Cheap, Fast and Reliable... let’s see what we are running
Poll: Cheap, Fast and Reliable... let’s see what we are running
Total Members Polled: 196
Discussion
A car which is Cheap, Fast and Reliable is the PHers Holy Grail 
We all search for that magic answer, but I’m not convinced it exists.
I fear most of us end up having to choose two.
Some get lumbered with just one.
I’m sure there are horror stories of those who ended up with none...
So, vote on the poll and we’ll see what choices the PH collective is running. I’ve made the poll multiple choice so those running a fleet can click what they have.

We all search for that magic answer, but I’m not convinced it exists.
I fear most of us end up having to choose two.
Some get lumbered with just one.
I’m sure there are horror stories of those who ended up with none...
So, vote on the poll and we’ll see what choices the PH collective is running. I’ve made the poll multiple choice so those running a fleet can click what they have.
Interesting. Going purely by what I've seen/heard/read, I'd suggest an X300 XJR.
Reliable? Seems so. Always did well in the various driver/owner surveys over the years, and held in high regards on here.
Cheap? Pick 'em up for peanuts. Seems people don't want old, big Jaguars. The £5K smoker thread is a good place for this!
Fast? No slouch!
Other suggestions:
Volvo 850 T5?
Reliable? Seems so. Always did well in the various driver/owner surveys over the years, and held in high regards on here.
Cheap? Pick 'em up for peanuts. Seems people don't want old, big Jaguars. The £5K smoker thread is a good place for this!
Fast? No slouch!
Other suggestions:
Volvo 850 T5?
B3njamin said:
Fast is a bit subjective so to be safe I voted the mx5 as slow but cheap and reliable... I feel it's a bit silly to call it slow but it lags behind most of the quicker cars, although in fairness it is a lot cheaper and even the mk1 is very reliable ~20 years on.
Cheap, Slow, Reliable - having owned one, I consider your vote to be well-judged.A car can't really be classed as 'fast' when you get blasted off from the lights by a MILF in a 4x4 eating an apple

Surely it's too subjective to have much meaning?
One man's fast is another's slow, same with cheap and reliable...
Also, cheap and fast in what respects? Cheap to buy? Insure? Run? All of these? Sub 6 second 0-60 or blessed with 200+ MPH top speed and sub 3 seconds 0-60?
My car's in the middle really - Cheap (by my standards) to buy and run (except the fuel), quickish (not fast by today's standards, but quick enough to keep up with all but the most outlandish hot hatches) and (touch wood) reliable to date (although I've changed coils and plugs).
I couldn't really find a poll option to suit...
M.
One man's fast is another's slow, same with cheap and reliable...
Also, cheap and fast in what respects? Cheap to buy? Insure? Run? All of these? Sub 6 second 0-60 or blessed with 200+ MPH top speed and sub 3 seconds 0-60?
My car's in the middle really - Cheap (by my standards) to buy and run (except the fuel), quickish (not fast by today's standards, but quick enough to keep up with all but the most outlandish hot hatches) and (touch wood) reliable to date (although I've changed coils and plugs).
I couldn't really find a poll option to suit...
M.
marcosgt said:
Surely it's too subjective to have much meaning?
Oh I agree, it's totally subjective. But I still think that whilst it's a target most PHers aim for, most in their heart of heart's know they only got two out of three. At best..
When I wanted a car for hooning and track days I got a Caterham:
Cheap - not sure. Good price for the performance, but it's a Caterham so you have to pay more than the competitors. And when I actually look at what my £13k bought me, there is not a huge amount of 15 year old car to look at...
Fast - yes I think so. 175bhp in 550kgs accelerates/corners/brakes like few others.
Reliable - not sure about this either. It's a rather highly strung motor which has already had some mild engine work to replace blown manifold gaskets. And I often drive listening out for clonks and wondering why there is a rattle at idle unless I depressed the clutch.. Can I run it like a white-goods new Toyota? I very much doubt it.
Edited by Matt UK on Saturday 12th November 23:35
Cock Womble 7 said:
Cheap? Yes. Purchase price, based on what it's capable of, was a complete bargain. It's surprisingly economical and parts are affordable if you shop around.
Fast? Well, more "quick" than "fast", but yes.
Reliable? Touch wood, apart from a fuel pump issue, no problems yet.
I would say it was fast, it must be sub 5 to 60. Fast? Well, more "quick" than "fast", but yes.
Reliable? Touch wood, apart from a fuel pump issue, no problems yet.
Your only trade off I imagine is warmth this time of year.
Not sure whether to consider my FTO fast or not (0-60 in 6.8 or so)? It is to me, and is a fair bit quicker than anything my friends drive (or the "average" car on the road), but then they do favour Yaris's (sp?) and the like.
It is however faultlessly reliable, currently on well over 100,000 miles and really had no issues to speak of at all.
It's also dirt cheap to buy, ok fuel economy (30mpg if you're careful) and cheap enough for parts. Insurance is horrible though for such a cheapy car, downside of being an import
So I voted in 2 categories because I'm indecisive
It is however faultlessly reliable, currently on well over 100,000 miles and really had no issues to speak of at all.
It's also dirt cheap to buy, ok fuel economy (30mpg if you're careful) and cheap enough for parts. Insurance is horrible though for such a cheapy car, downside of being an import

So I voted in 2 categories because I'm indecisive

I suppose you could factor insurance and running costs into this when you consider what is cheap to buy. I wouldnt expect an FTO to be a cheap car to run and maintain if older jap cars are anything to go by. Consider my old Celica which cost me a small fortune - 300 quid for a lower front steering arm anyone..
Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff


