RE: Driven: Ford Mustang Boss 302
RE: Driven: Ford Mustang Boss 302
Thursday 6th October 2011

Driven: Ford Mustang Boss 302

It might be faster around Laguna Seca than an M3, but is it still the 'boss' (groan) in Blighty?



Having a car with two keys is not out of the ordinary. And the drill usually goes like this: you put one on your key ring and give the other to your OH/pop it in a drawer somewhere as a spare then forget where you put it.

The Ford Mustang Boss 302, however, encourages a slightly different approach. Its second key (technically an aftermarket accessory - now there's a neat way to side-step emissions regs if ever we saw one) is called the TracKey. It engages a software upgrade on the Boss 302's powertrain control module (PCM) that alters more than 200 engine management parameters, most notably an increase in low-end torque.

Other tweakery to the 302's brain includes an adjustment to the variable cam timing, the ignition mapping, the engine braking, the fuelling, while as many soft 'daily-use edges are removed.


"It's not for use on the street" says Jeff Seaman, a Mustang powertrain engineer. "For example, the deceleration is set up to preserve the brakes, and the throttle response is very aggressive. A skilled driver on a closed course will really appreciate the benefits."

Not for use on the street. Ha. Naturally (as any petrolhead would), we ignored Mr Seaman's advice when we had the bright orange Boss in for a few days recently and, after a brief dalliance with the 'boring' key, switched to the red TracKey. Immediately, the disappointingly dull idle was replaced with a much more endearingly truculent, lumpy affair, reminiscent of a hot rod, or a 1960s stock car. Promising.


On the move, the more aggressive set-up is instantly noticeable, with a sharper throttle response, and a distinctly greater sense of urgency from the newly enlivened engine. Yes, the TracKey makes the Boss a little less smooth around town, but it's hardly horrendous and it's much more appropriate to a beefy orange muscle car (okay, pony car, but let's not split hairs). It feels, in short, like a fast American car should: rough-edged, potent, and just a little bit agricultural.

Agricultural is not how you'd describe the 5.0-litre quad-cam V8 once you're given the chance to get it wound up, however. Because this is a gem of an engine. Its trick cams and high rev limit, just as with its 1970s namesake, endow it with a real 1970s bespoke performance feel - this is a car that relishes in high revs in a way that's quite at odds with what you'd expect of a powerful Detroit V8.


It also thrusts you forward with a delicious throaty gargle that makes you wish you had a stretch sticky black two-lane Arizona black-top shimmering in the heat haze on which to mash the throttle, rather than an autumnal British B-road.

How bumpy that B-road is might also make you yearn for the smoother surfaces our Stateside cousins enjoy, because that live rear axle, despite the larger rear anti-roll bar, lowered springs (11mm at the front, 1mm at the rear) and adjustable shock absorbers still limits the Mustang's flexibility on all but the smoothest of roads. Having said that, it's still a fabulously impressive handler, with lovely, incisive steering and bags of grip (when the suspension isn't too taxed by bumps).


This, and interior plastics that would make a decade-old Focus blush, are definitely low points of the Boss, but well-placed pedals, a beautiful gearchange and that engine still make the car something that ought to make any car enthusiast dribble just a little bit.

Once you've done all the importing bits, mind, you'll be spending around £42k, and that puts it up against some rather talented opposition: lightly used M3s, Porsche Caymans (but you'll have to forego carrying more than one passenger), or even - for £7k less - a brand new Chevrolet Camaro...

Ford Mustang Boss 302 tech spec

Price: £42,000 (est)
0-62mph: 5.0sec
Top speed: 156mph (est)
Kerbweight: 1647kg;
Engine: V8, 4951cc,
Power: 440bhp at 7500rpm
Torque: 380lbft
Gearbox: 6-spd manual

Pics: GFWilliams

Author
Discussion

E38Ross

Original Poster:

36,484 posts

233 months

Thursday 6th October 2011
quotequote all
so they've purposefully targeted the M3, but (judging by your mention of ride quality) have forgotten one of it's key points....it's also a pretty comfortable cruiser when the roads aren't the smoothest....especially once you turn the EDC to its softest.

i think i've been looking at this from the wrong angle, because they were always claiming it as an M3 beater - so i assumed it was meant to be the sort of car the M3 was....it appears it isn't (tacky interiors and apparently harsh ride quality and the overtly flashy nature of the car....an M3 is supposed to be a little more subtle). it's just a bit of fast fun with plenty of thrills and i'm sure it's very, very good at what it's supposed to do; unless it is meant to be a pure M3 replacement.

Mastodon2

14,138 posts

186 months

Thursday 6th October 2011
quotequote all
E38Ross said:
so they've purposefully targeted the M3, but (judging by your mention of ride quality) have forgotten one of it's key points....it's also a pretty comfortable cruiser when the roads aren't the smoothest....especially once you turn the EDC to its softest.

i think i've been looking at this from the wrong angle, because they were always claiming it as an M3 beater - so i assumed it was meant to be the sort of car the M3 was....it appears it isn't (tacky interiors and apparently harsh ride quality and the overtly flashy nature of the car....an M3 is supposed to be a little more subtle). it's just a bit of fast fun with plenty of thrills and i'm sure it's very, very good at what it's supposed to do; unless it is meant to be a pure M3 replacement.
Anyone looking at the car for more than 5 seconds could probably deduce that it beats the M3 only in pace, it's obviously not designed to be as subtle / comfortable / tactile etc. I think it's brilliant though!

Hell27

1,564 posts

212 months

Thursday 6th October 2011
quotequote all
Yes it isn't the swift scalpel sharp instrument that the M3 is. Its a great big shouty muscle car with a loud V8 and goes well enough round corners. Looks amazing, and I think it's brilliant!

E38Ross

Original Poster:

36,484 posts

233 months

Thursday 6th October 2011
quotequote all
Hell27 said:
Yes it isn't the swift scalpel sharp instrument that the M3 is. Its a great big shouty muscle car with a loud V8 and goes well enough round corners. Looks amazing, and I think it's brilliant!
me too, as said, i was just looking at it the wrong way (thanks....marketing men!!), but as what it's meant to be, it's superb. not quite sure if it'd choose orange though...would look awesome in black biggrin

pacman1

7,323 posts

214 months

Thursday 6th October 2011
quotequote all
I like it. yes

Tin Hat

1,421 posts

230 months

Thursday 6th October 2011
quotequote all
2 keys - want

Dagnut

3,515 posts

214 months

Thursday 6th October 2011
quotequote all
E38Ross said:
so they've purposefully targeted the M3, but (judging by your mention of ride quality) have forgotten one of it's key points....it's also a pretty comfortable cruiser when the roads aren't the smoothest....especially once you turn the EDC to its softest.

i think i've been looking at this from the wrong angle, because they were always claiming it as an M3 beater - so i assumed it was meant to be the sort of car the M3 was....it appears it isn't (tacky interiors and apparently harsh ride quality and the overtly flashy nature of the car....an M3 is supposed to be a little more subtle). it's just a bit of fast fun with plenty of thrills and i'm sure it's very, very good at what it's supposed to do; unless it is meant to be a pure M3 replacement.
In the aul US of A it's probably half the price of a new M3..and it's still 10k cheaper here..no point in comparing it to a used car..the equivalent BMW on show room prices would be the 1M

rob.e

2,862 posts

299 months

Thursday 6th October 2011
quotequote all
Dagnut said:
In the aul US of A it's probably half the price of a new M3..and it's still 10k cheaper here..no point in comparing it to a used car..the equivalent BMW on show room prices would be the 1M
Its a shame its not "right" hand drive and £30k - that would be a much more convincing proposition..

They key thing is a great idea - i don't know why more manufacturers don't do that.

Owlwood

258 posts

177 months

Thursday 6th October 2011
quotequote all
It looks so out of place parked by the cur in that 2nd pic...

  • searches YouTube to hear the engine noise*

GroundEffect

13,864 posts

177 months

Thursday 6th October 2011
quotequote all
Power: 440bhp at 7500rpm

eek


300bhp/ton

41,030 posts

211 months

Thursday 6th October 2011
quotequote all
Nice, but if honest I prefer the regualr 5.0 GT.

vz-r_dave

3,469 posts

239 months

Thursday 6th October 2011
quotequote all
Wow PH writers are now quoting used car prices for comparisons, we are doomed.

jellison

12,803 posts

298 months

Thursday 6th October 2011
quotequote all
US punter will not like all those cams and extra valves and all the extra servicing that goes with it.

Good power number though. Would take a very tuned pushrod 302 to make that.

Pity it is so LARDY.

jellison

12,803 posts

298 months

Thursday 6th October 2011
quotequote all
US punter will not like all those cams and extra valves and all the extra servicing that goes with it.

Good power number though. Would take a very tuned pushrod 302 to make that.

Pity it is so LARDY.

jellison

12,803 posts

298 months

Thursday 6th October 2011
quotequote all
US punter will not like all those cams and extra valves and all the extra servicing that goes with it.

Good power number though. Would take a very tuned pushrod 302 to make that.

Pity it is so LARDY.

300bhp/ton

41,030 posts

211 months

Thursday 6th October 2011
quotequote all
jellison said:
US punter will not like all those cams and extra valves and all the extra servicing that goes with it.

Good power number though. Would take a very tuned pushrod 302 to make that.

Pity it is so LARDY.
The Cobra has been using DOHC V8's for over a decade, as did the sn95 Mach 1 and all Mustangs have been OHC since 1996.

As for lardy, well ok it weighs very similar to an e90 M3.... and less than a Shelby GT500, Camaro or Challenger.

devman85

20 posts

192 months

Thursday 6th October 2011
quotequote all
jellison said:
US punter will not like all those cams and extra valves and all the extra servicing that goes with it.

Good power number though. Would take a very tuned pushrod 302 to make that.

Pity it is so LARDY.
its actualy a few KG lighter than an M3! and as 300bhp/ton said this is not a pushrod engine.
Not sure about the performance figures 0-60 in 5secs hmm, ford quote 4.6 and mags test it around 4.1-4.3!
Shame it wasn't the laguna seca edition as that really is an M3 killer but amazing car love it!

anything fast

983 posts

185 months

Thursday 6th October 2011
quotequote all
not fast enough in my book... a £15,000 vette offers similar performance.. and a much higher top speed frown

looks crap as well.. if you want a BOSS mustang.. buy a real one from not a modern marketing ploy for people with rose tinted specs...

GFWilliams

4,946 posts

228 months

Thursday 6th October 2011
quotequote all
Can't say I'm a fan of the car. It's a good laugh, but no way is it worth over £40k IMO

SD1992

7,278 posts

179 months

Thursday 6th October 2011
quotequote all
I really like that, not sure about £42k though...