the heck would you get whiplash from an accident that caused that little bit of damage?
the only good thing i can say is that i have a great insurance company, instead of just giving in or asking me to go 50-50, they intend to fight her all the way
mrmr96 said:
Ho could she claim you hit her if she reversed into you whilst you were getting into your car?
I assume your car wasn't running and therefore not moving at the time?
it looks like she's a first rate scam artist, people like this really make my p1ss boilI assume your car wasn't running and therefore not moving at the time?
no my car wasn't even running
Well this is getting silly, this claim is still ongoing
An impartial body work man inspected both cars, he told the insurers that my car couldn't have caused the damage, but her insurers still won't admit that they are wrong and she is a scammer.
I have no idea what will happen next.
This is the vectra that they say i hit with my back bumper

And this is my back bumper, that is 21 inchs high, how can her insurers still be fighting this?

An impartial body work man inspected both cars, he told the insurers that my car couldn't have caused the damage, but her insurers still won't admit that they are wrong and she is a scammer.
I have no idea what will happen next.
This is the vectra that they say i hit with my back bumper

And this is my back bumper, that is 21 inchs high, how can her insurers still be fighting this?

mrmr96 said:
Ho could she claim you hit her if she reversed into you whilst you were getting into your car?
I assume your car wasn't running and therefore not moving at the time?
Absolutely! OP can you clarify exactly what happened? were you driving at the time? She sounds like a broke fraudster and I would be inclined to report her to the police - its why our insurance premiums are so high!!!I assume your car wasn't running and therefore not moving at the time?
Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff




