In-built Sat-Nav
Author
Discussion

cpas

Original Poster:

1,661 posts

261 months

Monday 9th April 2012
quotequote all
Am I missing something? Why would anybody pay up to £2000 for built-in sat-nav as an option when you can but a Tom Tom or similar for around £100? Also, the Tom Tom can moved between vehicles whereas the built-in unit can't. A colleague had this option on an Avensis which was raidly out of date, and Toyota wanted £300 for a new CD. What's the advantage?

LukeSi

5,780 posts

182 months

Monday 9th April 2012
quotequote all
cpas said:
Am I missing something? Why would anybody pay up to £2000 for built-in sat-nav as an option when you can but a Tom Tom or similar for around £100? Also, the Tom Tom can moved between vehicles whereas the built-in unit can't. A colleague had this option on an Avensis which was raidly out of date, and Toyota wanted £300 for a new CD. What's the advantage?
It is a fixed unit designed to fit with the interior of the car rather than something you stick to the windscreen.

daemon

38,357 posts

218 months

Monday 9th April 2012
quotequote all
cpas said:
Am I missing something? Why would anybody pay up to £2000 for built-in sat-nav as an option when you can but a Tom Tom or similar for around £100? Also, the Tom Tom can moved between vehicles whereas the built-in unit can't. A colleague had this option on an Avensis which was raidly out of date, and Toyota wanted £300 for a new CD. What's the advantage?
On prestige cars not having the factory fit sat nav will impact residuals - though rarely to the value of the sat nav in the first place.

A lot of people prefer the in built nature of the factory fit units - TBH a £100 tom tom stuck on the screen of a new merc just doesnt really cut it.

Also, a lot of the latest in car ones have a hard drive 'infotainment' system as part of it so represent better value.

But really, no there is no justification for the crazy pricing other than 'because they can'

Jimbo.

4,155 posts

210 months

Monday 9th April 2012
quotequote all
One less thing to faff around with., lock away, keep charged etc.
No chance of forgetting it.
Difficult/impossible to steal.
Neatly integrated with the vehicles systems (speakers, controls etc)
Bigger screen

Ari

19,739 posts

236 months

Tuesday 10th April 2012
quotequote all
It's clearly a case of they charge it because they can. Certainly a built in sat nav is far preferable, but I agree, £2,000 vs £100 for a Tom Tom? Madness. And the Tom Tom probably has a nicer interface.

If people laughed at the manufacturers for asking such stupid amounts the prices of inbuilt kit would tumble. But they don't, so they won't.

chris182

4,226 posts

174 months

Tuesday 10th April 2012
quotequote all
I don't get it either. They are hugely overpriced compared to standalone satnavs and in ten years will be completely outdated whereas the rest of the car will be fine.

The only advantage I can see is that they can't be ripped off the windscreen by G forces when cornering hard! (I once bounced mine off the passenger door window while going round a roundabout).

cpas

Original Poster:

1,661 posts

261 months

Tuesday 10th April 2012
quotequote all
Also, the one in the new van at work works through the stereo speakers and completely cut off the stereo sound at every command - very annoying halfway through an 'interesting' bit on the radio!!

gtidriver

3,650 posts

208 months

Tuesday 10th April 2012
quotequote all
If you get a Tom Tom don't leave it in your car on show with the door unlocked.

Jayzee

2,735 posts

225 months

Tuesday 10th April 2012
quotequote all
gtidriver said:
If you get a Tom Tom don't leave it in your car on show with the door unlocked.
hehe

Eggman

1,253 posts

232 months

Tuesday 10th April 2012
quotequote all
cpas said:
Why would anybody pay up to £2000 for built-in sat-nav as an option when you can but a Tom Tom or similar for around £100?
The real comparison, imho, is increasingly with the navigation built into pretty much every modern phone for NOWT!

My phone is very often plugged into its charger when I'm driving because it is such a battery pig due to my excessive data usage. I often find myself using it for navigation in preference to my standalone satnav because if I'm in an unfamiliar town and wish to visit a particular shop it'll take me straight to it with the minimum faffing about and it also has absurdly detailed traffic info and the maps are constantly bang up to date without me needing to lift a finger to update them. The voice directions aren't quite as good, but I can live with that for the purposes I use it for.

Rowan138

230 posts

172 months

Tuesday 10th April 2012
quotequote all
why not make in in-car system based upon a usb solid state drive module or SD card that you can simply plug into a pc and use exported maps from http://www.openstreetmap.org/
also the in car system could be based on linux or something and would have an in car camera built in.

mollymoo

130 posts

167 months

Tuesday 10th April 2012
quotequote all
Bigger screen and better integration. No faffing about charging it and setting it up, no ugly holder on the windscreen, controls on the steering wheel, quietens the stereo to give instructions, nothing to steal etc. The one in our Volvo will even delay voice instructions and phone calls when it thinks you're too busy driving (high-ish g or ESP/TCS cutting in - pretty much whenever it feels the need to tighten the seatbelts).

