Help me decide.....mx5 or 7
Help me decide.....mx5 or 7
Author
Discussion

noell35

Original Poster:

3,177 posts

175 months

Friday 25th May 2012
quotequote all
First things first. I've always wanted a Caterham 7 since I was a young lad and have been looking on the classifieds for ages. I could afford an £8000ish Caterham but my concern is not having a garage to put it in. Although I have the cash to buy the car I can't really commit to the monthly cost of a lock up to put it in.
Then I started looking at MX-5's around the £1k mark as a bit of a fun summer car which wouldn't be the end of the world if some oik trashed it in the street.
Either would be a second car as I have a V70 estate/barge shed.
Would I regret not getting the 7 (well yes probably!) even if it meant getting no sleep worrying about who was doing what to it in the night? I've read blogs/posts from PHers who have kept 7's without a garage, I suppose it's insured....
Anyways I'm waffling so...thoughts?

Ray Luxury-Yacht

8,918 posts

243 months

Friday 25th May 2012
quotequote all
Driven both.

MX-5 is a great little all-round sports car. Can be used for weekend fun as well as commuting. When driven flat out, it does become a little ragged and soggy. But on a public road, that's probably approaching the limit of what's acceptable anyway.

7's are totally hardcore, making no sense or 'raison d'etre' at anything below flat out. Uncomfortable, cramped, hot (or cold depending on the weather) noisy, vibraty machines. Driven with commitment - bags of feedback, fun and reward. Maybe a little wasted on roads - better sampled to the limit on trackdays. Totally impractical for anything except fun days. Countryside touring or commuting - um, no.

Both cars fairly simple to work on, spares not an issue and fairly cheap.

I'd imagine insurance is similar for both (i.e. not much)

I personally wouldn't entertain keeping a 7 if I didn't have a garage or indoor storage of some description. Not just when it's parked, but for any spannering you may need to do on it.

An MX5 would be happy kept on a driveway or road.

So....depends on usage! Will you be doing trackdays?


noell35

Original Poster:

3,177 posts

175 months

Friday 25th May 2012
quotequote all

So....depends on usage! Will you be doing trackdays?


[/quote]

I wasn't planning on it, perhaps an MX5 and rent a caterham with some of the money 'left over' would be the best option

noell35

Original Poster:

3,177 posts

175 months

Friday 25th May 2012
quotequote all
I must learn how to use quotes properly :-(

Ray Luxury-Yacht

8,918 posts

243 months

Friday 25th May 2012
quotequote all
Well, for what it's worth - no garage and no track days means you'd be better off with an MX5 mate.

Plus, you don't say how handy you are with the spanners - but all the 7 owners i've known have had to spend a fair bit of time tinkering with them - it's the nature of the kit car type of build. There's usually some little thing that needs doing now and again.

All 'in my opinion' of course - hope this helps!


mx5tom

573 posts

200 months

Friday 25th May 2012
quotequote all
I'd say go for the Seven... As you say, you'll be disappointed if you don't. It's a second car, does it need to be very practical? MX5's are great, cheap fun but if your set on a Seven, get a Seven. smile

Personally I wouldn't worry too much about it being outside. I'm sure covers are available... Keep in mind I have absolutely no experience with a Caterham or similar... so take this with a pinch of salt. wink

V8Triumph

5,995 posts

242 months

Friday 25th May 2012
quotequote all
How about something like an MG Midget fitted with a K Series? Bit more weather gear than a 7 and the option of a hard top but still great fun to drive.

noell35

Original Poster:

3,177 posts

175 months

Saturday 26th May 2012
quotequote all
Funnily enough I saw a midget when I was looking at mx5's on ebay and it did cross my mind. I think that would lead to upgrade/renovation costs though as I would become attached to it. The idea with the MX5 was to buy the cheapest possible for a bit of summer fun with little outlay and get rid before the sills disappear! It's been ages since I had a car I enjoy driving, and I love driving. Never had a rwd either (unless a 2wd Ford Ranger counts)so a bit short on PH points all round!

randlemarcus

13,646 posts

258 months

Saturday 26th May 2012
quotequote all
Slightly OT, but considering a V70. Does it have a flat load bay, or is there a boot lip like the V40?

