100k mile celica. Am I mad?
100k mile celica. Am I mad?
Author
Discussion

ZeeTacoe

Original Poster:

5,444 posts

243 months

Saturday 15th October 2011
quotequote all
Am I mad to even consider buying one of these with so many miles on the clock? There seem to be quite a few out there on autotrader and in the ph classifieds that look to be in decent condition despite the mileage.

Is this a cheap(£2k) , stylish coupe or a massive money pit?

(I'm talking about the last of the line ones BTW)

ambuletz

11,492 posts

202 months

Saturday 15th October 2011
quotequote all
Which celica is it? 7th gen or 6th gen one?

Hollywood Wheels

3,689 posts

251 months

Saturday 15th October 2011
quotequote all
Mileage wouldn't make any difference to me, it's all about condition and history. 100K miles is peanuts on a well maintained modern car.

o0myles0o

9,570 posts

192 months

Saturday 15th October 2011
quotequote all
My friend has a gen7 with 114k on the clock. I drove it just yesterday and it feels nice and tight still, although he was saying Toyota did a big recall due to some oil burning problem with the engine, which he hasnt had done. He says he will burn 1-1.5l of oil per 1000 miles. Check if it was done on the recall.

ZeeTacoe

Original Poster:

5,444 posts

243 months

Saturday 15th October 2011
quotequote all
ambuletz said:
Which celica is it? 7th gen or 6th gen one?
7th

cornet

1,471 posts

179 months

Saturday 15th October 2011
quotequote all
If it's a Gen 7 and either the T-Sport or the Facelift then it'll be fine.

V8A*ndy

3,697 posts

212 months

Saturday 15th October 2011
quotequote all
ZeeTacoe said:
7th
Timing chain will need checked at 100k. Pre facelift models (2002) had engine problems but not all. Mine didn't and it was a cracking motor.

paulmoonraker

2,850 posts

184 months

Saturday 15th October 2011
quotequote all
Depends on how many miles you plan on putting on it... Is it a daily?

Kong

1,503 posts

192 months

Saturday 15th October 2011
quotequote all
Lift bolts, lift bolts and lift bolts are the three things you need to check, otherwise these are very strong engines.

Jw Vw

4,900 posts

184 months

Saturday 15th October 2011
quotequote all
Hollywood Wheels said:
Mileage wouldn't make any difference to me, it's all about condition and history. 100K miles is peanuts on a well maintained modern car.
This.

End of thread.

ambuletz

11,492 posts

202 months

Saturday 15th October 2011
quotequote all
which are the ones that have the 190hp engines? (VVTLi). T-sport, and GT, but what else?
how does it vary with pre-facelift and facelift? its one of those bits that confused me. generally which are the ones to go for?

Kitchski

6,542 posts

252 months

Saturday 15th October 2011
quotequote all
I just don't get the obsession people have with mileage. In 1984, a Maxi with close to 95k miles on it was near the end of it's life.

In 2011, a 150k mile 1999 diesel Golf can handle daily service with little or no drama. The game's moved on. Just like speed limits and stopping distances in the highway code or obsolete almost, but no one has updated those either. Mind you, the standard of driving in this country is so poor it's probably best not to!

AAT1981

380 posts

212 months

Saturday 15th October 2011
quotequote all
ZeeTacoe said:
Am I mad to even consider buying one of these with so many miles on the clock? There seem to be quite a few out there on autotrader and in the ph classifieds that look to be in decent condition despite the mileage.

Is this a cheap(£2k) , stylish coupe or a massive money pit?

(I'm talking about the last of the line ones BTW)
I had a P plate 7A-FE (1.8 st) model a few years ago, bought it with 124k on the clock, ran it for two years, P/X it with 180ish on the clock and still ran with no issues, the only thing that did not work on the car was the air con, cracking motor it was....

Kong

1,503 posts

192 months

Saturday 15th October 2011
quotequote all
Kitchski said:
I just don't get the obsession people have with mileage. In 1984, a Maxi with close to 95k miles on it was near the end of it's life.

In 2011, a 150k mile 1999 diesel Golf can handle daily service with little or no drama. The game's moved on. Just like speed limits and stopping distances in the highway code or obsolete almost, but no one has updated those either. Mind you, the standard of driving in this country is so poor it's probably best not to!
I agree mileage isn't the most important thing, however i don't think the game has moved on much at all. Infact i think some manufacturers have got worse - BMW, Merc and Toyota for example, I reckon 20 years ago they were making more reliable engines than they are now.

Negative Creep

25,758 posts

248 months

Saturday 15th October 2011
quotequote all
Kong said:
Kitchski said:
I just don't get the obsession people have with mileage. In 1984, a Maxi with close to 95k miles on it was near the end of it's life.

In 2011, a 150k mile 1999 diesel Golf can handle daily service with little or no drama. The game's moved on. Just like speed limits and stopping distances in the highway code or obsolete almost, but no one has updated those either. Mind you, the standard of driving in this country is so poor it's probably best not to!
I agree mileage isn't the most important thing, however i don't think the game has moved on much at all. Infact i think some manufacturers have got worse - BMW, Merc and Toyota for example, I reckon 20 years ago they were making more reliable engines than they are now.
Interesting you should mention that. Someone on another forum posted some early 1990's scrapyard pictures. The average age of the cars there varied little from what I see today (around 8-10 years)

Kitchski

6,542 posts

252 months

Saturday 15th October 2011
quotequote all
Kong said:
I agree mileage isn't the most important thing, however i don't think the game has moved on much at all. Infact i think some manufacturers have got worse - BMW, Merc and Toyota for example, I reckon 20 years ago they were making more reliable engines than they are now.
Yeah I agree, there will be exceptions to the rule. But it's not just engines. A Maxi would have been on death's door because chances are there wasn't much left to weld to, the paint had deteriorated, the interior was worn through and every king pin or link joint that was supposed to be oiled during services wasn't because of lack of proper maintenance (something we still have today).

