Phantom running costs
Author
Discussion

twoblacklines

Original Poster:

1,575 posts

183 months

Tuesday 24th April 2012
quotequote all
Completely pointless thread in terms of real life, but with used Phantoms going for £125k (which isnt too bad really considering the new price) I want to know what sort of running costs these cost to own?

Say you do 5000 miles a year.

I know insurance is group 20 (which isnt much really as a 2.8 vr6 golf worth £2k is group 17) and you get around 10mpg which means for £100 of fuel you get 400 mile range.

Whats the deal with used car warranty, things that break, known problems etc?


Huntsman

9,040 posts

272 months

Tuesday 24th April 2012
quotequote all
twoblacklines said:
Completely pointless thread in terms of real life, but with used Phantoms going for £125k (which isnt too bad really considering the new price) I want to know what sort of running costs these cost to own?

Say you do 5000 miles a year.

I know insurance is group 20 (which isnt much really as a 2.8 vr6 golf worth £2k is group 17) and you get around 10mpg which means for £100 of fuel you get 400 mile range.

Whats the deal with used car warranty, things that break, known problems etc?
Not sure your MPG sums are quite right.

Matt UK

18,080 posts

222 months

Tuesday 24th April 2012
quotequote all
Also, your insurance group comparison could be rather meaningless..

PaperCut

640 posts

169 months

Tuesday 24th April 2012
quotequote all
twoblacklines said:
I know insurance is group 20 (which isnt much really as a 2.8 vr6 golf worth £2k is group 17)
>facepalm<

Biker's Nemesis

40,970 posts

230 months

Tuesday 24th April 2012
quotequote all
twoblacklines said:
Completely pointless thread in terms of real life, but with used Phantoms going for £125k (which isnt too bad really considering the new price) I want to know what sort of running costs these cost to own?

Say you do 5000 miles a year.

I know insurance is group 20 (which isnt much really as a 2.8 vr6 golf worth £2k is group 17) and you get around 10mpg which means for £100 of fuel you get 400 mile range.

Whats the deal with used car warranty, things that break, known problems etc?
£125k on a second hand car and you're asking about MPG and Insurance costs.

Something isn't adding up!

paulrussell

2,291 posts

183 months

Tuesday 24th April 2012
quotequote all
If you have to ask about running costs for a Rolls Royce you can't afford one.

Complex

520 posts

197 months

Tuesday 24th April 2012
quotequote all
If you think "around 10mpg which means for £100 of fuel you get 400 mile range", then you should probably go back to school.

AdamTheTrader

242 posts

167 months

Tuesday 24th April 2012
quotequote all
We get about 15mpg out of ours on average- though my father does drive like a corpse.

I can also tell you that he pays plenty more for his insurance than I do on my RS4 (also insurance 20)

jardinec

392 posts

234 months

Tuesday 24th April 2012
quotequote all
twoblacklines said:
...for £100 of fuel you get 400 mile range.
Made me look twice!

Think its more like 150 miles at £100

TonyHetherington

32,091 posts

272 months

Tuesday 24th April 2012
quotequote all
I had a discussion with a chap only a couple of weeks ago about his Phantom. His had done high miles (compared to others) and he said it was the electrical gremlins that cause the most hassle. Constantly showing warning lights, then going off, that sort of thing. Once out of warranty, repair costs could be high and so a warranty is essential, he suggested.

Oh and I agree - depending on the price you use, £100 of fuel will get you 150 miles or so, certainly not 400 !

longblackcoat

5,047 posts

205 months

Tuesday 24th April 2012
quotequote all
OK, the fuel thing was badly calculated, but the OP's questions are fair enough.

If you were the sort of person who might consider a car at £90-100k, would running a Phantom be any more expensive than anything else in that bracket? Sure, for the original purchaser it was a case of 'if you have to ask...' but for the owner ten years down the line, buying at £70k or so, running costs will be far more of an issue.

To answer the OP's questions: I have no idea, but I suspect that depreciation will continue to be biggest cost (by far) of ownership until a Phantom gets to 15 years old or so, after which a well-maintained one will probably not lose much more. Realistically, that means £50k or so.

Frances The Mute

1,816 posts

263 months

Tuesday 24th April 2012
quotequote all
twoblacklines said:
I know insurance is group 20 (which isnt much really as a 2.8 vr6 golf worth £2k is group 17)
Plenty of cars are group 20 and there's a vast difference between their perceived risk exposure so the premium won't be linear to the Golf.

A ratty E34 M5 that costs a sniff under £4k is group 20. There's no way a G20 policy for a car with a market value of £100k is going to cost anywhere near the same.

