Opinions on these 3 cars..
Opinions on these 3 cars..
Author
Discussion

lawrence567

Original Poster:

7,507 posts

211 months

Tuesday 3rd April 2012
quotequote all
PH'ers,

Long have i been searching for a car i actually 'want' as opposed to one to do just a job.
I've had 2 cars since passing my test a couple of years ago (although i am 25) i had motorbikes etc, hence never learning to drive.
My first car was a Punto, my second & current one a 1.6 04 Scenic, so as you can see, my car history is ste.
Having 2 years NCB limits me somewhat & my only real stipulation was i wanted something smaller than the Scenic, but it had to be 'warm' (by my comparisons to what car's i've already had) & that it has 5 seats.
I don't have a massive amount of £££ to spend & have been forever searching for something i just 'like'!
Civic Type R & Mazada 3 MPS & Focus ST were top of my list but due to the fact the CTR has 4 seats & the insurance costs for all 3 are too high has written those off, so i've gone for their 'little brothers'

Honda Civic Type S 2.0L V-Tec-05 plate,58,000 miles, 37MPG combined, £215 tax, £4295 purchase price.

Pro's-Nice spec with half leathers, Honda reliability.
Cons-It's perceived as the poor mans 'R'

Mazda 3 2.0L Sport- 05 plate, 58,000 miles, 34MPG combined, £250 tax, £4250 purchase price.

Pro's - Nice spec & interior, Boase sound system etc, chain as opposed to belt.

Cons-Mazda's just seem like you get a lot of car for the money? Is there a reason for this a nobody i know has any experiences of Mazda.

Ford Fiesta ST-05 plate, 58,000 miles, 38MPG combined, £215 tax, £4495 purchase price.

Pro's - On paper it's the fastest, half leathers, best MPG.
Cons - It only has 3 doors & is belt as opposed to chain, slightly higher insurance

All are around the same money to insure & tax, return similar MPG & going via online reviews all seem to have pretty decent reviews.
I like them all equally, they'd more than likely be bought from a dealer as those are the prices i'm working on!
I'm however looking at a PH point of view, do you own any of the above, have experiences of any of the above & can you recommend any of the above!

martin84

5,366 posts

174 months

Tuesday 3rd April 2012
quotequote all
Well for starters the Fiesta ST will not do 38mpg unless you drive it like a bog standard 1.2 Fiesta, rather defeating the object.

Secondly, dont be put off by the belt driven engine. Plenty of people think 'chain driven' makes it super dooper reliable and flawless in every way, where as belt driven is like trusting your Mrs' knickers to power your engine but its all bks frankly.

DanDC5

19,719 posts

188 months

Tuesday 3rd April 2012
quotequote all
Out of those 3 I'd actually say the Fiesta. Does everything you need it to and can be fun when you're on your own.

martin84

5,366 posts

174 months

Tuesday 3rd April 2012
quotequote all
A hot Ford will always be quite easy to sell on too, where as a poor mans fast Honda probably won't be. Theres always demand for a fast Ford.

lawrence567

Original Poster:

7,507 posts

211 months

Tuesday 3rd April 2012
quotequote all
Would i be right in thinking though that at circa 60,000 miles the ford would be coming up for a belt change which is potentially going to be a few hundred quid?

swifthobo

869 posts

191 months

Tuesday 3rd April 2012
quotequote all
haha cannot believe the fiesta is the fastest out of them and I would go mazda.

martin84

5,366 posts

174 months

Tuesday 3rd April 2012
quotequote all
lawrence567 said:
Would i be right in thinking though that at circa 60,000 miles the ford would be coming up for a belt change which is potentially going to be a few hundred quid?
It probably had one after 3 years anyway but its worth checking out.

duckson

1,294 posts

203 months

Tuesday 3rd April 2012
quotequote all
Have you tried the likes of Greenlight for insurance quotes on the Focus ST?

