Top rear brake light - MOT failure?
Top rear brake light - MOT failure?
Author
Discussion

CIS121

Original Poster:

1,273 posts

236 months

Tuesday 24th January 2012
quotequote all
Mine hasn't worked for years and garages have always said it doesn't need to. I've moved and am taking it to a new garage and they say it does need to work. the testing manual says:

"Additional Stop Lamps Fitted. Any additional stop lamps fitted and connected must be tested. Where extra lamps are fitted and there is doubt as to whether they are connected, the benefit of this doubt should be given to the presenter."

It's a factory fit item. Any MOT testers out there to advise on this?

matthias73

2,900 posts

173 months

Tuesday 24th January 2012
quotequote all
remove the fker

McSam

6,753 posts

198 months

Tuesday 24th January 2012
quotequote all
Well, as the manual says - if it's there and connected, it must work. If it's disconnected, it doesn't have to work because it doesn't then imply a fault in the brake light circuit. Because the manual also says you get benefit of the doubt when it's unclear, if you tell them it's not connected, then it shouldn't matter wink

Dr Interceptor

8,182 posts

219 months

Tuesday 24th January 2012
quotequote all
It's an MOT Fail. Any fitted brake lights must function correctly. Two out of three does not a pass make.

MX7

7,902 posts

197 months

Tuesday 24th January 2012
quotequote all
How about replacing the bulb?!

jagnet

4,373 posts

225 months

Tuesday 24th January 2012
quotequote all
Dr Interceptor said:
It's an MOT Fail. Any fitted brake lights must function correctly. Two out of three does not a pass make.
But the MOT manual doesn't state that.

MOT Manual said:
Vehicles first used on or after 1 January 1971 must be fitted with two obligatory stop lamps.

Additional stop lamps fitted and connected must be tested. Where extra lamps are fitted and there is doubt as to whether they are connected, the benefit of this doubt should be given to the presenter.
So if you tell the MOT tester that the additional high level lamp is not connected then they must give you the benefit of the doubt and pass it. They can't start stripping interior trim out, chasing wires and testing circuits to prove that it is connected.

steve_bmw

1,591 posts

198 months

Tuesday 24th January 2012
quotequote all
Dr Interceptor said:
It's an MOT Fail. Any fitted brake lights must function correctly. Two out of three does not a pass make.
the led middle brake light on my z4 was broken and it still passed. So long as the 2 outer/normal ones work its fine.

Thats what the tester told me anyway!

I didnt argue smile

Edited by steve_bmw on Tuesday 24th January 16:43

Clivew

348 posts

198 months

Tuesday 24th January 2012
quotequote all
steve_bmw said:
the led middle brake light on my z4 was broken and it still passed. So long as the 2 outer/normal ones work its fine.

Thats what the tester told me anyway!

I didnt argue smile

Edited by steve_bmw on Tuesday 24th January 16:43
When was your test?

Andyjc86

1,149 posts

172 months

Tuesday 24th January 2012
quotequote all
Unless you can prove all the wiring is connected, then you have to give the benefit of doubt. As you are not aloud to remove anything for an MOT then you have to pass it. As long as the 2 side ones work then it's a pass

GC8

19,910 posts

213 months

Tuesday 24th January 2012
quotequote all
Dr Interceptor said:
It's an MOT Fail. Any fitted brake lights must function correctly. Two out of three does not a pass make.
This nonsense never dies because people who dont know what theyre talking about perpetuate it in pubs, and now on internet forums.

Stop it.

Dr Interceptor

8,182 posts

219 months

Tuesday 24th January 2012
quotequote all
GC8 said:
This nonsense never dies because people who dont know what theyre talking about perpetuate it in pubs, and now on internet forums.

Stop it.
If it's not a fail, it bloody well should be. 3rd high level brake lights are there for a reason. People who drive badly maintained cars on the road annoy me almost as much as those who speed past schools.

Jimmyarm

1,962 posts

201 months

Tuesday 24th January 2012
quotequote all
GC8 said:
This nonsense never dies because people who dont know what theyre talking about perpetuate it in pubs, and now on internet forums.

Stop it.
It's not strictly nonsense though.

If it's obviously a factory fit high level brake light then unless the presenter advises that they have disconnected it for some bizarre reason the tester should fail it on the basis that it came out of the factory connected.

Chainging the bulb or fixing the snapped wire in the hinge is not that much of a hardship.



GC8

19,910 posts

213 months

Tuesday 24th January 2012
quotequote all
Dr Interceptor said:
If it's not a fail, it bloody well should be. 3rd high level brake lights are there for a reason. People who drive badly maintained cars on the road annoy me almost as much as those who speed past schools.
Perhaps so, but we're talking about the strict rules, rather than how it should be.

GC8

19,910 posts

213 months

Tuesday 24th January 2012
quotequote all
Jimmyarm said:
GC8 said:
This nonsense never dies because people who dont know what theyre talking about perpetuate it in pubs, and now on internet forums.

Stop it.
It's not strictly nonsense though.

If it's obviously a factory fit high level brake light then unless the presenter advises that they have disconnected it for some bizarre reason the tester should fail it on the basis that it came out of the factory connected.

Chainging the bulb or fixing the snapped wire in the hinge is not that much of a hardship.
All true, but strictly what Ive said is correct. Also: the poster was repeating the 'if its fitted it must work' myth; usually trotted out for front fogs, driving lamps as well as retro-fit 3rd brake lights, which is rubbish.

Dr Interceptor

8,182 posts

219 months

Tuesday 24th January 2012
quotequote all
To be honest, I wouldn't be surprised if some testers refuse to pass a car without it functional - regardless of what the rules say.

My brother in law is a main dealer MOT tester, will see what he says when I next see him.

masermartin

1,649 posts

200 months

Tuesday 24th January 2012
quotequote all
GC8 said:
Perhaps so, but we're talking about the strict rules, rather than how it should be.
Arguably you're encouraging someone to perpetuate an unsafe scenario on the grounds of "well technically I'm in the right" instead of just fixing the thing and not having to bother with the question in the first place. wink

Jimmyarm

1,962 posts

201 months

Tuesday 24th January 2012
quotequote all
Agree on the 'fitted must work' bit but on this example if it's an obviously factory fitted item then why would the tester think it was disconnected ?

Unless you can see the connector off or the presenter tells you it's disconnected then you would assume that it is. There is no 'doubt' as it's a standard fitted item.

Retro fit ones are a different kettle of fish obviously but few and far between now ime.


jagracer

8,248 posts

259 months

Tuesday 24th January 2012
quotequote all
Dr Interceptor said:
To be honest, I wouldn't be surprised if some testers refuse to pass a car without it functional - regardless of what the rules say.

My brother in law is a main dealer MOT tester, will see what he says when I next see him.
They can't refuse to pass something just because they don't agree with the rules.

mcford

819 posts

197 months

Tuesday 24th January 2012
quotequote all
A VOSA Vehicle Examiner asked me the same question, I replied with the doubt as to whether it is connected answer and was told that if it is a standard factory fit across the model range, then it must work.

GC8

19,910 posts

213 months

Tuesday 24th January 2012
quotequote all
Ive received contradictory advice from VOSA about MOT validity re V23 / VICs.