Why does an insurer want to do a Credit Check
Discussion
As title really
Any insurance guru's in?
Why is that when I speak to a broker, they ask permission to do a credit check on me? This is just asking for a quote, not asking about ways to pay. FFS, I only want a car insurance quote, not a loan/overdraft/mortgage
Is this about pre-empting ways to pay, or is there something more sinister going on, like bad credit = higher risk?
Huh?
Bowler said:
As title really
Any insurance guru's in?
Why is that when I speak to a broker, they ask permission to do a credit check on me? This is just asking for a quote, not asking about ways to pay. FFS, I only want a car insurance quote, not a loan/overdraft/mortgage
Is this about pre-empting ways to pay, or is there something more sinister going on, like bad credit = higher risk?
Huh?
Probably to assess the risk of deferred payment. Any insurance guru's in?
Why is that when I speak to a broker, they ask permission to do a credit check on me? This is just asking for a quote, not asking about ways to pay. FFS, I only want a car insurance quote, not a loan/overdraft/mortgage
Is this about pre-empting ways to pay, or is there something more sinister going on, like bad credit = higher risk?
Huh?
It is a very basic test which also confirms whether you are registered at the postcode you are using.
IMO this is a perfectly reasonable request by a responsible company.
I see no ulterior motive only reasonable prudence in business.
But then I am a retired Chartered Accountant. Pretty risk averse!
Steffan said:
Probably to assess the risk of deferred payment.
It is a very basic test which also confirms whether you are registered at the postcode you are using.
IMO this is a perfectly reasonable request by a responsible company.
I see no ulterior motive only reasonable prudence in business.
But then I am a retired Chartered Accountant. Pretty risk averse!
Deferred payment risk ought to be assessed at the point where deferred payment premiums are being calculated.It is a very basic test which also confirms whether you are registered at the postcode you are using.
IMO this is a perfectly reasonable request by a responsible company.
I see no ulterior motive only reasonable prudence in business.
But then I am a retired Chartered Accountant. Pretty risk averse!
Identity verification is a separate service available from the likes of Experian, and DO NOT leave a makr on your credit record (unlike a credit check).
Not a reasonable request, IMHO, but will save a couple of quid for the company. I'd therefore be minded to agree with the "no ulterior motive" part, and replace it with ignorance.
randlemarcus said:
Deferred payment risk ought to be assessed at the point where deferred payment premiums are being calculated.
Identity verification is a separate service available from the likes of Experian, and DO NOT leave a makr on your credit record (unlike a credit check).
Not a reasonable request, IMHO, but will save a couple of quid for the company. I'd therefore be minded to agree with the "no ulterior motive" part, and replace it with ignorance.
Agreed. I worked for a price comparison site and it isn't well know that many of the insurance companies they use will do a basic credit check for a quote. However this isn't the worst thing, they will do the same when the comparison site does this again a year, 2 years, 3 years later for their CRM email. Identity verification is a separate service available from the likes of Experian, and DO NOT leave a makr on your credit record (unlike a credit check).
Not a reasonable request, IMHO, but will save a couple of quid for the company. I'd therefore be minded to agree with the "no ulterior motive" part, and replace it with ignorance.
I didn't believe this so checked whether it was the case personally.
randlemarcus said:
.
Identity verification is a separate service available from the likes of Experian, and DO NOT leave a makr on your credit record (unlike a credit check).
Steffan, from my time in the industry there was some reluctance to use this amongst insurers and various agreements in place so they did not use this service.Identity verification is a separate service available from the likes of Experian, and DO NOT leave a makr on your credit record (unlike a credit check).
It was worth more to have the information that a customer had done many quotes of used a comparison site than the cost of a full check. Therefore an agreement on full checks. The background to this is that insurance companies lose money on a customer in the first year - therefore dislike customers who "churn" which comparison sites encourage.
I can honestly see someone's credit rating effecting the price of insurance (and do tens of times a day)
I've always assumed someone with a very poor credit rating (unable to obtain credit of any sort), insuring a £5000 car (inherited, say), that all of a sudden needed £4000 for an unseen bill, would be much more likely to have their car disappear, than average joe.
I'd also think this holds ground, too. I have no problems with it (albeit I have a far less than perfect history). I'm aware that with certain providers I'd pay more than Richard Branson (should he live at my address and insure my car etc).
Just one of those things.
I've always assumed someone with a very poor credit rating (unable to obtain credit of any sort), insuring a £5000 car (inherited, say), that all of a sudden needed £4000 for an unseen bill, would be much more likely to have their car disappear, than average joe.
I'd also think this holds ground, too. I have no problems with it (albeit I have a far less than perfect history). I'm aware that with certain providers I'd pay more than Richard Branson (should he live at my address and insure my car etc).
Just one of those things.
Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff


