Cars that manufactures made worse
Cars that manufactures made worse
Author
Discussion

RB Will

Original Poster:

10,691 posts

264 months

Tuesday 29th May 2012
quotequote all
I took the OHs Suzuki Swift (2008 model) in for a service yesterday and was given a 2012 model as a loan car.

They have ruined it!
It looks worse.
Interior materials are nastier to look at and touch.
the ergonomics of the cabin are now less comfortable and it is harder to get to various buttons.
It is awful to drive. The gear lever feels like it is set in custard compared to the nice direct feel of the OHs older model. The pedals and steering have no feel or weight to them in the new model. It feels like you are driving a car with a computer in control that takes a while to do what you ask of it where the old car is really direct.
The seats were more restrictive and uncomfortable. Its harder to place on the road as the driving position is a bit different and it feels a lot bigger.

On the plus side it was slightly more economical than the OHs old model. Which I suppose is about the only criteria that matters to most people

Safe to say we won't be upgrading to a new version at any point.

Are there any other cars that you feel have taken a major step back?

kambites

70,854 posts

245 months

Tuesday 29th May 2012
quotequote all
Most of them, from a driving enthusiasts point of view, IMO. Not many have got worse in quite that many ways though, I doubt.

jon-

16,534 posts

240 months

Tuesday 29th May 2012
quotequote all
Ford KA.

It went from a fun little bubble powered by dreams and unicorn wishes to a generic eurobox with no character at all.

As the post above says, most "normal" cars have taken many steps back from a driving point of view thanks to the masses wanting soft and comfortable and the regulations changing constantly to promote weight.

MarkRSi

5,782 posts

242 months

Tuesday 29th May 2012
quotequote all
I suspect the new model would be much cheaper for Suzuki to build...?

RB Will

Original Poster:

10,691 posts

264 months

Tuesday 29th May 2012
quotequote all
Possibly, although the gadgets in it seem more expensive. The stereo and trip computer look a bit more fancy but do pretty much the same things and the car is bigger overall and I think it sells for more.
You are probably right though and that would be an incentive for Suzuki.

The Big G

1,003 posts

192 months

Tuesday 29th May 2012
quotequote all
This



To this


Riknos

4,701 posts

228 months

Tuesday 29th May 2012
quotequote all
Pretty much all modern cars for me, I much prefer the driver feel of older versions - All down to weight, emissions etc crap and the public caring more about cup holders than torque curves..

muffinmenace

1,095 posts

212 months

Tuesday 29th May 2012
quotequote all


To this


muffinmenace

1,095 posts

212 months

Tuesday 29th May 2012
quotequote all
On a serious note, you could also add to it to manufacturers who've made steps to go back to the better previous version e.g.

E39->E60->F10 ?

Eighteeteewhy

7,259 posts

192 months

Tuesday 29th May 2012
quotequote all

From this...


To this... vomit

peterbredde

775 posts

224 months

Tuesday 29th May 2012
quotequote all
Looks like ford are on a roll. The MK1 focus was a gem with pretty individual styling for its time. Every car since has been a pile. I kept my MK 2 for about 6 months and sold it before I died of boredom. And I pulled into a petrol station next to the new model this morning - it's a bum. Just a smelly old bum.

crofty1984

16,940 posts

228 months

Tuesday 29th May 2012
quotequote all
muffinmenace said:
On a serious note, you could also add to it to manufacturers who've made steps to go back to the better previous version e.g.

E39->E60->F10 ?
911 from 996 to 997

Codswallop

5,257 posts

218 months

Tuesday 29th May 2012
quotequote all
This lithe, interesting original design;



To big, fat amorphous blob;



To ugly for the sake of ugly on the new car;


Deranged Granny

2,322 posts

192 months

Tuesday 29th May 2012
quotequote all
Codswallop said:
To ugly for the sake of ugly on the new car;

Isn't that terrible - even the badge is worse.

RB Will

Original Poster:

10,691 posts

264 months

Tuesday 29th May 2012
quotequote all
Deranged Granny said:
Isn't that terrible - even the badge is worse.
It think the badge is even back to front laugh

(yes I know the photo will have been mirrored)

MDT

688 posts

196 months

Tuesday 29th May 2012
quotequote all
Golf's

Mk2 to Mk3 ?


DoctorX

8,041 posts

191 months

Tuesday 29th May 2012
quotequote all
RB Will said:
It think the badge is even back to front laugh

(yes I know the photo will have been mirrored)
Hate the way they shape the bonnet around the badge. Looks crap. The rear lights are the worst fitted to any car.

RB Will

Original Poster:

10,691 posts

264 months

Tuesday 29th May 2012
quotequote all
DoctorX said:
Hate the way they shape the bonnet around the badge. Looks crap. The rear lights are the worst fitted to any car.
Now you have pointed that out it makes it look like the bonnet is not even shut.

rejn

2,018 posts

246 months

Tuesday 29th May 2012
quotequote all
MDT said:
Golf's

Mk2 to Mk3 ?
And Golf GTIs from Mark 1 to Mark 2 to Mark 3 to Mark 4 - before finally finding a return to form with the Mark 5/6

Justin Cyder

12,624 posts

173 months

Tuesday 29th May 2012
quotequote all
205 gti hoorah.

206 gti. wtf?