Lorry fuel choice
Author
Discussion

Welshbeef

Original Poster:

49,633 posts

227 months

Tuesday 8th November 2011
quotequote all
Given diesel is not far off £1.40 a ltr and petrol more or less the same yet gas is way way way less than £1 a ltr.

Sure gas is less economical than petrol but why do they not use more gas lorrys?
Surely routes can be made specifically with a gas refuelling enroute or have gas reforming installed at the logistics HQ.


chrisispringles

893 posts

194 months

Tuesday 8th November 2011
quotequote all
I'd have thought it is simply down to torque, that is why lorries switched to it in the first place.

Welshbeef

Original Poster:

49,633 posts

227 months

Tuesday 8th November 2011
quotequote all
chrisispringles said:
I'd have thought it is simply down to torque, that is why lorries switched to it in the first place.
What about te USA they have huge Semi (snigger) rigs 20+ltr petrols plenty of power

davepoth

29,395 posts

228 months

Tuesday 8th November 2011
quotequote all
Welshbeef said:
What about te USA they have huge Semi (snigger) rigs 20+ltr petrols plenty of power
Nope, all diesel. In Canada they do have some LPG trucks now though - they've just finished building the infrastructure. Ford dallied with Gas Turbine trucks back in the day...

P I Staker

3,308 posts

185 months

Tuesday 8th November 2011
quotequote all
Welshbeef said:
What about te USA they have huge Semi (snigger) rigs 20+ltr petrols plenty of power
Do they? confused

zip929

670 posts

206 months

Tuesday 8th November 2011
quotequote all
I drove trucks years ago that were running on Gas (for British Gas surprisingly!).
Fine on the flat but get a hill and they go backwards. No torque at all.
Quiet as hell compared to a Diesel truck. You could hardly hear it running.

Super Slo Mo

5,374 posts

227 months

Tuesday 8th November 2011
quotequote all
davepoth said:
Ford dallied with Gas Turbine trucks back in the day...
Gas Turbine isn't LPG though.

On topic, there have been a few LPG conversions offered here in the UK, from people I know that've tried them, they were utterly gutless, and not really a great deal of use in normal haulage operations.
Of course, the fuel consumption would be nowhere near as good as the diesel equivalents (which are actually very efficient for the power/weight), so the costs worked out very similar, so there was no real discernable advantage.

Mr Happy

5,893 posts

249 months

Tuesday 8th November 2011
quotequote all
Can't diesels be modified to run on propane? Not sure of the cost vs normal derv (or it's suitability given that propane is just a little bit more um... explosive... than diesel fuel!)

BlueMR2

9,464 posts

231 months

Tuesday 8th November 2011
quotequote all
An lpg powered generator and electric in hub motors could provide lots of low down torque, cleaner running in towns and no diesel fumes, no weight from big gearboxes and driveshafts so more room for lpg and longer running times round towns on battery power and brake regeneration to store even more power.

redtwin

7,518 posts

211 months

Tuesday 8th November 2011
quotequote all
Mr Happy said:
Can't diesels be modified to run on propane? Not sure of the cost vs normal derv (or it's suitability given that propane is just a little bit more um... explosive... than diesel fuel!)
They can be fitted with supplemental LPG (improves performance and lower fuel costs), still needs diesel as main source of fuel though.

davepoth

29,395 posts

228 months

Tuesday 8th November 2011
quotequote all
Super Slo Mo said:
davepoth said:
Ford dallied with Gas Turbine trucks back in the day...
Gas Turbine isn't LPG though.
It's just an interesting tidbit really - those were the days when the future was NOW. biggrin

Ozzie Osmond

21,189 posts

275 months

Tuesday 8th November 2011
quotequote all
The fuel tanks would have to be HUGE to carry the same amount of energy as the existing diesel tanks.

Welshbeef

Original Poster:

49,633 posts

227 months

Wednesday 9th November 2011
quotequote all
So lets say a 40 tonne artic.

What would the economy be on average for
Petrol
Diesel

HellDiver

5,708 posts

211 months

Wednesday 9th November 2011
quotequote all
Stobarts have at least one methane gas powered Volvo. Crappy range on it though, so they have to run it on short trips, or flip it over to diesel, which totally negates the point in having it.


v8will

3,310 posts

225 months

Wednesday 9th November 2011
quotequote all
Welshbeef said:
So lets say a 40 tonne artic.

What would the economy be on average for
Petrol
Diesel
Around 11.5mpg would be considered very good for a modern tractor unit with a streamlined trailer. I think some of our older work tractor units (pulling double deckers) struggle to better 9mpg

Can't answer based on petrol.

Welshbeef

Original Poster:

49,633 posts

227 months

Wednesday 9th November 2011
quotequote all
v8will said:
Around 11.5mpg would be considered very good for a modern tractor unit with a streamlined trailer. I think some of our older work tractor units (pulling double deckers) struggle to better 9mpg

Can't answer based on petrol.
Frankly thats very impressive MPG.
Ive heard of some 535d owners struggle to get better than mid 20's yet thats a 1.8 tonne car vs a payload of 40 tonnes ...

v8will

3,310 posts

225 months

Wednesday 9th November 2011
quotequote all
Sorry, didn't think about the weights. 11.5mpg would be running empty. A standard(ish) 580BHP tractor unit @ 44 tonnes gross would probably be around 7mpg.

All figures approximate.

GC8

19,910 posts

219 months

Wednesday 9th November 2011
quotequote all
Ive seen 7mpg laden with 280bhp and 26t. 4mpg-5mpg isnt unheard of.

truck71

2,328 posts

201 months

Wednesday 9th November 2011
quotequote all
Ok

5 axle artic running at 40t trunk routes should achieve high 9's/ early 10's mpg depending on the vehicle spec.

Some HGV's can be converted to run as dual fuel, CNG/LNG + derv.
In a nutshell the vehicle runs on derv at start up, as it warms up to operating temperature the diesel is gradually substituted with the gas until you get to a maximum ratio of 60/40 gas/derv.

Advantges are gas is much cheaper than derv and is cleaner. Disadvantages are investment in infrastructure/conversion kit costs are high with a payback time beyond what some business's see as acceptable.

Risk is the price differential between derv and gas reducing. It is the next natural step for road transport efficieny, mainland europe already adopted to a far greater degree than uk.

philmots

4,666 posts

289 months

Wednesday 9th November 2011
quotequote all
I took a load from Leeds to Alnwick, circa 130 miles. Cruise control set at 80kph in a 60 plate Volvo 13 litre 460hp with about 80000km's on it. There and back, although not much urban use it averaged 12.1mpg. That's very impressive.

Edit to say I was probably running around 30-35 tonne.

Edited by philmots on Wednesday 9th November 16:06