TonyHetherington

32,091 posts

272 months

Tuesday 24th April 2012
quotequote all
longblackcoat said:
To answer the OP's questions: I have no idea, but I suspect that depreciation will continue to be biggest cost (by far) of ownership until a Phantom gets to 15 years old or so, after which a well-maintained one will probably not lose much more. Realistically, that means £50k or so.
So far they don't look that bad, depreciation wise, do they?! I see a 2004 with 35k miles for £100k. An 8 year old car worth 40% of it's new price sounds pretty ok to me?

A 2010 with 5k miles for £190k - that's probably a big hit for the new buyer in raw cash terms, but a good used buy I would wager?

Cheib

24,952 posts

197 months

Tuesday 24th April 2012
quotequote all
longblackcoat said:
To answer the OP's questions: I have no idea, but I suspect that depreciation will continue to be biggest cost (by far) of ownership until a Phantom gets to 15 years old or so, after which a well-maintained one will probably not lose much more. Realistically, that means £50k or so.
It'll be interesting to see where these kind of cars bottom out.....I suppose they are much harder for specialists to deal with...you need to be more an electrical engineer than a mechanic! I imagine running costs would be much more than for the previous generation RR's ?

veevee

1,458 posts

173 months

Tuesday 24th April 2012
quotequote all
PaperCut said:
twoblacklines said:
I know insurance is group 20 (which isnt much really as a 2.8 vr6 golf worth £2k is group 17)
>facepalm<

longblackcoat

5,047 posts

205 months

Tuesday 24th April 2012
quotequote all
TonyHetherington said:
longblackcoat said:
To answer the OP's questions: I have no idea, but I suspect that depreciation will continue to be biggest cost (by far) of ownership until a Phantom gets to 15 years old or so, after which a well-maintained one will probably not lose much more. Realistically, that means £50k or so.
So far they don't look that bad, depreciation wise, do they?! I see a 2004 with 35k miles for £100k. An 8 year old car worth 40% of it's new price sounds pretty ok to me?

A 2010 with 5k miles for £190k - that's probably a big hit for the new buyer in raw cash terms, but a good used buy I would wager?
The thing is that big barges like this tend to continue to drop in value, and the fact that they're made in relatively large numbers means that they're never going to be particularly collectable. Using your example of a 2004 car at £100k, if you bought it and used it for 2 years/10k miles I'd be amazed if it didn't cost £30k in depreciation when you came to sell. Probably no worse than buying a top-end Audi in absolute depreciation terms, but then you're comparing the depreciation of a brand-new car to that of a car that's the best part of a decade old, which will have other costs to consider (which the Audi probably wouldn't have - all under warranty).

My estimate of settling at £50k is, I think, a but too generous. I can't see a decent one of these ever going for £10k, but it'll not take too much for them to get into the £20-30k range. We never thought we'd be there with the recent Astons, but look at the 'Trader, and there are any number in this range. OK, this is a much more expensive car, but the running costs will be astronomical. and the number of people for whom this car makes any sense at all are few and far between.

TonyHetherington

32,091 posts

272 months

Tuesday 24th April 2012
quotequote all
Fair point on the Astons - they've got lower than people imagined they would.

I have this theory about used cars that I struggle to put into words, but bare with me. And it's that used cars are highly effected by £1000 snotters.

My theory, I propose, is that there needs to be "room" for upper cars to sit in the price range. Now that £1000 snotters are actually not that bad in terms of "drive around, be reliable-ish", it pushes everything above it up in terms of price.

Thus, I reason that a Phantom would never get as low as £50k purely because there are so many more cars that need to be beneath it.

Does that make any sense at all?! hehe

EDLT

15,421 posts

228 months

Tuesday 24th April 2012
quotequote all
How quickly did the old cars depreciate once the Phantom came out? When the new model appears you won't be able to hide your used car with a private plate wink

sleep envy

62,260 posts

271 months

Tuesday 24th April 2012
quotequote all
TonyHetherington said:
Fair point on the Astons - they've got lower than people imagined they would.

I have this theory about used cars that I struggle to put into words, but bare with me. And it's that used cars are highly effected by £1000 snotters.

My theory, I propose, is that there needs to be "room" for upper cars to sit in the price range. Now that £1000 snotters are actually not that bad in terms of "drive around, be reliable-ish", it pushes everything above it up in terms of price.

Thus, I reason that a Phantom would never get as low as £50k purely because there are so many more cars that need to be beneath it.

Does that make any sense at all?! hehe
Can you please say that to V8mate, it would be interesting to hear your comments on his £10k value theory laugh

valiant

13,100 posts

182 months

Tuesday 24th April 2012
quotequote all
Interesting question.

Ignoring insurance, depreciation and MPG for a moment, how much would RR charge for a service? How much for consumables like brakes,discs,etc. What's RR hourly rate?

There was a thread in the Bentley subforum where an Arnage has a scheduled major service that lasts 18 hours or somesuch. How much was that!

Unlikely ever to be in a position to own one (lottery non withstanding) but ,like the OP, curious.