PS I'm going down the MX5 route, then Exoceting it when the tinworm strikes biggrin

trackerjack

649 posts

211 months

Saturday 26th May 2012
quotequote all
Sorry but its a no brainer. The 7 is an animal and unless you are serious about cars step away.

MX5,s can be tuned, transplanted or both. The engine was designed to have a turbo so you can make it as fast as you like.
Plus they are so so cheap.

Hitch78

6,118 posts

221 months

Saturday 26th May 2012
quotequote all
Ray Luxury-Yacht said:
When driven flat out, it does become a little ragged and soggy. But on a public road, that's probably approaching the limit of what's acceptable anyway.
I have an MX5 for this reason. People laugh at me for trading down from a 987 Boxster S (via a V8 Mustang)but that was just too fast for road usage - I never got anywhere near the limits so the drive was somewhat clinical.

I have a MK3 MX5 as a commuter and I press on every time I drive it - the sensation of speed means I'm rarely braking the law to an extent that anyone would be bothered about.

Great little cars - only downside is space, the size of the steering wheel and that the gearing is a bit short to make it a comfortable motorway cruiser.

VR46

289 posts

170 months

Saturday 26th May 2012
quotequote all
For 8k I'd be lookIng at a s2000.

TwigtheWonderkid

48,661 posts

177 months

Saturday 26th May 2012
quotequote all
MX-5.

I doesn't matter hoe fast you're going, it's how fast it feels that's the key. That's why the MX-5 is so awesome.

I've driven many, from the early 1.6 to the latest ones, and they are all a complete hoot.

Dusty964

7,271 posts

217 months

Saturday 26th May 2012
quotequote all
The seven- all day long.

i am in the minority though- i really cant see what all the fuss is about with the MX5, i have driven several, and was never really that impressed.

anonymous-user

81 months

Saturday 26th May 2012
quotequote all
VR46 said:
For 8k I'd be lookIng at a s2000.
I'd have an mx-5 over an S2K and a se7en over either of them. Caterhams are no less practical really and surprisingly comfortable over distance.

Baron Greenback

7,740 posts

177 months

Saturday 26th May 2012
quotequote all
I would go for the a lotus 7 replica i think you pay too much for a caterham. I have a L7R as only car without a garage as only car! loved it!

CYMR0

3,940 posts

227 months

Saturday 26th May 2012
quotequote all
Spend a bag on the '5 and if you feel there's room for more in your life once you've had it a few months, sell it for what you paid for it and get something with more speed, more raw handling, or whatever else the Caterham might give you.

Jasandjules

72,337 posts

256 months

Saturday 26th May 2012
quotequote all
Why is this a choice? Get the Caterham (or better yet a Chimaera or an Elise)..

Chris71

21,549 posts

269 months

Saturday 26th May 2012
quotequote all
I've owned both in the past. Needless to say the Caterham is light years ahead in every aspect when you get it on a track or an empty B-road. If that's the prime reason for buying the car and you'll get to do that a lot then go for a Caterham - or something similar - without even thinking about it. My Caterham cost me less to run than the MX5 did and it was a hoot on track.

If, however, you plan to use it every day and/or do long distance touring in it then the Caterham is less suitable. I know there are people who use them for commuting in all weathers, and maybe if you have a secure place to park at work and your morning slog takes you over the Pennines then it's worth doing, but for suburbia it's just not worth the dubious weather protection, almost total lack of security and the level of attention it will generate.

As you may have detected, I couldn't find enough occasions to use a car as focused as the Seven, so it didn't make a whole load of sense in the end - even with a garage for it to sit in, unused. I am so glad I experienced it, but I don't have a huge desire to go back.

While the MX5 wasn't even on the same plane as the Caterham it's the one I'd be more tempted to revisit, simply because you can use it far more often - you're not waiting for a sunny Sunday afternoon.

Ferg

15,242 posts

284 months

Saturday 26th May 2012
quotequote all
Dusty964 said:
I really cant see what all the fuss is about with the MX5, i have driven several, and was never really that impressed.
Me neither... confused I'd like the fun factor of a Seven, but not the dampness. So I have the Libra.