McLaren factory article in Daily Mail
Discussion
Screw that have you seen this, at least here they get their facts right;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gVGlqjCufMY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gVGlqjCufMY
Only 19?
Git!
I've been taking photo's for hundreds of years (at least it feels like it) & mine never come out anywhere near as good as that.
I, like some others, assumed that Mr W was older that he actually is. If his photos are this good at 19 what are they going to be like when he has some experience???
Fantastic set of photos. Just a shame that the Daily Fail article is so bad!
Git!
I've been taking photo's for hundreds of years (at least it feels like it) & mine never come out anywhere near as good as that.
I, like some others, assumed that Mr W was older that he actually is. If his photos are this good at 19 what are they going to be like when he has some experience???
Fantastic set of photos. Just a shame that the Daily Fail article is so bad!
Chris993C4 said:
Daily Wail article said:
McLaren's first supercar

HTH if you are Firefox user - https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/kit...

FourWheelDrift said:
It's correct, pedantically in the grand scale of things the F1 was a hypercar
I don't think the 'Hypercar' tag even existed when the McLaren appeared. It was a Supercar in the same essence as the XJ220 was a Supercar.And even if it did, it wouldn't be one. The McLaren is a usable Supercar, not a huge overbearing monster.
Fire99 said:
I don't think the 'Hypercar' tag even existed when the McLaren appeared. It was a Supercar in the same essence as the XJ220 was a Supercar.
And even if it did, it wouldn't be one. The McLaren is a usable Supercar, not a huge overbearing monster.
Yes, I thought the 'Hyper Car' tag came about so they could start calling the mass produced and mundane stuff 'Supercars'. And even if it did, it wouldn't be one. The McLaren is a usable Supercar, not a huge overbearing monster.
Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff







). 