As a device for getting you where you want to go they aren't typically as good as a TomTom - harder to use, worse routing - and they cost a fortune to buy and update. But they are much, much better toys. Hitting a button on the steering wheel and having a screen pop up out of the dash is approximately six thousand times more satisfying than sticking a wobbly mount to your windscreen and hoping it stays there.

tbc

3,017 posts

196 months

Tuesday 10th April 2012
quotequote all
I like the Audi Navigation built in on an A3,

it's £1500 extra when new from a main dealer

a few mates have picked them up on ebay for £150-300

and the new discs are £500 from a dealer, and about £10 if you know a mate

biggrin

sjg

7,637 posts

286 months

Tuesday 10th April 2012
quotequote all
Jimbo. said:
One less thing to faff around with., lock away, keep charged etc.
No chance of forgetting it.
Difficult/impossible to steal.
Neatly integrated with the vehicles systems (speakers, controls etc)
Bigger screen
This.

I had it in my Civic but only because it was standard for EX spec cars. Extra cost over model below was well under £2k and included all sorts of other kit as well as the nav. Much easier to put in postcodes while driving with the scroll wheel than a tiny touchscreen somewhere up on the dash or windscreen - likewise much easier to scroll around the map to see where it's planning to go. No cables trailing all over the place for power. Big screen was used for stereo, climate, etc as well as navigation.

I like the idea of the Renault system with an integrated Tomtom unit in a suitable place in the dash though - much cheaper than a typical integrated unit, easier/cheaper to update and much better than suction cups and chargers from the lighter socket.

once

200 posts

204 months

Tuesday 10th April 2012
quotequote all
I reckon it'll soon change. At the moment, manufacturers have to make two dashboards - one with sat nav and one without. And that's where the cost comes in.

But more and more cars will get sat nav as standard and then the prices will tumble. It won't take long until satnav is one of those essentials that just about every car has, like electric windows and aircon.

xRIEx

8,180 posts

169 months

Tuesday 10th April 2012
quotequote all
I'll answer your queestion with a question:

Why would anyone want to pay £75K+ on a premium saloon when they could have a Kia or Hyundai for a quarter of the price, does exactly the same job, can exceed the national speed limit, has similar luggage space, yadda yadda yadda?

Because it looks nicer, feels more special, they want it and they can afford it.

Who buys a Hugo Boss suit when M&S do such a lovely range?

busta

4,504 posts

254 months

Tuesday 10th April 2012
quotequote all
What we really need is a hole in the dashboard that accepts a tablet computer. For under £300 you can get a tablet that would carry out all music storage, sat nav and car-phone duties, wouldn't look out of place integrated into the dash and you could take it around with you whenever you want. Simples!

I hope this is the way things are heading because car manufacturers are never going to keep up with technology quick enough to avoid being out-of-date in a year or so. There are hundreds of 7" or 10" tablets that could be integrated into a similar size hole with simple adapters.

sjg

7,637 posts

286 months

Tuesday 10th April 2012
quotequote all
once said:
I reckon it'll soon change. At the moment, manufacturers have to make two dashboards - one with sat nav and one without. And that's where the cost comes in.

But more and more cars will get sat nav as standard and then the prices will tumble. It won't take long until satnav is one of those essentials that just about every car has, like electric windows and aircon.
Much of Audi's new stuff has the screen, the radio has a "nav" button but unless you've paid the extra for the special overpriced SD card with the maps on (tied to your chassis number, of course) then it won't do anything.

Rest of VAG seems to just be designed around huge radios so if you spec nav you get a big colour screen navigation in that place instead.

Neezer

391 posts

249 months

Tuesday 10th April 2012
quotequote all
busta said:
What we really need is a hole in the dashboard that accepts a tablet computer. For under £300 you can get a tablet that would carry out all music storage, sat nav and car-phone duties, wouldn't look out of place integrated into the dash and you could take it around with you whenever you want. Simples!

I hope this is the way things are heading because car manufacturers are never going to keep up with technology quick enough to avoid being out-of-date in a year or so. There are hundreds of 7" or 10" tablets that could be integrated into a similar size hole with simple adapters.
I think Land Rover may have something like that planned for the next Defender.. Due in 2015!!

once

200 posts

204 months

Tuesday 10th April 2012
quotequote all
sjg said:
Much of Audi's new stuff has the screen, the radio has a "nav" button but unless you've paid the extra for the special overpriced SD card with the maps on (tied to your chassis number, of course) then it won't do anything.

Rest of VAG seems to just be designed around huge radios so if you spec nav you get a big colour screen navigation in that place instead.
Until some motor manufacturers start offering sat nav as standard and they are forced to follow suit. Sounds like they are preparing for that already.