66comanche

2,369 posts

180 months

Tuesday 3rd April 2012
quotequote all
Fiesta from those but have you had a look at the Focus ST170?

lawrence567

Original Poster:

7,507 posts

211 months

Tuesday 3rd April 2012
quotequote all
66comanche said:
Fiesta from those but have you had a look at the Focus ST170?
I have-i'd prfer the newer shaped one, sadly, the insurance is over £1000 for it though & i don't have the funds to be able to purchase one in the first place!

Decky_Q

1,898 posts

198 months

Tuesday 3rd April 2012
quotequote all
Definitely the Mazda, Ive driven all 3 and out of them the 3mps was the best drive and had really good equiptmemt without having to splurge on the options list imo. Bose stereo is nice too

ETA: didnt notice its not the 3MPS your going for so probably the focus for cheap parts and ease of maintainence.

Edited by Decky_Q on Tuesday 3rd April 17:04

LuS1fer

43,081 posts

266 months

Tuesday 3rd April 2012
quotequote all
I've had a Mazda 5 and while it's a very very good MPV, the engine (1.8) wasn't very exciting or aural though I've no experience of the 2.0

I like the Fiesta as it has a heated front screen but again the 2.0 engine which is also fitted to my 09 Mondeo, is a little unpersonable in the character/aural nature which may have contributed to it's perception as being a bit bland.

Can't comment on the Type S as I've only had the R on which the gearchange was sublime. Bit under-specced and basic in R form but I loved the engine. Assuming the S has the same shift and 8000rpm redline, I'd be calling there first but I think you need to drive all 3.

veevee

1,458 posts

172 months

Tuesday 3rd April 2012
quotequote all
Clio 182 > Fiesta ST, in pretty much every way.

BMW 318 might also be in range? Think group 12 insurance?

fozzymandeus

1,077 posts

167 months

Tuesday 3rd April 2012
quotequote all
I passed my test after uni, so I was in a similar situation to the OP.

I opted for a BMW 316i and I LOVED it. It drove me 70,000 happy miles without any issues. It was "slow" (not actually that slow, but no performance car), but it drove so smoothly and had such good handling for what it was that I just loved it.

As a result, I have a soft spot for a bottom of the range beemer to this day.

Edited by fozzymandeus on Tuesday 3rd April 17:37

lawrence567

Original Poster:

7,507 posts

211 months

Tuesday 3rd April 2012
quotequote all
Beemers had crossed my mind, but a friend of mine just got himself a 318 coupe & he said he rues the day when he did'nt get the 6 pot (coming from a 182) he's regretted it ever since, i'm trying to steer clear of the BMW route as i feel they're extremely bland!
Drive wise which would be better of the mazda 3/Type S/ST?
90% of driving is town, DC & fast A-roads/ very rarely do i venture to the M-Way!

lawrence567

Original Poster:

7,507 posts

211 months

Wednesday 4th April 2012
quotequote all
Shameless bump for he morning crew..

300bhp/ton

41,030 posts

211 months

Wednesday 4th April 2012
quotequote all
lawrence567 said:
PH'ers,

Long have i been searching for a car i actually 'want' as opposed to one to do just a job.
I've had 2 cars since passing my test a couple of years ago (although i am 25) i had motorbikes etc, hence never learning to drive.
My first car was a Punto, my second & current one a 1.6 04 Scenic, so as you can see, my car history is ste.
Having 2 years NCB limits me somewhat & my only real stipulation was i wanted something smaller than the Scenic, but it had to be 'warm' (by my comparisons to what car's i've already had) & that it has 5 seats.
I don't have a massive amount of £££ to spend & have been forever searching for something i just 'like'!
Civic Type R & Mazada 3 MPS & Focus ST were top of my list but due to the fact the CTR has 4 seats & the insurance costs for all 3 are too high has written those off, so i've gone for their 'little brothers'

Honda Civic Type S 2.0L V-Tec-05 plate,58,000 miles, 37MPG combined, £215 tax, £4295 purchase price.

