Ferrari or Hedgehog?
Author
Discussion

mat777

Original Poster:

10,695 posts

181 months

Monday 9th April 2012
quotequote all
Sorry Mr Prickles, but I think I'd have elected to save the car instead:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2126985/Th...

englisharcher

1,607 posts

185 months

Monday 9th April 2012
quotequote all
That hedgehog would be a pancake if I had been driving.

I would only swerve for a badger, and only because I've hit one before at 70, and it made a hell of a mess of my bosses car that I happened to be driving.

AndrewW-G

11,968 posts

238 months

Monday 9th April 2012
quotequote all
If it was a Testarossa or 512TR, it would be save the Ferrari . . . however it was a 512m, so can only be improved with an impromptu front end restyle.

Toaster Pilot

14,824 posts

179 months

Monday 9th April 2012
quotequote all
Well it's different from "diesel on the road" scratchchinhehe

Zoobeef

6,004 posts

179 months

Monday 9th April 2012
quotequote all
Ahh the old hedgehog ran out in front of me excuse

Eighteeteewhy

7,259 posts

189 months

Monday 9th April 2012
quotequote all

Why did the hedgehog cross the road?

no-worries88

1,817 posts

219 months

Monday 9th April 2012
quotequote all
Yep.. i believe him :s

Jasandjules

71,784 posts

250 months

Monday 9th April 2012
quotequote all
Eighteeteewhy said:
Why did the hedgehog cross the road?
To write off the Ferrari?

I'll take evasive action to the extent it's "safe" to do so, done a few hard brakes and a few swerves in my time to avoid killing animals.

neilbauer

2,467 posts

204 months

Monday 9th April 2012
quotequote all
AndrewW-G said:
If it was a Testarossa or 512TR, it would be save the Ferrari . . . however it was a 512m, so can only be improved with an impromptu front end restyle.
I'm curious now, what is the difference between a Testarossa, 512TR and 512M?

B Huey

4,881 posts

220 months

Monday 9th April 2012
quotequote all
neilbauer said:
I'm curious now, what is the difference between a Testarossa, 512TR and 512M?
512M has an ugly front end.

neilbauer

2,467 posts

204 months

Monday 9th April 2012
quotequote all
B Huey said:
neilbauer said:
I'm curious now, what is the difference between a Testarossa, 512TR and 512M?
512M has an ugly front end.
I see thanks smile

AndrewW-G

11,968 posts

238 months

Monday 9th April 2012
quotequote all
neilbauer said:
B Huey said:
neilbauer said:
I'm curious now, what is the difference between a Testarossa, 512TR and 512M?
512M has an ugly front end.
I see thanks smile
Testarossa = first generation

512TR = second generation, with different bumpers, interior, wheels, tweaked motor and a better chassis (considered the best of the bunch)

512M = third generation, with different bumpers, interior, wheels, tweaked motor and a better chassis . . . however it doesn't have pop up lights, having fixed headlights under clear covers, considered the best to drive, but the worst looking

Eighteeteewhy

7,259 posts

189 months

Monday 9th April 2012
quotequote all
Talking about this now on the J.Vine show, radio2.

Mr2Mike

20,143 posts

276 months

Monday 9th April 2012
quotequote all
englisharcher said:
I would only swerve for a badger, and only because I've hit one before at 70,
So you wouldn't bother for foxes, dogs, sheep, cattle, horses etc? biggrin

neilbauer

2,467 posts

204 months

Monday 9th April 2012
quotequote all
AndrewW-G said:
neilbauer said:
B Huey said:
neilbauer said:
I'm curious now, what is the difference between a Testarossa, 512TR and 512M?
512M has an ugly front end.
I see thanks smile
Testarossa = first generation

512TR = second generation, with different bumpers, interior, wheels, tweaked motor and a better chassis (considered the best of the bunch)

512M = third generation, with different bumpers, interior, wheels, tweaked motor and a better chassis . . . however it doesn't have pop up lights, having fixed headlights under clear covers, considered the best to drive, but the worst looking
Thanks for that, just googled all 3 front ends and M is a bit ugly!

Benbay001

5,830 posts

178 months

Monday 9th April 2012
quotequote all
Mr2Mike said:
So you wouldn't bother for foxes, dogs, sheep, cattle, horses etc? biggrin
Not forgetting other people..

mat777

Original Poster:

10,695 posts

181 months

Monday 9th April 2012
quotequote all
Benbay001 said:
Mr2Mike said:
englisharcher said:
I would only swerve for a badger, and only because I've hit one before at 70,
So you wouldn't bother for foxes, dogs, sheep, cattle, horses etc? biggrin
Not forgetting other people..
I believe this was englisharcher driving:



Edited by mat777 on Monday 9th April 22:51

Benbay001

5,830 posts

178 months

Monday 9th April 2012
quotequote all
mat777 said:
I believe this was englisharcher driving:

laugh