Why DO people remove/keep thermostats open?
Why DO people remove/keep thermostats open?
Author
Discussion

bull996

Original Poster:

1,442 posts

229 months

Tuesday 4th October 2011
quotequote all
Chap at work just changed his thermostat as it was running a bit cool. When he took the old one out, someone had removed the stat bit, so it was permanently open, hence the cool running.

Now I have heard that people do this when they overheating issues, but I JUST cant work out why!

The stat is closed when cold, so that the water dosent circulate in the radiator so it warms up fast.

When warm, the stat opens, sending water rond the radiator, keeping it cool.

Now, if someones car is overheating, then why remove/force the stat to stay open, when it would be open anyway (as the car running too hot)?

FWIW, he drove the car for 20 mins and left it idling for 20 mins and temp gauge stayed bang on half.

Am I being thick? (Not unusual)

Stu R

21,414 posts

235 months

Tuesday 4th October 2011
quotequote all
It's an easy way to see if the stat's the problem. If it is and they remove / 'adjust' it, water circulates as normal and no overheating. I guess if it cures the problem, swapping it out for a working one will be placed firmly towards the bottom of the 'important stuff to do' list and get forgotten about.

They can be fickle little things too of course.

Cotty

41,684 posts

304 months

Tuesday 4th October 2011
quotequote all
bull996 said:
Now, if someones car is overheating, then why remove/force the stat to stay open, when it would be open anyway (as the car running too hot)?
Mine jammed in the closed position so overheated, if it had jammed in the open position I probably would not have noticed.

bull996

Original Poster:

1,442 posts

229 months

Tuesday 4th October 2011
quotequote all
Cotty said:
Mine jammed in the closed position so overheated, if it had jammed in the open position I probably would not have noticed.
Yep, I understand that-makes sense.

But I dont understand why you want it permanently open.

Mr2Mike

20,143 posts

275 months

Tuesday 4th October 2011
quotequote all
People often seem to think a thermostat is a undesirable restriction to coolant flow and that removing will magically cure overheating problems, without understanding the implications.

Dab of oppo

543 posts

206 months

Tuesday 4th October 2011
quotequote all
Seems on the pointless side to me, as already said its not a magic cure, it just takes the already faulty car longer to warm up.
I change mine along with the water pump when I change the cam belt and tensioners on my vehicles - so cheap, but soooo much trouble if they go wrong!

bull996

Original Poster:

1,442 posts

229 months

Tuesday 4th October 2011
quotequote all
Dab of oppo said:
Seems on the pointless side to me, as already said its not a magic cure, it just takes the already faulty car longer to warm up.
I change mine along with the water pump when I change the cam belt and tensioners on my vehicles - so cheap, but soooo much trouble if they go wrong!
Thats the way I think. However, there doesnt seem to be problem now its repplaced, so why do it in the first please?

(Unless there was other problems that have been fixed AFTER trying the stat?)

Mr2Mike

20,143 posts

275 months

Tuesday 4th October 2011
quotequote all
Dab of oppo said:
Seems on the pointless side to me, as already said its not a magic cure, it just takes the already faulty car longer to warm up.
They likely will never warm up properly without a thermostat, especially in cooler weather. Without a 'stat, the coolant temperature is effectively controlled by ambient air temperature.

redstu

2,287 posts

259 months

Tuesday 4th October 2011
quotequote all
If the coolant stays cooler then the pressure will also be lower, this can hide fluid leaks when it comes time to sell.

Fish981

1,441 posts

205 months

Tuesday 4th October 2011
quotequote all
They're normally the same people who think a piece of cardboard in front of the radiator will make the car warm up faster.

mcford

819 posts

194 months

Tuesday 4th October 2011
quotequote all
I think that on the E series engine as used in the Maxi and Allegro, that removing the thermostat interfered with the coolant flow to such an extent that there would be no coolant flow around one of the cylinders, leading to the demise of the engine.

Tunku

7,703 posts

248 months

Tuesday 4th October 2011
quotequote all
Won't a colder engine run richer, meaning a bit more power? Assuming the missing thermostat fools the ECU?

Ozzie Osmond

21,189 posts

266 months

Tuesday 4th October 2011
quotequote all
They are, quite simply, idiots. Fiddling about with thermostats shows a lack of understanding of the basics.

crolandc

290 posts

216 months

Tuesday 4th October 2011
quotequote all
This used to be the thing to do in ages past when the engine was about goosed ( using oil and breathing heavy ) it keeps engine cool and can give you a good few thousand more miles before scrap yard beckons.

HedgehogFromHell

2,072 posts

199 months

Tuesday 4th October 2011
quotequote all
Tunku said:
Won't a colder engine run richer, meaning a bit more power? Assuming the missing thermostat fools the ECU?
I thought it was run lean to get more power but with greater risk? Saying that it's been a hard day running up rivers... So I could be wrong.

wolf1

3,091 posts

270 months

Tuesday 4th October 2011
quotequote all
Or the engine was overheating due to a stuck thermostat and was temporarily removed/opened by a breakdown mechanic so they could get home or to the garage and they never bothered to get it fixed properly.

Dracoro

8,945 posts

265 months

Tuesday 4th October 2011
quotequote all
Tunku said:
Won't a colder engine run richer, meaning a bit more power? Assuming the missing thermostat fools the ECU?
Colder AIR improves performance (air density), not colder engines. That's what I remember anyway biggrin

Alfanatic

9,339 posts

239 months

Tuesday 4th October 2011
quotequote all
Because the removed one failed in the closed position, causing the overheating. Way back in the days of carbs and points and dizzies it was common to remove the thermostat and not bother to replace it, because it was one less thing to go wrong and an overheated engine is very bad but noone cared about an engine running too cold.

EDIT: Oh, as for testing one, stick it in a pot of water, then bring the water up to the boil on the hob and see if it opens.

Edited by Alfanatic on Tuesday 4th October 19:01

redstu

2,287 posts

259 months

Tuesday 4th October 2011
quotequote all
Tunku said:
Won't a colder engine run richer, meaning a bit more power? Assuming the missing thermostat fools the ECU?
It will use more fuel as it will take longer to get to operating temp, if it manages it at all. But not give more power as it won't be burning it efficiently.