Pro's-Nice spec with half leathers, Honda reliability.
Cons-It's perceived as the poor mans 'R'

Mazda 3 2.0L Sport- 05 plate, 58,000 miles, 34MPG combined, £250 tax, £4250 purchase price.

Pro's - Nice spec & interior, Boase sound system etc, chain as opposed to belt.

Cons-Mazda's just seem like you get a lot of car for the money? Is there a reason for this a nobody i know has any experiences of Mazda.

Ford Fiesta ST-05 plate, 58,000 miles, 38MPG combined, £215 tax, £4495 purchase price.

Pro's - On paper it's the fastest, half leathers, best MPG.
Cons - It only has 3 doors & is belt as opposed to chain, slightly higher insurance

All are around the same money to insure & tax, return similar MPG & going via online reviews all seem to have pretty decent reviews.
I like them all equally, they'd more than likely be bought from a dealer as those are the prices i'm working on!
I'm however looking at a PH point of view, do you own any of the above, have experiences of any of the above & can you recommend any of the above!
Just curious, you start by talking about finding a car you really "want". Do you really want a normal hatchback?

I'm not trying to be funny, but the prime reason for a hatchback is it's packaging as a good family or city car. Ok there are some fast and fun models, but they are usually the exception and still have a compromised design.

So my question is, do you really need a family car like a Civic or Mazda 3 or a compact family car/city car like a Fiesta?

There are so many great cars out there, but I don't see any of these as "want" cars, just a compromise as you wanted something else but needed the practicality.

lawrence567

Original Poster:

7,507 posts

211 months

Wednesday 4th April 2012
quotequote all
300bhp/ton said:
Just curious, you start by talking about finding a car you really "want". Do you really want a normal hatchback?

I'm not trying to be funny, but the prime reason for a hatchback is it's packaging as a good family or city car. Ok there are some fast and fun models, but they are usually the exception and still have a compromised design.

So my question is, do you really need a family car like a Civic or Mazda 3 or a compact family car/city car like a Fiesta?

There are so many great cars out there, but I don't see any of these as "want" cars, just a compromise as you wanted something else but needed the practicality.
I have an 18 month old, who i pick up on weekends, i also work weekends which means i have to lug turntables etc about & i also give friends a lift so a 5 seater is a must, if not my choice would be a whole lot easier, unfortunately i have to take into account a little bit of practicality, coupled with purchase cost + insurance & what i 'like' brings me to the 3 choices above!

300bhp/ton

41,030 posts

211 months

Wednesday 4th April 2012
quotequote all
lawrence567 said:
I have an 18 month old, who i pick up on weekends, i also work weekends which means i have to lug turntables etc about & i also give friends a lift so a 5 seater is a must, if not my choice would be a whole lot easier, unfortunately i have to take into account a little bit of practicality, coupled with purchase cost + insurance & what i 'like' brings me to the 3 choices above!
Nah that's cool. Just thought I'd ask as so many don't. smile

Guess it comes down to what you want. The Fiesta will likely be the most fun, but there's a trade off in size compared to the others.

But I guess it comes down to what you are after, if you want pace and don't mind compromising space then maybe a coupe of some kind mind be an option (Celica) as they can still be quite practical.

There's also bigger cars like X-Types and Audi A6's that could offer better hauling ability and in some case still not a bad drive.

excel monkey

4,633 posts

248 months

Wednesday 4th April 2012
quotequote all
lawrence567 said:
Honda Civic Type S 2.0L V-Tec-05 plate,58,000 miles, 37MPG combined, £215 tax, £4295 purchase price.

Pro's-Nice spec with half leathers, Honda reliability.
Cons-It's perceived as the poor mans 'R'
The EP3 Type S is an excellent choice. Never mind the "poor mans Type R" image - it's still reasonably quick with 160bhp, and the reliability and practicality are excellent.

Have you considered an MG ZS with the V6 engine? They made them up until 2005. Likely much cheaper than the other '05 cars you are considering. Old chassis, but was highly rated at the time, IIRC.

Or if you don't do many miles and mpg isn't a big deal, how about an RX8??