Is this an all synchro gearbox?
Is this an all synchro gearbox?
Author
Discussion

AFC1886

Original Poster:

3,520 posts

172 months

Friday 16th December 2011
quotequote all
The initial message was deleted from this topic on 14 January 2013 at 20:21

davepoth

29,395 posts

221 months

Friday 16th December 2011
quotequote all
Is that a straight cut first? If it is then it's probably not all synchro.

anonymous-user

76 months

Friday 16th December 2011
quotequote all
Bit tricky to tell from that pic with the selector bauks in neutral. Move one the the selector bauks into gear and see if there are brass syncro rings between it and the dog rings!


they are the thin brass knobbly parts in this pic:



(From you pic i'd say none syncro BTW)

Scuffers

20,887 posts

296 months

Saturday 17th December 2011
quotequote all
davepoth said:
Is that a straight cut first? If it is then it's probably not all synchro.
being straight cut or not is irrelevant to if it's synchro or dog engagement.

theconrodkid

372 posts

282 months

Saturday 17th December 2011
quotequote all
looks like a ford type 9,4 synchro,the brass bits are baulk rings and it,s only reverse that is straight cut.
looks like something is missing at the rear of the mainshaft

Crease

583 posts

191 months

Saturday 17th December 2011
quotequote all
ok, shoot me down in flames here, but having never really 'explored' inside a gearbox

why is the inside red? is it to do with the gearbox oil? and if so, then why arnt the gears the same colour?

confused

pitstopete69

98 posts

256 months

Saturday 17th December 2011
quotequote all
thats not an all syncro jag box, just a std moss one.
its in 2nd in the pic.

oops, edit that. its neutral.

the one I have just rebuilt was also painted that colour. usually to seal the casting I dare say. was bits of paint everywhere in the geartrain, over the 40 years it comes off in the corners, bits of sand and casting flash float about and shag the syncros/bearings. was a mess.

Edited by pitstopete69 on Saturday 17th December 11:24


Edited by pitstopete69 on Saturday 17th December 11:26

davepoth

29,395 posts

221 months

Saturday 17th December 2011
quotequote all
Scuffers said:
davepoth said:
Is that a straight cut first? If it is then it's probably not all synchro.
being straight cut or not is irrelevant to if it's synchro or dog engagement.
Well no, but having three helical gears and one straight cut does rather suggest that the first gear is expected to be crunched a little.

Crease

583 posts

191 months

Saturday 17th December 2011
quotequote all
pitstopete69 said:
thats not an all syncro jag box, just a std moss one.
its in 2nd in the pic.

oops, edit that. its neutral.

the one I have just rebuilt was also painted that colour. usually to seal the casting I dare say. was bits of paint everywhere in the geartrain, over the 40 years it comes off in the corners, bits of sand and casting flash float about and shag the syncros/bearings. was a mess.

Edited by pitstopete69 on Saturday 17th December 11:24


Edited by pitstopete69 on Saturday 17th December 11:26
to seal it from what exactly? the oil it contains?

Scuffers

20,887 posts

296 months

Saturday 17th December 2011
quotequote all
davepoth said:
Scuffers said:
davepoth said:
Is that a straight cut first? If it is then it's probably not all synchro.
being straight cut or not is irrelevant to if it's synchro or dog engagement.
Well no, but having three helical gears and one straight cut does rather suggest that the first gear is expected to be crunched a little.
like I said, makes no odds if the gears are straight cut or helical, that's not what defines the engagement.

if it crunches into gear your not listening to the gears, but the method of engagement, be it Synchro, dog, sliding gear, etc.

from the pic of that box (and it's not one I am familiar with) it's a 4 speed where 4th is straight though, so yes there are only 3 pairs of forward gears, the spur gear looks like reverse