To flip that over, I bought a 2003 Xsara Picasso 2.0 HDI the other day (can't believe I admitted on PH but there) for less than £1k. It's done 115k miles and the only thing that doesn't work is the aircon because a pipe has been broken. Still does near 50mpg, doesn't rattle, doesn't smoke, drives straight and everything works (except the trip computer when it rains, sometimes). It's not even close to being knackered. It could probably do another 115k miles yet. Similar to that, I had a Mondeo ST200 a couple of years ago with 140k or so on the clock. Still went well (once I'd sorted the IMRC), drove straight, no knocks or smoke etc and the aircon worked on that! Little to no service history on it, bought for a grand.
And the most reliable car I've ever owned was a Citroen BX 1.9 diesel. Still (kinda) own it and it's currently showing 203k miles or something like that. The engine is still sweet as a nut to this day. Body is falling off it now though!

Mileage will never put me off a car. I always buy a car on it's merits and nothing else.

Kitchski

6,542 posts

252 months

Saturday 15th October 2011
quotequote all
Negative Creep said:
Kong said:
Kitchski said:
I just don't get the obsession people have with mileage. In 1984, a Maxi with close to 95k miles on it was near the end of it's life.

In 2011, a 150k mile 1999 diesel Golf can handle daily service with little or no drama. The game's moved on. Just like speed limits and stopping distances in the highway code or obsolete almost, but no one has updated those either. Mind you, the standard of driving in this country is so poor it's probably best not to!
I agree mileage isn't the most important thing, however i don't think the game has moved on much at all. Infact i think some manufacturers have got worse - BMW, Merc and Toyota for example, I reckon 20 years ago they were making more reliable engines than they are now.
Interesting you should mention that. Someone on another forum posted some early 1990's scrapyard pictures. The average age of the cars there varied little from what I see today (around 8-10 years)
Doesn't matter how old they are, people will always crash 'em! We'll never know how many were there because they had genuinely 'worn out'.

cornet

1,471 posts

179 months

Saturday 15th October 2011
quotequote all
ambuletz said:
which are the ones that have the 190hp engines? (VVTLi). T-sport, and GT, but what else?
how does it vary with pre-facelift and facelift? its one of those bits that confused me. generally which are the ones to go for?
The 190hp models are:

  • Celica 190
  • T-Sport (Basically the facelift version of the Celica 190)
  • GT
The oil usage issue was only on the 140bhp pre-facelife (pre 03 plate). You can also tell which is the facelift by looking at the front bumper. Google image search will help you with this.



ambuletz

11,492 posts

202 months

Saturday 15th October 2011
quotequote all
Kong said:
I agree mileage isn't the most important thing, however i don't think the game has moved on much at all. Infact i think some manufacturers have got worse - BMW, Merc and Toyota for example, I reckon 20 years ago they were making more reliable engines than they are now.
is it not more a case of people these days being dumb and negligent? I'm sure back in the day people would have taken more care with their cars, treated it more seriously. But now you get some people who forget to even check their tyre pressures, or not have an oil change for several years.

I'm not sure, I'm still abiit wary about cars that go over 100k. especially if they have several owners, as you never know how each owner has treated that car.

How would you maintain a car that's in high miles? I've always liked the idea of buying a car, and owning it for a really long time/clocking up tons of miles on it. (I'm talking owning a car for 20 years, or 300k miles or more)

I was always under the impression that the engine is the most important/expensive thing that could go wrong. 1st prority is check/top up the fluids every month or so. Every 6-12months give it oil/filter changes. 2nd to that, keep timing belts changed according to manufacturers guidelines.

Negative Creep

25,758 posts

248 months

Saturday 15th October 2011
quotequote all
Kitchski said:
Negative Creep said:
Kong said:
Kitchski said:
I just don't get the obsession people have with mileage. In 1984, a Maxi with close to 95k miles on it was near the end of it's life.

In 2011, a 150k mile 1999 diesel Golf can handle daily service with little or no drama. The game's moved on. Just like speed limits and stopping distances in the highway code or obsolete almost, but no one has updated those either. Mind you, the standard of driving in this country is so poor it's probably best not to!
I agree mileage isn't the most important thing, however i don't think the game has moved on much at all. Infact i think some manufacturers have got worse - BMW, Merc and Toyota for example, I reckon 20 years ago they were making more reliable engines than they are now.
Interesting you should mention that. Someone on another forum posted some early 1990's scrapyard pictures. The average age of the cars there varied little from what I see today (around 8-10 years)
Doesn't matter how old they are, people will always crash 'em! We'll never know how many were there because they had genuinely 'worn out'.
True, but you can get a general idea. Whilst components seem to last longer in modern cars, when they go they are expensive and tricky to repair. In the old days it was rust that sent most cars to the bridge of doom; whilst this has been resolved it's now electrics that are the killer